MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN: 9781119256830
Author: Amos Gilat
Publisher: John Wiley & Sons Inc
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Researchers conducted a study to determine whether magnets are effective in treating back pain. The results are shown in the table below. The results are a measure of reduction in back pain. Assume that the two samples are independent random samples.
Treatment | Sham | |
μ | μ₁ | μ₂ |
n | 18 | 18 |
x̄ | 0.57 | 0.42 |
s | 0.54 | 1.46 |
Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that those treated with magnets have a greater
Determine the test statistic.
Round your answer to 2 decimal places.
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
Step by stepSolved in 2 steps with 1 images
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Use the data below taken from a random sample of adults, and the a = 0.01 level of significance, to determine whether or not there is a significant, positive linear correlation between the length of a person's arm and the amount of money they contribute annually to charity. Which would be correct hypotheses for this test? Sample Data: Ho: p= 0; H₁: p=0 Ho p= 0; H₁: p > 0 Ho : μ = 0; H1 :μ > 0 Ho: p = 0; H₁: p<0 Arm length (cm) Charitable Giving ($) 199 368.6 202 348.74 209 358.41 200 356.72 199 350.71 202 213 193 198 207 208 195 .627 What is the Pearson Correlation Coefficient for the sample data (n)? (Round to three decimals) .029 349.7 374.59 345.04 343.88 358.67 349.41 343.95 Give the P-value: (Round to three decimals) Xarrow_forwardResearchers conducted a study to determine whether magnets are effective in treating back pain. Pain was measured using the visual analog scale, and the results shown below are among the results obtained in the study. Higher scores correspond to greater pain levels. Assume that the two samples are independent simple random samples selected from normally distributed populations, and do not assume that the population standard deviations are equal. Complete parts (a) to (c) below. Reduction in Pain Level After Magnet Treatment (u): n=22, x=0.58, s=0.89 Reduction in Pain Level After Sham Treatment (H2): n=22, x=0.51, s = 1.29 OA. Ho: H₁₂ H₁₁₂ H₁₁arrow_forwardA study was done using a treatment group and a placebo group. The results are shown in the table. Assume that the two samples are independent simple random samples selected from normally distributed populations, and do not assume that the population standard deviations are equal. Complete parts (a) and (b) below. Use a 0.01 significance level for both parts. Treatment Placebo μ μ1 μ2 n 26 32 x 2.38 2.63 s 0.85 0.57 a. Test the claim that the two samples are from populations with the same mean. What are the null and alternative hypotheses? A. H0: μ1<μ2 H1: μ1≥μ2 B. H0: μ1=μ2 H1: μ1≠μ2 Your answer is correct. C. H0: μ1=μ2 H1: μ1>μ2 D. H0: μ1≠μ2 H1: μ1<μ2 The test statistic, t, is negative 1.28−1.28. (Round to two decimal places as needed.) The P-value is 0.2060.206. (Round to three decimal places as needed.) State the conclusion for the test. A.…arrow_forwardMagnet ProblemResearchers conducted a study to determine whether magnets are effective in treating back pain. The results are shown in the table below. The results are a measure of reduction in back pain. Assume that the two samples are independent random samples. Treatment Sham μ μ₁ μ₂ n 21 21 x̄ 0.59 0.45 s 0.52 1.43 Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that those treated with magnets have a greater mean reduction in pain than those given a sham treatment. Determine the test statistic.Round your answer to 2 decimal places.arrow_forwardUse a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that the two samples of Yttrium concentrations (in ppm) are from populations with the same mean. Sample 1 30 X1 = 70.29 S1 22.19 Sample 2 n2 32 X2 = 74.26 S2 18.05 d.f.=29 to.005 = 2.756 to.01 = 2.462 to.025 = 2.045 to.05 = 1.669 to.10 = 1.311arrow_forwardA study was conducted to determine whether magnets were effective in treating pain. The values represent measurements of pain using the visual analog scale. Assume that both samples are independent simple random samples from populations having normal distributions. