Structural Analysis
Structural Analysis
6th Edition
ISBN: 9781337630931
Author: KASSIMALI, Aslam.
Publisher: Cengage,
Bartleby Related Questions Icon

Related questions

bartleby

Concept explainers

Question
Question # 13, Case 3: Bid-design-build
This general contractor has been awarded a two-story speculative office building
project on a lump sum bid basis. The mechanical, electrical, and plumbing (MEP)
systems, including the heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) and fire
protection systems, were also bid on a lump sum but design-build basis, with very
little criteria information available for them to base their bids on. The
subcontractors were responsible for preparing their own documents and having
them stamped by a state-licensed engineer and obtain their own permits. The
general contractor did not submit these documents to the owner for approval, as it
was not specified that they had to do so. The MEP systems subcontractors have
routinely received city inspections and approvals for work in place. As the project
nears completion, the owner and his architect have just walked the project, and
they have discovered that several areas of the design-build MEP subcontractors
work are not up to their expectations. This includes:
HVAC: The ceiling is being used as a return air plenum. This is much less
expensive than utilizing a ducted return air system. It is also noisier, less
efficient, dirtier, and requires plenum-rated electrical cabling
Plumbing: The bathroom plumbing fixtures appear to be more residential
than commercial-grade. They are less expensive, but they do meet code.
- Electrical: The light fixtures that are being installed are 2×4' prismatic
versus more energy-efficient, more expensive, and more attractive deep cell
parabolic.
- Fire protection: The fire protection sprinkler heads have not been installed
center of ceiling tile, and are not lined up in the large open office areas and
hallways.
- MEP controls: The HVAC systems have been ganged under very large
control zones such that there are only two thermostats per floor. Even the
conference rooms, break rooms, and corner offices are not on separate
The owner's representative is now withholding a current pay request for $300,000
requesting the general contractor correct what he feels are deficiencies. Can he do
this? Should the general contractor keep proceeding? Should the GC force the
subcontractors to fix the problems? Do subcontractors care about client
satisfaction? How will this be resolved? What could the GC have done to keep this
expand button
Transcribed Image Text:Question # 13, Case 3: Bid-design-build This general contractor has been awarded a two-story speculative office building project on a lump sum bid basis. The mechanical, electrical, and plumbing (MEP) systems, including the heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) and fire protection systems, were also bid on a lump sum but design-build basis, with very little criteria information available for them to base their bids on. The subcontractors were responsible for preparing their own documents and having them stamped by a state-licensed engineer and obtain their own permits. The general contractor did not submit these documents to the owner for approval, as it was not specified that they had to do so. The MEP systems subcontractors have routinely received city inspections and approvals for work in place. As the project nears completion, the owner and his architect have just walked the project, and they have discovered that several areas of the design-build MEP subcontractors work are not up to their expectations. This includes: HVAC: The ceiling is being used as a return air plenum. This is much less expensive than utilizing a ducted return air system. It is also noisier, less efficient, dirtier, and requires plenum-rated electrical cabling Plumbing: The bathroom plumbing fixtures appear to be more residential than commercial-grade. They are less expensive, but they do meet code. - Electrical: The light fixtures that are being installed are 2×4' prismatic versus more energy-efficient, more expensive, and more attractive deep cell parabolic. - Fire protection: The fire protection sprinkler heads have not been installed center of ceiling tile, and are not lined up in the large open office areas and hallways. - MEP controls: The HVAC systems have been ganged under very large control zones such that there are only two thermostats per floor. Even the conference rooms, break rooms, and corner offices are not on separate The owner's representative is now withholding a current pay request for $300,000 requesting the general contractor correct what he feels are deficiencies. Can he do this? Should the general contractor keep proceeding? Should the GC force the subcontractors to fix the problems? Do subcontractors care about client satisfaction? How will this be resolved? What could the GC have done to keep this
Expert Solution
Check Mark
Knowledge Booster
Background pattern image
Civil Engineering
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, civil-engineering and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
Text book image
Structural Analysis
Civil Engineering
ISBN:9781337630931
Author:KASSIMALI, Aslam.
Publisher:Cengage,
Text book image
Structural Analysis (10th Edition)
Civil Engineering
ISBN:9780134610672
Author:Russell C. Hibbeler
Publisher:PEARSON
Text book image
Principles of Foundation Engineering (MindTap Cou...
Civil Engineering
ISBN:9781337705028
Author:Braja M. Das, Nagaratnam Sivakugan
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
Fundamentals of Structural Analysis
Civil Engineering
ISBN:9780073398006
Author:Kenneth M. Leet Emeritus, Chia-Ming Uang, Joel Lanning
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Text book image
Sustainable Energy
Civil Engineering
ISBN:9781337551663
Author:DUNLAP, Richard A.
Publisher:Cengage,
Text book image
Traffic and Highway Engineering
Civil Engineering
ISBN:9781305156241
Author:Garber, Nicholas J.
Publisher:Cengage Learning