Solid Waste Engineering
Solid Waste Engineering
3rd Edition
ISBN: 9781305635203
Author: Worrell, William A.
Publisher: Cengage Learning,
Bartleby Related Questions Icon

Related questions

bartleby

Concept explainers

Question
TABLE 3-4
Typical physical composition of residential MSW excluding recycled
materials and food wastes discharged with wastewater (1990)
Percent by weight
Component
Organic
Food wastes
Paper
Cardboard
Plastics
Textiles
Rubber
Leather
Yard wastes
Wood
Misc. organics
Inorganic
Glass
Tin cans
Aluminum
Other metal
Dirt, ash, etc.
Total
United States"
Range
6-18
25-40
3-10
4-10
0-4
0-2
0-2
5-20
1-4
4-12
2-8
0-1
1-4
0-6
Typical'
9.0
34.0
6.0
7.0
2.0
0.5
0.5
18.5
2.0
8.0
6.0
0.5
3.0
3.0
100.0
Packaging materials
79,5
50-60
12-16-
4-8
20-30
6-8
2-4
Davis, Californiad
6.0
33.1
7.9
10.7
2.4
2.5
0.1
17.7
5.0
0.4
5.8
3.9
0.4
3.6
0.5
100.0
= 20.5
a Adapted in part from Refs. 2, 3, 9, and 14-16. Reported percentage distributions are exclusive of special and
hazardous wastes.
Twenty percent of the households in the United States are assumed to have food waste grinders. Additionally,
it is assumed that the percentage of food waste ground up and discharged with wastewater is 25 percent.
Current (1990) recycling rate for the United States assumed to be 11 percent.
Adapted in part from Ref. 10.
Based on measurements made over a five-year period (1985 to 1990) during the first two weeks of October
(see Table 3-9).
expand button
Transcribed Image Text:TABLE 3-4 Typical physical composition of residential MSW excluding recycled materials and food wastes discharged with wastewater (1990) Percent by weight Component Organic Food wastes Paper Cardboard Plastics Textiles Rubber Leather Yard wastes Wood Misc. organics Inorganic Glass Tin cans Aluminum Other metal Dirt, ash, etc. Total United States" Range 6-18 25-40 3-10 4-10 0-4 0-2 0-2 5-20 1-4 4-12 2-8 0-1 1-4 0-6 Typical' 9.0 34.0 6.0 7.0 2.0 0.5 0.5 18.5 2.0 8.0 6.0 0.5 3.0 3.0 100.0 Packaging materials 79,5 50-60 12-16- 4-8 20-30 6-8 2-4 Davis, Californiad 6.0 33.1 7.9 10.7 2.4 2.5 0.1 17.7 5.0 0.4 5.8 3.9 0.4 3.6 0.5 100.0 = 20.5 a Adapted in part from Refs. 2, 3, 9, and 14-16. Reported percentage distributions are exclusive of special and hazardous wastes. Twenty percent of the households in the United States are assumed to have food waste grinders. Additionally, it is assumed that the percentage of food waste ground up and discharged with wastewater is 25 percent. Current (1990) recycling rate for the United States assumed to be 11 percent. Adapted in part from Ref. 10. Based on measurements made over a five-year period (1985 to 1990) during the first two weeks of October (see Table 3-9).
3-3. A community is now achieving a 25 percent by weight separation of wastes made
up of the following items: mixed paper, 44%; cardboard, 6%; plastics, 10%; yard
waste, 16%; glass, 12%; and mixed metal (tin cans and other metals), 12%. If the
distribution of waste components given in column 3 of Table 3-4 is representative of
the wastes that are now collected, determine the as generated percentage distribution
of the waste components.
expand button
Transcribed Image Text:3-3. A community is now achieving a 25 percent by weight separation of wastes made up of the following items: mixed paper, 44%; cardboard, 6%; plastics, 10%; yard waste, 16%; glass, 12%; and mixed metal (tin cans and other metals), 12%. If the distribution of waste components given in column 3 of Table 3-4 is representative of the wastes that are now collected, determine the as generated percentage distribution of the waste components.
Expert Solution
Check Mark
Knowledge Booster
Background pattern image
Civil Engineering
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, civil-engineering and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Text book image
Solid Waste Engineering
Civil Engineering
ISBN:9781305635203
Author:Worrell, William A.
Publisher:Cengage Learning,