Soil 1 Diameter or Sieve No. Mass Retained Soil 2 Diameter or Sieve No. Mass Retained (g) (g) ¾ in ½ in % in ½ in # 4 #4 15.48 #10 #10 61.92 Sieve #20 #20 112.23 #40 #60 Analysis #40 49.80 30.1 #60 51.10 #100 #100 #200 Pan 36.4 50.31 23.1 #200 27.09 290.3 Pan 19.23 No hydrometer analysis Diameter % Finer Hydrometer Analysis (um) 45 10 61 42 37 1 27

Soil 1 Diameter or Sieve No. Mass Retained Soil 2 Diameter or Sieve No. Mass Retained (g) (g) ¾ in ½ in % in ½ in # 4 #4 15.48 #10 #10 61.92 Sieve #20 #20 112.23 #40 #60 Analysis #40 49.80 30.1 #60 51.10 #100 #100 #200 Pan 36.4 50.31 23.1 #200 27.09 290.3 Pan 19.23 No hydrometer analysis Diameter % Finer Hydrometer Analysis (um) 45 10 61 42 37 1 27

Structural Analysis

6th Edition

ISBN:9781337630931

Author:KASSIMALI, Aslam.

Publisher:KASSIMALI, Aslam.

Chapter2: Loads On Structures

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

4.16 Plot the particle size distribution curve for each of the three soils the data for which are given below. All three curves should be on the same semi logarithmic diagram. Sieve Number 3/4 in ½ in #4 # 10 # 20 # 40 # 60 # 100 # 200 Particle Diameter from Hydrometer Analysis (mm) Lagoon Clay Beufort, SC 0.045 0.010 0.005 0.001 Data from Sowers (1979). 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 95 80 61 42 37 27 % Passing by Weight Beach Sand Daytona Beach, FL 100 100 100 100 100 98 90 10 2 Weathered Tuff Central America 100 98 95 93 88 82 75 72 68 66 33 21 10 4.17 Determine Cu and Ce for each of the three soils in Problem 4.17. Which of these soils is most well-graded? Why?
18. The results for sieve analysis is shown in the following table: Sieve No. 4 10 20 40 60 100 200 % Passing 69.3 59.1 48.3 38.5 28.4 19.8 4.5 Liquid Limit Plastic Limit Non-Plastic (NP) Non-Plastic (NP) a. Determine the classification of soil according to AASHTO. b. Determine the classification of soil according to USCS.
SITUATION 9 The result of sieve analysis of three soils is given next. It is required to classify these soils according to the AASHTO Classification System. Use the attached AASHTO Classification of Highway Subgrade Materials Table. (a) Classification of Soil A. (b) Classification of Soil B. (c) Classification of Soil C. Sieve Analysis Results for Situation 9 Sieve Analysis Sieve Diameter, Percent Passing Number mm. 4.76 90 100 100 8. 2.38 84 90 100 10 2. 72 77 98 20 0.84 66 59 91 40 0.42 58 50 85 60 0.25 50 42 79 100 0.149 44 36 70 200 0.074 38 33 LL 42 46 47 PL 23 29 24 63
The results of the sieve analysis done on a soil are shown below. Sieve No. Diameter Soil A 4 4.760 96 6 2.380 91 10 2.000 89 20 0.840 85 40 0.420 81 60 0.250 78 100 0.149 67 200 0.074 64 LL 40 PL 30 Determine its classification using USCS. ML MH None of the above CL CH
soil mechanic. Classify the soil according to unified soil classification system USCS; if the following data is given : Passing sieve No. 200 =7% / Passing sieve No. 4 = 40% / D10= 0.18, D30= 0.69 and D60= 3/ LL-28%, Pl=19%
1. The following results were obtained in a sieve analysis for three different soils. Classify the soils according to the AASHTO classification system. Soil 1 2 3 No. 10 79 80 95 Percent passing No. 401 62 60 78 No. 200 6 33 45 L.L. 38 36 P.L. N.P. 29 16
The given data shows a sieve analysis of a soil sample. Classify the soil using AASHTO Method. Sieve No. Diameter Percent Passing 4 4.760 100 6 2.380 91 10 2.000 88 20 0.840 76 40 0.420 55 60 0.250 50 100 0.150 47 200 0.075 46 Characteristics of No. 40 Fraction LL 50 PL 34
Following details regarding the particle size distribution and other index properties pertinent to the classification of soil. Choose three soils and classify each soil according to USCS and AASHTO classification systems. When necessary, assume Cu = 4.48 and Cc = 1.22.
2. For the given data, shows a sieve analysis of soil samples A,B, and C. Diameter Soil A Soil B Soil C Sieve No. (mm) %Passing %Passing %Passing # 4 4.760 100 90 100 a. Classify soil sample A using AASHTO Method #8 2.380 97 64 100 #10 2.000 92 54 98 b. Classify soil sample B using AASHTO Method c. Classify soil sample C using #20 0.840 87 34 92 # 40 0.420 53 22 84 #60 0.250 42 17 79 AASHTO Method #100 0.149 26 9. 70 # 200 0.074 17 4 63 LL 35 47 PL 20 24
P2, 5.4 List the given, required, graph and box the final answer.
The given data sohws a sieve analysis of a soild sample. Classify the soild using AASHTO Method. Sieve No. Diameter (mm) Percent Passing No. 4 4.760 96 No. 8 2.380 80 No. 10 2.000 78 No.20 0.840 61 No.40 0.420 56 No. 60 0.250 48 No. 100 0.150 39 No. 200 0.075 33 Characteristics of No. 40 Fraction LL 38 PL 29
5.4 Classify the following soils by using the Unified soil classification system. Give the group symbols and the group names. Sieve analysis- Percent finer Liquid limit Plasticity index C. Soil No. 4 No. 200 C, 1 70 30 33 21 2 48 20 41 22 3 95 70 52 28 4 100 82 30 19 5 100 74 35 21 6. 87 26 38 18 7 88 78 69 38 8 99 57 54 26 (table continues on next page) apter 5: Classification of Soil Sieve analysis- Percent finer Liquid limit Plasticity index C. Soil No. 4 Νo. 200 9 71 11 32 16 4.8 2.9 10 100 NP 7.2 2.2 11 89 65 44 21 12 90 8 39 31 3.9 2.1 © Cengage Leaming 2014