The bimatrix represents a simultaneous move game between Rowena and Colin. Rowena's payoff is the left number in each cell. ROWENA Up Down 0.25Left +0.75Right 0.65Left +0.35Right Find Colin's mixed strategy that makes Rowena indifferent between a pure strategy of playing Up and a pure strategy of playing Down. 0.5Left +0.5Right Left 1,16 2,20 0.45Left +0.55Right COLIN Right 4,6 3,40

The bimatrix represents a simultaneous move game between Rowena and Colin. Rowena's payoff is the left number in each cell. ROWENA Up Down 0.25Left +0.75Right 0.65Left +0.35Right Find Colin's mixed strategy that makes Rowena indifferent between a pure strategy of playing Up and a pure strategy of playing Down. 0.5Left +0.5Right Left 1,16 2,20 0.45Left +0.55Right COLIN Right 4,6 3,40

Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies and Tactics (MindTap Course List)

14th Edition

ISBN:9781305506381

Author:James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. Harris

Publisher:James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. Harris

Chapter13: best-practice Tactics: Game Theory

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 2E

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Martin has a brother and can take a selfish action, which pays him $10 and his brother $0, or an altruistic action, which pays him $6 and his brother $6. The parents love their children equally and decide how to distribute $20 between them. The parents' payment is the minimum of their two children's payments. Assume that the game is simultaneous. Find the Nash equilibrium.
Consider the following sequential game. Wally first chooses L or H. Having observed Wally's choice, Elizabeth chooses between A and F. The payoffs are as follows. If Wally chose L and Elizabeth chose A, the payoffs are 30 to Wally and 20 to Elizabeth. If Wally chose L and Elizabeth F, the payoffs are 40 to Wally and 10 and to Elizabeth. If Wally decides to opt for H and Elizabeth A, the payoffs are 10 and 2 to Wally and Elizabeth, respectively. Finally, if Wally opts for H and Elizabeth F, the payoffs are 35 toWally and 5 to Elizabeth. What is the outcome in the subgame perfect equilibrium of this game? (L,F) (H,A) (H,F) and (L,F) (L,A) and (H,F) (H,F)
7. Solving for dominant strategies and the Nash equilibrium Suppose Dmitri and Frances are playing a game in which both must simultaneously choose the action Left or Right. The payoff matrix that follows shows the payoff each person will earn as a function of both of their choices. For example, the lower-right cell shows that if Dmitri chooses Right and Frances chooses Right, Dmitri will receive a payoff of 7 and Frances will receive a payoff of 6. Frances Left Right Left 4, 3 6, 4 Dmitri Right 6, 7 7, 6 to choose The only dominant strategy in this game is for and Frances chooses The outcome reflecting the unique Nash equilibrium in this game is as follows: Dmitri chooses v
Consider the Normal Form Game characterized in the following figure: P1 \ P2 b1 b2 b3 a1 (1,2) (0,1) (0,3) a2 (3,-1) (1,1) (-1,0) a3 (2,2) (1,-1) (3,0) a4 (-5,1) (-1,0) (-3,-2) a5 (-3,3) (3,0) (2,4) What is the set of actions of player 1? O la 1, a2, a3, a4, a5) O (b1,b2, b3} O {a2, a3, a4) O (bl, b2}
Three politicians are voting on whether to allow themselves a salary increase of$3,500per a year. If they vote in favor of a raise, then they lose some public support, costing them each$1,500 per year. The salary increase passes if two or more politicians vote in favor of it. What is this game’s Nash equilibrium (or equilibria)? Explain. There is no need to draw a payoff matrix.
Superstore (S) and Megastore (M) are two competing discount supermarkets. If neither store advertises, S makes $115 in profits and M makes $165. If both stores advertise, S makes $80 and M makes $95. If M advertises and S does not, they make $305 and $55 respectively. If S advertises and M does not, they make $285 and $65 respectively. Based on Game Theory, what will the two firms do? Hint: illustrate the Nash equilibrium to support your answer.
Consider the signaling game below. Does the game have a perfect Bayesian equilibrium in which all sender types play L? Does there exist a perfect Bayesian equilibrium in which all sender types play R? Explain. 1,1 1,00 2,1 0,0 0,0 14 Receiver u Receiver 14 L L L (1/3) 1₂ R (1/3) R (1/3) R 14 Receiver 14 Receiver U 0,1 0,0 1,1 1,0 0,0 2,1
Consider the following simultaneous move game where player 1 has two types. Player 2 does not know if he is playing with type a player 1 or type b player 1. Player 2 C D Player 1 A 12,9 3,6 B 6,0 6,9 C D A 0,9 3,6 B 6,0 6,9 Type a Player 1 Prob = 2/3 Type b Player 1 Prob = 1/3 Find the all the possible Bayesian Nash Equilibriums (BNE) of this game.
Describe the game and find all Nash equilibria in the following situation: Each of two players chooses a non-negative number. In the choice (a1, a2), the payoff of the first player is equal to a1(a2 - a1), and the payoff of the second player is equal to a2(1 – a1 – a2).
Consider the following two-player game.First, player 1 selects a number x≥0. Player 2 observes x. Then, simultaneously andindependently, player 1 selects a number y1 and player 2 selects a number y2, at which pointthe game ends.Player 1’s payoff is: u1(x; y1) = −3y21 + 6y1y2 −13x2 + 8xPlayer 2’s payoff is: u2(y2) = 6y1y2 −6y22 + 12xy2Draw the game tree of this game and identify its Subgame Perfect Nash Equilibrium.
Two individuals are bargaining over the distribution of $100 in which payoffs must be in increments of $5. Each player must submit a one-time bid. If the sum of the bids is less than or equal to $100, each player gets the amount of the bid and the game ends. If the sum of the bids is greater than $100, the game ends and the players get nothing. Does this game have a Nash equilibrium? What is the most likely equilibrium strategy profile for this game?
Amir and Beatrice play the following game. Amir offers an amount of money z € [0, 1] to Beatrice. Beatrice can either accept or reject. If Beatrice accepts, then Amir receives 1 - z dollars and Beatrice receives a dollars. If Beatrice rejects, then both receive no money. As in the Ultimatum Game, Amir cares only about maximizing the amount of money he receives. Beatrice, on the other hand, detests Amir, and therefore cares about the amount of money that both receive: if Amir receives y dollars and Beatrice receives a dollars, then Beatrice's payoff is a-ay where a > 0. (a) Find all pure strategy Nash equilibria of the game in which the two players choose simultaneously (thus Beatrice accepts or rejects without seeing Amir's offer). Solution: The NE are the strategy profiles in which Beatrice rejects and Amir's offer a satisfies 2-a(1-x) ≤0, i.e. r ≤a/(1+a). (b) Find all subgame perfect equilibria of the sequential game in which Amir first makes the offer and Beatrice observes the offer…