The investor-developer would not be comfortable with a 7.8 percent return on cost because the margin for error is too risky. If construction costs are higher or rents are lower than anticipated, the project may not be feasible. The asking price of the project is $2,800,000 and the construction cost per unit is $80,000. The current rent to justify the land acqusition is $1.10 per square foot. The weighted average is 900 square feet per unit. Average vacancy and Operating expenses are 5% and 35% of Gross Revenue respectively. Use the following data to rework the calculations in Concept Box 16.2 in order to assess the feasibility of the project: Required: a. Based on the fact that the project appears to have 9,360 square feet of surface area in excess of zoning requirements, the developer could make an argument to the planning department for an additional 10 units, 250 units in total, or 25 units per acre. What is the percentage return on total cost under the revised proposal? Is the revised proposal financially feasible? b. Suppose the developer could build a 240-unit luxury apartment complex with a cost of $83,000 per unit. Given that NOI is 60% of rents. What would such a project have to rent for (per square foot) to make an 8 percent return on total cost? Complete this question by entering your answers in the tabs below. Required A Required B Based on the fact that the project appears to have 9,360 square feet of surface area in excess of zoning requirements, the developer could make an argument to the planning department for an additional 10 units, 250 units in total, or 25 units per acre. What is the percentage return on total cost under the revised proposal? Is the revised proposal financially feasible? Note: Round your percentage answer "Total cost under the revised proposal" to 2 decimal places. Return on total cost under the revised proposal Whether the revised proposal is financially feasible? % < Prev 14 of 15 Next > Show less A

Cornerstones of Cost Management (Cornerstones Series)
4th Edition
ISBN:9781305970663
Author:Don R. Hansen, Maryanne M. Mowen
Publisher:Don R. Hansen, Maryanne M. Mowen
Chapter19: Capital Investment
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 10E: Roberts Company is considering an investment in equipment that is capable of producing more...
icon
Related questions
Question
None
The investor-developer would not be comfortable with a 7.8 percent return on cost because the margin for error is too risky. If
construction costs are higher or rents are lower than anticipated, the project may not be feasible. The asking price of the project is
$2,800,000 and the construction cost per unit is $80,000. The current rent to justify the land acqusition is $1.10 per square foot. The
weighted average is 900 square feet per unit. Average vacancy and Operating expenses are 5% and 35% of Gross Revenue
respectively. Use the following data to rework the calculations in Concept Box 16.2 in order to assess the feasibility of the project:
Required:
a. Based on the fact that the project appears to have 9,360 square feet of surface area in excess of zoning requirements, the
developer could make an argument to the planning department for an additional 10 units, 250 units in total, or 25 units per acre. What
is the percentage return on total cost under the revised proposal? Is the revised proposal financially feasible?
b. Suppose the developer could build a 240-unit luxury apartment complex with a cost of $83,000 per unit. Given that NOI is 60% of
rents. What would such a project have to rent for (per square foot) to make an 8 percent return on total cost?
Complete this question by entering your answers in the tabs below.
Required A
Required B
Based on the fact that the project appears to have 9,360 square feet of surface area in excess of zoning requirements, the
developer could make an argument to the planning department for an additional 10 units, 250 units in total, or 25 units per
acre. What is the percentage return on total cost under the revised proposal? Is the revised proposal financially feasible?
Note: Round your percentage answer "Total cost under the revised proposal" to 2 decimal places.
Return on total cost under the revised proposal
Whether the revised proposal is financially feasible?
%
< Prev
14 of 15
Next >
Show less A
Transcribed Image Text:The investor-developer would not be comfortable with a 7.8 percent return on cost because the margin for error is too risky. If construction costs are higher or rents are lower than anticipated, the project may not be feasible. The asking price of the project is $2,800,000 and the construction cost per unit is $80,000. The current rent to justify the land acqusition is $1.10 per square foot. The weighted average is 900 square feet per unit. Average vacancy and Operating expenses are 5% and 35% of Gross Revenue respectively. Use the following data to rework the calculations in Concept Box 16.2 in order to assess the feasibility of the project: Required: a. Based on the fact that the project appears to have 9,360 square feet of surface area in excess of zoning requirements, the developer could make an argument to the planning department for an additional 10 units, 250 units in total, or 25 units per acre. What is the percentage return on total cost under the revised proposal? Is the revised proposal financially feasible? b. Suppose the developer could build a 240-unit luxury apartment complex with a cost of $83,000 per unit. Given that NOI is 60% of rents. What would such a project have to rent for (per square foot) to make an 8 percent return on total cost? Complete this question by entering your answers in the tabs below. Required A Required B Based on the fact that the project appears to have 9,360 square feet of surface area in excess of zoning requirements, the developer could make an argument to the planning department for an additional 10 units, 250 units in total, or 25 units per acre. What is the percentage return on total cost under the revised proposal? Is the revised proposal financially feasible? Note: Round your percentage answer "Total cost under the revised proposal" to 2 decimal places. Return on total cost under the revised proposal Whether the revised proposal is financially feasible? % < Prev 14 of 15 Next > Show less A
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Cornerstones of Cost Management (Cornerstones Ser…
Cornerstones of Cost Management (Cornerstones Ser…
Accounting
ISBN:
9781305970663
Author:
Don R. Hansen, Maryanne M. Mowen
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Financial And Managerial Accounting
Financial And Managerial Accounting
Accounting
ISBN:
9781337902663
Author:
WARREN, Carl S.
Publisher:
Cengage Learning,
Managerial Accounting
Managerial Accounting
Accounting
ISBN:
9781337912020
Author:
Carl Warren, Ph.d. Cma William B. Tayler
Publisher:
South-Western College Pub