Suppose that the owner of Boyer Construction is feeling the pinch of increased premiums associated with workers’ compensation and has decided to cut the wages of its two employees (Albert and Sid) from $23 per hour to $20 per hour. Assume that Albert and Sid view income and leisure as “goods,” that both experience a diminishing rate of marginal substitution between income and leisure, and that the workers have the same before- and after-tax budget constraints at each wage. Albert and Sid's opportunity set is presented below:
What is the value of A when the wage is $23?
(Assume a 24-hour work day.)
What is the value of A when the wage is $20?
(Assume a 24-hour work day.)
At the wage of $23 per hour, both Albert and Sid are observed to consume 13 hours of leisure (and equivalently supply 11 hours of labor). After wages were cut to $20, Albert consumes 10 hours of leisure and Sid consumes 16 hours of leisure. Determine the number of hours of labor each worker supplies at a wage of $20 per hour:
Albert's supply of labor =
Sid's supply of labor =
How can you explain the seemingly contradictory result that the workers supply a different number of labor hours?
multiple choice
-
Albert's income effect dominates his substitution effect when the wage declines to $20, and vice versa for Sid.
-
Albert has no income effect, and Sid has no substitution effect when the wage declines to $20.
-
Albert has no substitution effect, and Sid has no income effect when the wage declines to $20.
-
Albert's substitution effect dominates his income effect when the wage declines to $20, and vice versa for Sid.
Step by stepSolved in 3 steps with 5 images
- Consider the diagram below showing a consumer's choice of goods (Trainers and Electricity), following a rise in the price of Trainers. Identify which statement about the diagram is true. Electricity BL3 BLZ C B IC3 X3 X₂ A X₁ IC₂ -IC₁ BL₁ Trainers O The original consumption bundle is given by point C; the new consumption bundle is given by point A; BL3 represents the compensated budget line, using the Slutsky substitution effect; Trainers are a Giffen good. The original consumption bundle is given by point C; the new consumption bundle is given by point A; BL3 represents the compensated budget line, using the Slutsky substitution effect; Trainers are a normal good. The original consumption bundle is given by point A; the new consumption bundle is given by point C; BL3 represents the compensated budget line, using the Hicksian substitution effect; Trainers are a Giffen good. The original consumption bundle is given by point A; the new consumption bundle is given by point C; BL3…arrow_forwardExplain why the lifetime budget constraint must be satisfied as a strict equalityarrow_forwardTwo individuals, Blair and Anton, derive utility from leisure and from the other goods (OG) they consume. Observing their leisure and OG choices when wage increases, we conclude that Blair has backward-bending labour supply and Anton has upward slopping labour supply. Therefore, Select all that applies a) Leisure is a normal good for Anton but an inferior good for Blair. b) Anton has only an income effect, while Blair has only a substitution effect. O C) Anton's income effect is larger than Blair's income effect, but Anton's substitution effect is smaller than Blair's substitution effect. O d) Anton's substitution effect is larger than his income effect, but Blair's income effect is larger than her substitution effect. O e) Anton's income and substitution effects are negative while Blair's income and substitution effects are positive.arrow_forward
- 11. A worker derives utility from consumption, C and leisure, L U = U(C, L) and initially faces the constraints p.C = N+w.H H = 24 - L where p is the nominal price of consumption, N> 0 is unearned income, w is the nominal wage and H is hours worked. (a) Derive the budget constraint in terms of C and L and show on a diagram an initial optimal choice of C and L, in which both are positive. (b) State this equilibrium algebraically, and briefly explain how it can be derived. (c) Show that, assuming normality of leisure, for some value N*, if N> N*, the individual will choose not to work. Is the initial level of N in your answers to parts a) and b) greater or less than N*?arrow_forwardjust answer the part e notice that you can do part e without the answer of abcd.arrow_forwardUsing the utility function and wage constraint in the problem, please complete the utility maximization problem using the substituion and Lagrangian method. If you can not do both, I would prefer the substitution method.arrow_forward
- Jones, without a job or job prospects, has been on social assistance for the past four months. Social assistance pays a basic benefit of $600 a month with a benefit reduction rate of 75 percent for earned income. Her welfare benefit is given as B = 600 - 0.75E, where E represents monthly earnings. Jones has just been offered a part-time job working 5 hours a day, 5 days a week, earning an hourly wage of $11. Sketch a budget constraint for Jones given the social assistance scheme in place and the wage rate available for part time work. How much income would she earn if she accepted the job? Would Jones still be on social assistance if she took the job? Draw the budget constraint.arrow_forwardFollow up question g. Explain why the utility curves cannot be drawn so as to induce the worker to work between L1 and L2 hours. h Yelowitz (1995) studies a Medicaid reform measure that reduced the Medicaid work disincentive. One of the reforms he studied raised the Medicaid eligibility threshold income level by 33%. Draw a new version of the fifigure with a new labor–income curve that reflflects this change. Explain how this change might induce someone currently working L1 hours per year to work more, and be sure to draw indifffference curves to support your answer.arrow_forwardMrs. Griffiths earns $5000 a week and spends her entire income on dresses and handbags, since these are the only two items that provide her utility. Furthermore, Mrs. Griffiths insists that for every dress she buys, she must also buy a handbag. Draw an indifference curve showing the optimum choice. Label the optimum as point A. What would be the marginal rate of substitution at the point that corresponds to the optimal consumption choice? Interpret the marginal rate of substitutionarrow_forward
- In any given week, Anne receives satisfaction only from the consumption of goods and from the consumption of leisure L, which is measured in hours. Obviously, Anne consumes many different types of goods, but for simplicity we aggregate the dollar value of all the goods that she consumes during the week and call it C. Assume that if Anne chooses to work, the hourly wage rate is w=9 and she has to sleep 8 hours per day. (Sleeping time is not considered leisure.) Potentially, if she wants, she can work up to 7 days a week.arrow_forward3.arrow_forwardConsider Laura who makes $1,400 per week and just won a ‘set for life’ lottery ticket which involves a fortnightly payment of $10,000 for 20 years. Currently she works 35 hours per week. Do the following: 1. Illustrate the effect of the lottery win on lauras budget constraint using a fully labelled diagram where i) the horizontal axis represents the hours of free time per week, and ii) the vertical axis represents lauras weekly consumption. 2. Illustrate on the same diagram lauras optimal decisions before and after the lottery win along with his indifference curves. 3. Based on your diagram, discuss whether Laura will quit her job.arrow_forward
- Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSONEngineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
- Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education