Question
![Susan is an American citizen who enters into an employment contract with the Spanish government to teach
Spanish government employees how to write grants. Susan was paid for her first two months of work but has not
been paid for three months since. Susan files a lawsuit against the Spanish government in a United States District
Court. Spain desires to have its day in court, so Spain waives immunity. The United States District Court will
O
a. dismiss the case because Susan is an American citizen.
b. dismiss the case because the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act states that American courts cannot hear
cases against foreign governments.
hear the case because the Act of State Doctrine requires that international contracts be honored.
d. hear the case because Spain waived immunity.
C.](https://content.bartleby.com/qna-images/question/f46c6c1c-9cf3-4090-96fd-ea5e3513a088/182672f2-cc20-4394-ab6e-95b8959ad211/mx4r5_thumbnail.jpeg)
Transcribed Image Text:Susan is an American citizen who enters into an employment contract with the Spanish government to teach
Spanish government employees how to write grants. Susan was paid for her first two months of work but has not
been paid for three months since. Susan files a lawsuit against the Spanish government in a United States District
Court. Spain desires to have its day in court, so Spain waives immunity. The United States District Court will
O
a. dismiss the case because Susan is an American citizen.
b. dismiss the case because the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act states that American courts cannot hear
cases against foreign governments.
hear the case because the Act of State Doctrine requires that international contracts be honored.
d. hear the case because Spain waived immunity.
C.
Expert Solution
![Check Mark](/static/check-mark.png)
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Step by stepSolved in 4 steps
![Blurred answer](/static/blurred-answer.jpg)
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Moises and Rutledge are discussing their views on the law. Moises believes that people should give up some of their rights to the government, but they should be able to retain other inalienable rights. Rutledge believes that the law is a rule of civil conduct prescribed by the supreme power in a state which commands what is right and prohibits what is wrong. Kilroy overhears their conversation and jumps in with his own belief, saying that the law is a social construct that should provide stability. order, and security. He also said that he believes people should relinquish all of their rights to the state. Which philosophers would agree with Moises, Rutledge, and Kilroy, respectively? O Montesquieu, Hobbes, Locke O Blackstone, Hobbes, Montesquieu O Locke, Blackstone, Hobbes O Montesquieu, Blackstone, Hobbes O Locke, Montesquieu, Blackstonearrow_forwardFollowing the Supreme Court’s reversal of Roe, what rights do women have under theU.S. Constitution to determine whether to terminate their pregnancy? Explain your answerin detailarrow_forwardConnor applied to be an officer in the Canadian Forces, but his application was denied because of his poor credit rating. He filed a human rights complaint on the basis that the requirement to provide a credit check was discriminatory. Do you think his human rights complaint will be successful?arrow_forward
- Assume Illinois passes a law requiring doctors to be certified before providing medical services to citizens of Illinois. You represent a client who is licensed to practice medicine in Indiana. Your client recently administered a drug to a patient in an emergency room of an Illinois hospital located right across the border of Indiana and Illinois. She is fined $50,000 and refuses to pay. What constitutional arguments can you make on your client’s behalf as to why this law is unconstitutional as applied to her.arrow_forwardBob, an engineer, is a new employee at Airbag Industries, which specializes in manufacturing automotive airbags. Before his employment, Bob is required to sign various documents indicating that he would have access to confidential information related to Airbag Industries' business practices, customer lists, and other information that must remain confidential. It further provided that any new developments created by Bob would be the property of Airbag Industries. Further, it provided that if Bob left the company he could not compete against the company in the United States for 10 years. Bob leaves three years later to set up his own airbag company. Explain why protecting their intellectual property is important to Airbag Industries. What intellectual property issues are involved in this scenario?arrow_forwardDelany and Eden enter into an agreement where Delany will purchase 50 pounds of assorted craft beads from Eden. Eden, however, breaches the contract and does not supply Delany with the contracted beads. This deals with which of the following types of laws? criminal law federal law public law equity private lawarrow_forward
- Sungsam, Inc., a Taiwanese company, and nineteen other Asian companies (the Companies) collaborated to manufacture and sell transistors internationally. These transistors were used in a multitude of consumer goods, millions of which were sold in the United States, including Georgia. The state of Georgia sued the Companies in Georgia, alleging violating consumer protection laws. The Companies filed a motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. In response, Plaintiff alleged that the Companies sold the transistors into international streams of commerce with the intent that they would be incorporated into millions of consumer products sold in the United States, including Georgia. Should the Companies motion be granted? © a. No because the Companies did not sell any products directly to Georgia consumers and did not conduct any business in Georgia. b. Yes because a foreign manufacturer’s placement of goods into the stream of commerce of the state of Georgia, with…arrow_forwardIn eminent domain cases, an individual private party may not benefit from the government's taking of private property for a public purpose. True Falsearrow_forwardJohn works as an engineer for a technological company, and Maria works as a sales executive for a competitor business. Maria reminded John that her profession contains sensitive information, and she cautions him not to reveal anything he learns from her work to anyone. While attending a conference, John overheard two executives from Maria's company discussing a new product launch. He chooses to buy a modest amount of Maria's company's shares, intending to profit from the predicted increase in the company's stock price following the product launch. John double-checked his company's regulations to ensure that there was no conflict of interest or limitation on the purchase. However, as a result of unanticipated factors, the product introduction was delayed, and the stock price of Maria's company fell instead. Instead of the predicted profit, John's investment resulted in a loss. Question : In the view of conflict of interest of ethics in financial analysis, state the key points of the…arrow_forward
- in the Escobar case, Universal Health Services, Inc Petitioner v. United States and Massachusetts, es rel. Julio Escobar, April 19, 2016. This unit treated the relators’ allegations in this case as presenting legally false claims. Explain why the relators’ allegations in the case could actually be viewed as presenting factually false claims.arrow_forwardIn partnership with American Express, Porter Cable requests that all employees at the rank of supervisor and above apply for a corporate credit card to be used for pay for travel, training and similar expenses. Ima Krimnel, the manager of the distribution center, was issued a corporate card and used it to take her husband to Hawaii for their 20th wedding anniversary. If Krimnel does not pay the charges, is Porter Cable liable? Why or why not?arrow_forwardJose buys a jet ski for his 16-year-old son, Carlos. Carlos does not like it and Jose seeks to rescind his purchase since the Jet Ski was to be used by a minor. Explain whether or not Jose will be successful?arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios