summarize this :
The wandering stars posed a somewhat more difficult problem. Aplanet such as Mars moves slowly from west to east against the fixed background stars and then mysteriously reverses direction for a period of time before resuming its previous path (Fig. 1.2). Attempting to understand this backward, or retrograde, motion became the principal problem in astron-
omy for nearly 2000 years! Eudoxus of Cnidus, a student of Plato's and an exceptional mathematician, suggested that each of the wandering stars occupied its own sphere and that all the spheres were connected through axes oriented at different angles and rotating at var-
ious speeds. Although this theory of a complex system of spheres initially was marginally successful at explaining retrograde motion, predictions began to deviate significantly from the observations as more data were obtained.
Step by stepSolved in 2 steps
- Imagine Saturn was knocked out by its orbit by a massive asteroid. It is now located a slightly further away from the sun at 10.17AU. Using Keplers third law, calculate its new period of revolution, in earth years.arrow_forwardSolve it correctly please. I will rate accordingly. Don't do wrong please, it's very important for me.arrow_forwardSolve it correctly please. I will rate accordingly with multiple votes. This is my last attempt. Please do it correctly.arrow_forward
- A rocket in outer space accelerates "to the left" at 18 m/s2for 30 seconds. Following the acceleration, the rocket is traveling at 490 m/s "leftward". What was its initial velocity? (I put "leftward" in quotes because there is no well-defined left and right, or up and down, in space.) (must show big six)arrow_forwardWhat does first kepler's law states?arrow_forwardKepler's 1st law says that our Solar System's planets orbit in ellipses around the Sun where the closest distance to the Sun is called perihelion. Suppose I tell you that there is a planet with a perihelion distance of 2 AU and a semi-major axis of 1.5 AU. Does this make physical sense? Explain why or why not.arrow_forward
- Suppose, hypothetically, that the Earth orbited the Sun at half its current distance. (That is, at 1/2 AU instead of 1 AU). What would be the length of the year? What else would be different?arrow_forwardHow would i do part A? and what is it asking?arrow_forwardKepler's 3rd law is given as p2 = a3. If the orbital period of a space telescope at the second Sun-Earth Lagrange point (L2) is 1 year, is its orbit a violation of Kepler's 3rd law?arrow_forward