Researchers record the fuel consumption of a car y (in miles per gallon) at various speeds x (in miles per hour). Using software, they determine that the least-squares regression line of their data is  y^=70.243−0.329x       If the observed fuel consumption of the car was y = 49y=49 mpg while moving at a speed of x = 20x=20mph, what would be the error (i.e., residual) in the predicted fuel consumption at this speed found with the least-squares regression line?

Please answer as many as your allowed too. Thank you :) A regression was run to determine if there is a relationship between the happiness index (y) and life expectancy in years of a given country (x).The results of the regression were: ˆyy^=a+bxa=-1.68b=0.168 (a) Write the equation of the Least Squares Regression line of the formˆyy^= + x(b) Which is a possible value for the correlation coefficient, rr? -1.417 1.417 0.702 -0.702 (c) If a country increases its life expectancy, the happiness index will increase decrease (d) If the life expectancy is increased by 0.5 years in a certain country, how much will the happiness index change? Round to two decimal places.(e) Use the regression line to predict the happiness index of a country with a life expectancy of 69 years. Round to two decimal places.

The owner of a movie theater company used multiple regression analysis to predict gross revenue (y) as a function of television advertising (x,) and newspaper advertising (x,). The estimated regression equation was ŷ = 82.1 + 2.23x, + 1.70x2. The computer solution, based on a sample of eight weeks, provided SST = 25.1 and SSR = 23.345. (a) Compute and interpret R2 and R_2. (Round your answers to three decimal places.) . Adjusting for the number of independent variables in the model, the The proportion of the variability in the dependent variable that can be explained by the estimated multiple regression equation is proportion of the variability in the dependent variable that can be explained by the estimated multiple regression equation is

A frequent flyer was interested in the relationship between dollars spent on flying and the distance flown. She sampled 20 frequent flyers of a certain airline. She collected the number of miles flown in the previous year and the total amount of money the flyer spent. A regression line of distance flown on money spent was fit to the data: \hat y = 24000 + 10xy^​=24000+10x. A person who spent $1000 is predicted to have flown: