Suppose that when performing attention, we have the following keys and values: Keys: Values: {[-3 0 1],[1 1 -1],[011],[1 0 0]} {[211] [122], [0 3 1], [-1 0 2]} We want to compute the attention embedding using these keys and values for the following query: [2 1 -1] Which of the following is the correct attention embedding? To simplify calculations, replace softmax with argmax. For example, softmax([-1,1,0]) would instead be argmax([-1, 1, 0]) = [0, 1, 0]. [211] [122] [031] [301]

Suppose that when performing attention, we have the following keys and values: Keys: Values: {[-3 0 1],[1 1 -1],[011],[1 0 0]} {[211] [122], [0 3 1], [-1 0 2]} We want to compute the attention embedding using these keys and values for the following query: [2 1 -1] Which of the following is the correct attention embedding? To simplify calculations, replace softmax with argmax. For example, softmax([-1,1,0]) would instead be argmax([-1, 1, 0]) = [0, 1, 0]. [211] [122] [031] [301]

COMPREHENSIVE MICROSOFT OFFICE 365 EXCE

1st Edition

ISBN:9780357392676

Author:FREUND, Steven

Publisher:FREUND, Steven

Chapter3: Working With Large Worksheets, Charting, And What-if Analysis

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1.1EYK

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Suppose a qüery sumServ sums the quantities in the CustomerBillitem table and a query sumWaste sums the quantities in the FoodWaste table. For the purpose of summing the quantities in sumServ and sumWaste, the following query design needs: sumserv sunWaste Storeio Storeib FoodiD Foodio Sumoruantity SumorQuantity sen wastew 1) No join from servWk to wasteWk 2) A left outer join on FoodiD 31 Left outer joins on StorelD and FoodID 4) All left outer joins
SQL: Create a SQL query that uses an uncorrelated subquery and no joins to display the descriptions for products provided by a vendor in area code 615. Remember, the main difference between a correlated subquery and uncorrelated subquery is that, in a correlated subquery, the inner query is dependent upon the outer query, while, with an uncorrelated query, the inner query does not depend upon the outer query. Instead, it runs just once. You should NOT use union, minus, or intersect in this query. The outer query will use the PRODUCT table and the inner query will use the VENDOR table [hint: you should have 9 records of output]. My code: select p_descript from product where (select v_areacode from vendor where v_areacode = '615' ; I am getting this error, problem is I can't see what is missing any assistance is appreciated. ORA-00936: missing expression
Why it's useful to have index that partially sort a query if it doesn't present all of the results already sorted?
Implement a query containing a subquery to display the total number of rentals for the customer (unknown before query) who belongs to the city London. Exact display as the following use sakila as Database Thank you 100% C 103:1 Result Grid I & Filter Rows: Q Search customer_id first_name last_name Rental_Count 252 МАTTIE HOFFMAN 22 512 СЕCIL VINES 26
The table R(x,y) currently has the following tuples (note there are duplicates): (1,2), (1,2), (2,3), (3,4), (3,4), (4,1), (4,1), (4,1), (4,2). Compute the result of the query: SELECT R1.x, R2.y, COUNT(*) FROM R R1, R R2 WHERE R1.y = R2.x GROUP BY R1.x, R2.y; Which of the following tuples is in the result? O a. (3, 4, 6) O b. (3, 2, 6) O c. (3, 2, 2) O d. (4, 3, 2)
FROM customer WHERE city IN (SELECT city FROM employee WHERE reports_to= 2); 2. SELECT customer.* FROM customer INNER JOIN employee ON customer.city = employee.city WHERE reports_to = 2; Query #1 would be more efficient as it is based on primary and foreign keys. O Query #1 would be more efficient as it is not using indexed columns. Both would be the same as both use the same indices for the join and filter. Query #2 would be more efficient as it is based on primary and foreign keys. 70°F Cloudy QL
Consider the query:with dept total (dept name, value) as(select dept name, sum(salary)from instructorgroup by dept name),dept total avg(value) as(select avg(value)from dept total)select dept namefrom dept total, dept total avgwhere dept total.value >= dept total avg.value;Rewrite this query without using the with construct.
grade varchar(30), salesman_id int, CONSTRAINT FK_salesman_id FOREIGN KEY (salesman_id) REFERENCES salesman(salesman_id) ); insert into customer (customer_id, cust_name, city, grade, salesman_id) values (3002, 'Nick Rimando', 'New York', 100, 5001); insert into customer (customer_id, cust_name, city, grade, salesman_id) values (3007, 'Brad Davis', 'New York', 200, 5001); insert into customer (customer_id, cust_name, city, grade, salesman_id) values (3005, 'Graham Zusi', "California', 200, 5002); insert into customer (customer_id, cust_name, city, grade, salesman_id) values (3008, Julian Green', "London', 300, 5002); insert into customer (customer_id, cust_name, city, grade, salesman_id) values (3004, 'Fabian Johnson', 'Paris', 300, 5006); insert into customer (customer_id, cust_name, city, grade, salesman_id) values (3009, 'Geoff Cameron', "Berlin', 100, 5003); insert into customer (customer_id, cust_name, city, grade, salesman_id) values (3003, 'Jozy Altidor, 'Moscow', 200, 5007);…
Given the tables create table T (A int primary key, B int); create table U (C int primary key, A int, foreign key(A) references T(A) ); Table T contains 100 rows and table U contains 200 rows. A common mistake made by students is to do a join and assuming the database will supply the join predicate. A student does the query SELECT T.A, T.B, U.C FROM T, U; The student does not get an error message but gets a large result set. How many rows are in the result set?
What does an EXCEPT (MINUS) query care about operand order, while a UNION query doesn't?
12. R S AB [ 3 4 6 BCD 2 4 6 4 G 8 4 7 9 Compute the result of the following query: SELECT R.A, R.B, S.B, S.C, S.D FROM R OUTER JOIN S ON (R.A>S.B AND R.B=S.C) Which of the following tuples of R or S is dangling (and therefore need to be padded in the outer join)? a) (4,6,8) of S. b) (2,4,6) of S. c) (4,7,9) of S. d) (5,6) of R.
Suppose an application programmer was supposed to write a query select * from r natural left outer join s; on relations r(A, B) and s(B, C), but instead wrote the query select * from r natural join s; a. Give sample data for r and s on which both queries would give the same result. b. Give sample data for r and s where the two queries would give different results, thereby exposing the error in the query.