The recidivism rate for convicted sex offenders is 8%. A warden suspects that this percent is different if the sex offender is also a drug addict. Of the 321 convicted sex offenders who were also drug addicts, 22 of them became repeat offenders. What can be concluded at the a = 0.01 level of significance?

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
icon
Related questions
Question
The recidivism rate for convicted sex offenders is 8%. A
warden suspects that this percent is different if the sex
offender is also a drug addict. Of the 321 convicted sex
offenders who were also drug addicts, 22 of them became
repeat offenders. What can be concluded at the a = 0.01
level of significance?
Transcribed Image Text:The recidivism rate for convicted sex offenders is 8%. A warden suspects that this percent is different if the sex offender is also a drug addict. Of the 321 convicted sex offenders who were also drug addicts, 22 of them became repeat offenders. What can be concluded at the a = 0.01 level of significance?
g. Thus, the final conclusion is that ...
The data suggest the populaton proportion is
significantly different from 8% at a = 0.01, so
there is statistically significant evidence to
conclude that the population proportion of
%3D
convicted sex offender drug addicts who become
repeat offenders is different from 8%.
The data suggest the population proportion is
not significantly different from 8% at a = 0.01,
so there is statistically significant evidence to
conclude that the population proportion of
convicted sex offender drug addicts who become
repeat offenders is equal to 8%.
%3D
The data suggest the population proportion is
0.01,
not significantly different from 8% at a =
so there is statistically insignificant evidence to
conclude that the population proportion of
convicted sex offender drug addicts who become
repeat offenders is different from 8%.
h. Interpret the p-value in the context of the study.
If the sample proportion of convicted sex
offender drug addicts who become repeat
offenders is 7% and if another 321 convicted sex
offender drug addicts are observed, then there
would be a 44.9% chance that we would
conclude either fewer than 8% of all convicted
sex offender drug addicts become repeat
offenders or more than 8% of all convicted sex
offender drug addicts become repeat offenders.
There is a 44.9% chance that the percent of all
convicted sex offender drug addicts become
repeat offenders differs from 8%.
There is a 44.9% chance of a Type I error.
If the population proportion of convicted sex
offender drug addicts who become repeat
offenders is 8% and if another 321 convicted sex
offender drug addicts are observed then there
would be a 44.9% chance that either fewer than
7% of the 321 convicted sex offender drug
addicts in the study become repeat offenders or
more than 9% of the 321 convicted sex offender
drug addicts in the study become repeat
offenders.
i. Interpret the level of significance in the context of the
study.
There is a 1% chance that the proportion of all
convicted sex offender drug addicts who become
repeat offenders is different from 8%.
O If the population proportion of convicted sex
offender drug addicts who become repeat
offenders is different from 8% and if another 321
convicted sex offender drug addicts are
observed then there would be a 1% chance that
we would end up falsely concluding that the
proportion of all convicted sex offender drug
addicts who become repeat offenders is equal to
8%.
O If the population proportion of convicted sex
offender drug addicts who become repeat
offenders is 8% and if another 321 convicted sex
offender drug addicts are observed, then there
would be a 1% chance that we would end up
falsely concluding that the proportion of all
convicted sex offender drug addicts who become
repeat offenders is different from 8%.
There is a 1% chance that Lizard People aka
"Reptilians" are running the world.
Transcribed Image Text:g. Thus, the final conclusion is that ... The data suggest the populaton proportion is significantly different from 8% at a = 0.01, so there is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population proportion of %3D convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is different from 8%. The data suggest the population proportion is not significantly different from 8% at a = 0.01, so there is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is equal to 8%. %3D The data suggest the population proportion is 0.01, not significantly different from 8% at a = so there is statistically insignificant evidence to conclude that the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is different from 8%. h. Interpret the p-value in the context of the study. If the sample proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is 7% and if another 321 convicted sex offender drug addicts are observed, then there would be a 44.9% chance that we would conclude either fewer than 8% of all convicted sex offender drug addicts become repeat offenders or more than 8% of all convicted sex offender drug addicts become repeat offenders. There is a 44.9% chance that the percent of all convicted sex offender drug addicts become repeat offenders differs from 8%. There is a 44.9% chance of a Type I error. If the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is 8% and if another 321 convicted sex offender drug addicts are observed then there would be a 44.9% chance that either fewer than 7% of the 321 convicted sex offender drug addicts in the study become repeat offenders or more than 9% of the 321 convicted sex offender drug addicts in the study become repeat offenders. i. Interpret the level of significance in the context of the study. There is a 1% chance that the proportion of all convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is different from 8%. O If the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is different from 8% and if another 321 convicted sex offender drug addicts are observed then there would be a 1% chance that we would end up falsely concluding that the proportion of all convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is equal to 8%. O If the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is 8% and if another 321 convicted sex offender drug addicts are observed, then there would be a 1% chance that we would end up falsely concluding that the proportion of all convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is different from 8%. There is a 1% chance that Lizard People aka "Reptilians" are running the world.
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman