The figure shows the trade-off between consumption and quality of the environment. Which of the following statements best explains the shape of the feasible consumption frontier?

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
14th Edition
ISBN:9780190931919
Author:NEWNAN
Publisher:NEWNAN
Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1QTC
icon
Related questions
Question
The figure shows the trade-off between consumption and quality of the
environment. Which of the following statements best explains the shape of the
feasible consumption frontier?
100
Feasible consumption frontier
(given abatement technology)
Maximum level
of consumption
zero abatement
Feasible set
E with zero
abatement
500
Quality of the environment, E
Transcribed Image Text:The figure shows the trade-off between consumption and quality of the environment. Which of the following statements best explains the shape of the feasible consumption frontier? 100 Feasible consumption frontier (given abatement technology) Maximum level of consumption zero abatement Feasible set E with zero abatement 500 Quality of the environment, E
Consumption of goods and services (billions €)
The marginal rate of transformation increases as more consumption is given up.
As we sacrifice more and more consumption, the marginal gains in terms of
environmental quality increase.
The diagram shows that the environmental gains from giving up consumption
are large (and cheap) at the beginning. This is because it assumes that we adopt
the most cost-effective technologies first.
We care less about giving up some consumption when consumption is high (say
from 500 to 450) than we do when consumption is low (say 100 to 50).
Transcribed Image Text:Consumption of goods and services (billions €) The marginal rate of transformation increases as more consumption is given up. As we sacrifice more and more consumption, the marginal gains in terms of environmental quality increase. The diagram shows that the environmental gains from giving up consumption are large (and cheap) at the beginning. This is because it assumes that we adopt the most cost-effective technologies first. We care less about giving up some consumption when consumption is high (say from 500 to 450) than we do when consumption is low (say 100 to 50).
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Production Possibility Frontier
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
Economics
ISBN:
9780190931919
Author:
NEWNAN
Publisher:
Oxford University Press
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134078779
Author:
Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:
PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134870069
Author:
William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:
PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:
9781305585126
Author:
N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:
9781337106665
Author:
Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…
Economics
ISBN:
9781259290619
Author:
Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education