MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN: 9781119256830
Author: Amos Gilat
Publisher: John Wiley & Sons Inc
Bartleby Related Questions Icon

Related questions

Question
### Analysis of Proportions of Defective Components from Three Suppliers

**Background:**
Benson Manufacturing is considering ordering electronic components from three different suppliers. The suppliers may differ in terms of quality, specifically in the proportion of defective components. To evaluate the proportion of defective components from the suppliers, Benson requested a sample shipment of 500 components from each supplier. The data on the number of defective components and the number of good components from each supplier is as follows:

| Component  | Supplier A | Supplier B | Supplier C |
|------------|------------|------------|------------|
| Good       | 483        | 478        | 458        |
| Defective  | 17         | 22         | 42         |

**Objectives:**
1. Formulate the hypotheses to test if the proportion of defective components is equal among the three suppliers.
2. Conduct a hypothesis test using a 0.05 level of significance.
3. Use multiple comparison tests to determine if one supplier can be eliminated based on poor quality.

#### (a) Formulate the Hypotheses:

- **Null Hypothesis \( H_0 \):** All population proportions of defective components are equal.
  \( p_A = p_B = p_C \)
  
- **Alternative Hypothesis \( H_3 \):** Not all population proportions of defective components are equal.

#### (b) Conduct the Hypothesis Test:

Using a 0.05 level of significance:
1. **Test Statistic Calculation:**
   \[
   \chi^2 = 13.703
   \]
   
2. **p-value:**
   \[
   p\text{-value} = 0.0011
   \]

Conclusion:
- Since the p-value (0.0011) is less than 0.05, we reject the null hypothesis \( H_0 \).
- We conclude that the suppliers do not provide equal proportions of defective components.

#### (c) Multiple Comparison Test:

To determine if there is an overall best supplier or if one supplier can be eliminated due to poor quality, we perform multiple comparisons using a 0.05 level of significance.

| Comparison | \( |\hat{p}_i - \hat{p}_j| \) | \( CV_{ij} \) | Significant \( \text{Diff} > CV_{ij} \) |
|------------|-------------------------------|--------------|-----------------------------------------|
| A vs. B    |
expand button
Transcribed Image Text:### Analysis of Proportions of Defective Components from Three Suppliers **Background:** Benson Manufacturing is considering ordering electronic components from three different suppliers. The suppliers may differ in terms of quality, specifically in the proportion of defective components. To evaluate the proportion of defective components from the suppliers, Benson requested a sample shipment of 500 components from each supplier. The data on the number of defective components and the number of good components from each supplier is as follows: | Component | Supplier A | Supplier B | Supplier C | |------------|------------|------------|------------| | Good | 483 | 478 | 458 | | Defective | 17 | 22 | 42 | **Objectives:** 1. Formulate the hypotheses to test if the proportion of defective components is equal among the three suppliers. 2. Conduct a hypothesis test using a 0.05 level of significance. 3. Use multiple comparison tests to determine if one supplier can be eliminated based on poor quality. #### (a) Formulate the Hypotheses: - **Null Hypothesis \( H_0 \):** All population proportions of defective components are equal. \( p_A = p_B = p_C \) - **Alternative Hypothesis \( H_3 \):** Not all population proportions of defective components are equal. #### (b) Conduct the Hypothesis Test: Using a 0.05 level of significance: 1. **Test Statistic Calculation:** \[ \chi^2 = 13.703 \] 2. **p-value:** \[ p\text{-value} = 0.0011 \] Conclusion: - Since the p-value (0.0011) is less than 0.05, we reject the null hypothesis \( H_0 \). - We conclude that the suppliers do not provide equal proportions of defective components. #### (c) Multiple Comparison Test: To determine if there is an overall best supplier or if one supplier can be eliminated due to poor quality, we perform multiple comparisons using a 0.05 level of significance. | Comparison | \( |\hat{p}_i - \hat{p}_j| \) | \( CV_{ij} \) | Significant \( \text{Diff} > CV_{ij} \) | |------------|-------------------------------|--------------|-----------------------------------------| | A vs. B |
Expert Solution
Check Mark
Knowledge Booster
Background pattern image
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
Text book image
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:John Wiley & Sons Inc
Text book image
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th...
Statistics
ISBN:9781305251809
Author:Jay L. Devore
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C...
Statistics
ISBN:9781305504912
Author:Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E...
Statistics
ISBN:9780134683416
Author:Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:PEARSON
Text book image
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:9781319042578
Author:David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:W. H. Freeman
Text book image
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:9781319013387
Author:David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:W. H. Freeman