Take, for example, the database used by a major airline that manages its data using snapshot isolation. In what circumstances would an airline be ready to forego better overall performance in favor of a nonserializable execution?

Consider, for instance, the database management system that is used by an airline; such a system often has snapshot isolation as one of its many capabilities. I was hoping that you could provide me an example of a non-serializable execution that the airline is ready to endure in order to get better performance as a whole. If you could, that would be much appreciated.

Consider a database used by a major airline, where snapshot isolation is used by the underlying database management system. Although the airline would prefer a serializable execution, it may be willing to accept a non serializable execution if it means better overall speed.

Take, for example, the database used by a major airline that manages its data using snapshot isolation. In what circumstances would an airline tolerate a non-serializable execution in exchange for better overall performance?