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that those given a sham treatment have pain reductions that vary more than the pain reductions for those treated with magnets. n x s Sham 20 0.43 1.37 Magnet 20 0.47 0.94 Question content area bottom Part 1 What are the null and alternative hypotheses? A. H0: σ21=σ22 H1: σ21>σ22 Your answer is correct. B. H0: σ21=σ22 H1: σ21<σ22 C. H0: σ21=σ22 H1: σ21≠σ22 D. H0: σ21≠σ22 H1: σ21=σ22 Part 2 Identify the test statistic. F=enter your response here (Round to two decimal places as needed.) Use technology to identify the P-value. What is…arrow_forwardA study was done using a treatment group and a placebo group. The results are shown in the table. Assume that the two samples are independent simple random samples selected from normally distributed populations, and do not assume that the population standard deviations are equal. Complete parts (a) and (b) below. Use a 0.100.10 significance level for both parts. Treatment Placebo μ μ1 μ2 n 27 32 (overbar) x 2.35 2.65 s 0.92 0.57 Test the claim that the two samples are from populations with the same mean. What are the null and alternative hypotheses? The test statistic, t, is _______ The P-value is _______ State the conclusion for the test? Construct a confidence interval suitable for testing the claim that the two samples are from populations with the same mean______ <μ1 − μ2 < ______arrow_forwardA study was conducted to determine whether magnets were effective in treating pain. The values represent measurements of pain using the visual analog scale. Assume that both samples are independent simple random samples from populations having normal distributions. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that those given a sham treatment have pain reductions that vary more than the pain reductions for those treated with magnets. What are the null and alternative hypotheses? OA. Ho: 002 H₁:0² = 0²/2 OC. H₂:0²=0²2 H₁:0² > 0²/2 Identify the test statistic. F = (Round to two decimal places as needed.) Use technology to identify the P-value. The P-value is (Round to three decimal places as needed.) What is the conclusion for this hypothesis test? C OB. H₁: 0 = 0² H₁:0² +03 OD. H₂:0²=0²2 H₁:0² <0²/ O A. Reject Ho. There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that those given a sham treatment have pain reductions that vary more than those treated with magnets. O B. Fail to reject…arrow_forwardResearchers conducted a study to determine whether magnets are effective in treating back pain. Pain was measured using the visual analog scale, and the results shown below are among the results obtained in the study. Higher scores correspond to greater pain levels. Assume that the two samples are independent simple random samples selected from normally distributed populations, and do not assume that the population standard deviations are equal. Complete parts (a) to (c) below. Reduction in Pain Level After Magnet Treatment (μ₁): n = 15, x=0.45, s=1.02 Reduction in Pain Level After Sham Treatment (2): n = 15, x=0.38, s=1.55 a. Use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that those treated with magnets have a greater mean reduction in pain than those given a sham treatment (similar to a placebo). What are the null and alternative hypotheses? OA. Ho H1 H2 oc Hoi HH2 H₁: H1 H2 B. Ho: H1 H2 H₁₁₂ OD. Ho H1 H2 The test statistic, t, is (Round to two decimal places as needed.)arrow_forwardUse formulas to solve this and also with explainationarrow_forwardThe following score are from an independent-measures study comparing two treatment conditions. a. Use an independent-measures t test with α=.05 to determine whether there is a significant mean difference between the two treatments. b. Use an ANOVA with α=.05 to determine whether there is a significant difference between the two treatments. Treatment I II 1 12 6 5 N=8 6 6 G=48 3 9 ΣX2=368arrow_forwardReject or Fail to Reject the null hypothesis. There is or is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that those treated with magnets have a greater mean reduction in pain than those given a sham treatment.arrow_forwardarrow_back_iosSEE MORE QUESTIONSarrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
- MATLAB: An Introduction with ApplicationsStatisticsISBN:9781119256830Author:Amos GilatPublisher:John Wiley & Sons IncProbability and Statistics for Engineering and th...StatisticsISBN:9781305251809Author:Jay L. DevorePublisher:Cengage LearningStatistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C...StatisticsISBN:9781305504912Author:Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. WallnauPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E...StatisticsISBN:9780134683416Author:Ron Larson, Betsy FarberPublisher:PEARSONThe Basic Practice of StatisticsStatisticsISBN:9781319042578Author:David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. FlignerPublisher:W. H. FreemanIntroduction to the Practice of StatisticsStatisticsISBN:9781319013387Author:David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. CraigPublisher:W. H. Freeman
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th...
Statistics
ISBN:9781305251809
Author:Jay L. Devore
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C...
Statistics
ISBN:9781305504912
Author:Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E...
Statistics
ISBN:9780134683416
Author:Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:9781319042578
Author:David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:9781319013387
Author:David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:W. H. Freeman