Statement Justification Negation =(paq)v(-pat) laws =(paq)v~p i. =(pv-p)^(qv-p) i. =ta(qv-p) ii.

Translate the following argument into a first-order language: Every instance of knowledge is an instance of non-accidentally true belief.   Every Gettier case is an instance of accidentally true belief.   Some cases of justified true belief are Gettier cases.   ---------------------------------------------------------------------   Some cases of justified true belief are not instances of knowledge.

Translate the following argument into symbolic form. Then determine whether the argument is valid or invalid. If the band plays rock music, then they have a guitarist. They do not have a guitarist. Therefore, the band does not play rock music. Write the statement in symbolic form.

How do I translate this sentence into a symbolic argument? And is this sentence valid or not valid?  If a shape is a rectangle, and adjacent sides are congruent, then it is a square.

Determine which if any of the following statements are equivalent The pay is good and today is Monday If I take the job, then the pay is good or today is Monday The pay is good and Today is Monday, or I will take the job

Which conclusion follows from the 2 given statements ?

Indicate whether the argument is valid or invalid. Choose True for valid Choose False for invalid p v q True False

Instructions: For each argument below, evaluate the truth of each premise (write “true,”“false,” or “questionable”). Then evaluate the argument’s support (write “valid” or“invalid,” and briefly explain why). Finally, determine the overall quality of theargument (write “sound” or “unsound”), and briefly explain whySAMPLE: P1) Some dads have a beard.P2) All bearded people are mean.C) Some dads are mean.Truth of premise 1: trueTruth of premise 2: questionable (“mean” is subjective)(true, false, or questionable)Support: valid(valid or invalid)Why: the premises establish that bearded dads are mean,so some dads (the ones with beards) are meanOverall: unsound(sound or unsound)Why: fails the truth test -- premise 2 is not true1. P1) All cats are fish.P2) All fish live underwater. .C) All cats live underwater.Truth of premise 1:Truth of premise 2:(true, false, or questionable)Support:(valid or invalid)Why:Overall:(sound or unsound)Why:   1. P1) All cats are fish.P2) All fish live…

Determine whether the argument is valid or invalid.          r ↔ p         q ∨ r     ∴  p ∨ r

Identify the argument as converse fallacy or inverse fallacy All Employees Regularly Late will be Fired. Sharon was fired. ⇒ Sharon was regularly late.