help ASK YOUR TEACHERThe authors of a paper randomly selected two samples of patients admitted to the hospital after suffering a stroke. One samplewas selected from patients who received biofeedback weight training for 8 weeks, and the other sample was selected frompatients who did not receive this training. At the end of 8 weeks, the time it took (in seconds) to stand from a sitting position andthen to sit down again (called sit-stand-sit time) was measured for the people in each sample. Data consistent with summaryquantities given in the paper are given below. For purposes of this exercise, you can assume that the samples are representativeof the population of stroke patients who receive the biofeedback training and the population of stroke patients who do not receivethis training.Biofeedback Group2.0 2.7 4.42.2No Biofeedback Group5.3 4.9 4.1PRACTICE ANOTHERMec4.42.8 4.2 3.34.9 4.5 4.4 5.3 3.6 4.4 5.3 4.6 4.2 3.6 4.1Use the given data to construct a 95% confidence interval for the difference in mean sit-stand-sit time for these two populations.(Use biofeedback - no biofeedback: Round your answers to three decimal places.)-0.826X to 1.748X seconds4.1 3.3 3.6 2.9 3.6 3.6 2.4 3.2Interpret the interval.O We are 95% confident that, for patients in the sample, the difference between the mean sit-stand-sit time for patientswho received the biofeedback training and the patients who did not receive biofeedback training is between these twovalues.We are 95% confident that the true difference between the mean sit-stand-sit time for patients who received thebiofeedback training and the patients who did not receive biofeedback training is between these two values.O There is a 95% chance that the true difference between the mean sit-stand-sit time for patients who received thebiofeedback training and the patients who did not receive biofeedback training is between these two values.O There is a 95% chance that the true difference between the mean sit-stand-sit time for patients who receivedbiofeedback training and the patients who did not receive biofeedback training is directly in the middle of these twovalues.O There is a 95% chance that, for patients in the sample, the difference between the mean sit-stand-sit time for patientswho received the biofeedback training and the patients who did not receive biofeedback training is between these twovalues.inusS3.5

The authors of a paper randomly selected two samples of patients admitted to the hospital after suffering a stroke. One sample was selected from patients who received biofeedback weight training for 8 weeks, and the other sample was selected from patients who did not receive this training. At the end of 8 weeks, the time it took (in seconds) to stand from a sitting position and then to sit down again (called sit-stand-sit time) was measured for the people in each sample. Data consistent with summary quantities given in the paper are given below. For purposes of this exercise, you can assume that the samples are representative of the population of stroke patients who receive the biofeedback training and the population of stroke patients who do not receive this training. Biofeedback Group 2.0 2.7 4.4 2.2 2.8 4.2 3.3 4.1 3.3 3.6 2.9 3.6 3.6 2.4 No Biofeedback Group 5.3 4.9 4.1 4.4 4.9 4.5 4.4 5.3 3.6 4.4 5.3 4.6 4.2 3.6 3.2 4.1 Use the given data to construct a 95% confidence interval for the difference in mean sit-stand-sit time for these two populations. (Use #biofeedback - no biofeedback Round your answers to three decimal places.) -0.826 X to 1.748 X seconds Interpret the interval. O We are 95% confident that, for patients in the sample, the difference between the mean sit-stand-sit time for patients who received the biofeedback training and the patients who did not receive biofeedback training is between these two values. O We are 95% confident that the true difference between the mean sit-stand-sit time for patients who received the biofeedback training and the patients who did not receive biofeedback training is between these two values. O There is a 95% chance that the true difference between the mean sit-stand-sit time for patients who received the biofeedback training and the patients who did not receive biofeedback training is between these two values. O There is a 95% chance that the true difference between the mean sit-stand-sit time for patients who received biofeedback training and the patients who did not receive biofeedback training is directly in the middle of these two values. O There is a 95% chance that, for patients in the sample, the difference between the mean sit-stand-sit time for patients who received the biofeedback training and the patients who did not receive biofeedback training is between these two values.