Homework Help is Here – Start Your Trial Now!
Math
Statistics
PROBLEM STATEMENT 4 Suppose that a fast-food chain having four branches in a certain geographical area wants to evaluate the service at these restaurants. The customer services director for the chain hires 24 investigators with varied experiences in food-service evaluations to act as raters. After preliminary consultations, the 24 investigators are stratified into six blocks of four-based on food service evaluation experience-so that the four most experienced investigators are placed in block | 1, the next four most experienced investigators are placed in block 2, and so on. Within each of the six homogenous blocks, the four raters are then randomly assigned to evaluate the service at a particular restaurant using a rating scale from 0 (low) to 100 (high). The results are summarized in the table shown below. RESTAURANTS B BLOCKS OF A C D RATERS 1 70 61 82 74 2 3 77 76 75 67 88 90 76 80 80 84 63 66 96 92 76 84 4 5 78 68 98 86 Use a 0.01 level of significance to test the hypothesis that (a) service performance of the four restaurants are equal; (b) there is no significant differences among the raters. HYPOTHESIS The rating of the investigators in the four restaurants are being compared in terms of two factors: • Differences in the rating of the raters (investigators) • Differences in the food-service performance of the restaurants Thus, the hypotheses are: Ho: На: Но: |На: Test at a= 0.01 Critical Region: F1 > F;> at vi = at vi = v2 = V2 =

PROBLEM STATEMENT 4 Suppose that a fast-food chain having four branches in a certain geographical area wants to evaluate the service at these restaurants. The customer services director for the chain hires 24 investigators with varied experiences in food-service evaluations to act as raters. After preliminary consultations, the 24 investigators are stratified into six blocks of four-based on food service evaluation experience-so that the four most experienced investigators are placed in block | 1, the next four most experienced investigators are placed in block 2, and so on. Within each of the six homogenous blocks, the four raters are then randomly assigned to evaluate the service at a particular restaurant using a rating scale from 0 (low) to 100 (high). The results are summarized in the table shown below. RESTAURANTS B BLOCKS OF A C D RATERS 1 70 61 82 74 2 3 77 76 75 67 88 90 76 80 80 84 63 66 96 92 76 84 4 5 78 68 98 86 Use a 0.01 level of significance to test the hypothesis that (a) service performance of the four restaurants are equal; (b) there is no significant differences among the raters. HYPOTHESIS The rating of the investigators in the four restaurants are being compared in terms of two factors: • Differences in the rating of the raters (investigators) • Differences in the food-service performance of the restaurants Thus, the hypotheses are: Ho: На: Но: |На: Test at a= 0.01 Critical Region: F1 > F;> at vi = at vi = v2 = V2 =

Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897, 0079039898, 2018
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897, 0079039898, 2018
18th Edition
ISBN:9780079039897
Author:Carter
Publisher:Carter
Chapter10: Statistics
Section10.6: Summarizing Categorical Data
Problem 25PPS
See similar textbooks
icon
Related questions
Question
100%

I really need help with this problem! Thank you very much!

ASSUMPTIONS 1. The populations from which the samples are taken have a normal distribution. 2. The populations have the same variance or standard deviation 3. The samples have randomly-picked members and that the samples are independent of each other. 4. No interacting effect between the subjects and the students CALCULATIONS Sum of Degree of freedom Computed Source of variation Mean square P squares Raters Restaurants Error Total ANALYSIS CONCLUSION
Transcribed Image Text:ASSUMPTIONS 1. The populations from which the samples are taken have a normal distribution. 2. The populations have the same variance or standard deviation 3. The samples have randomly-picked members and that the samples are independent of each other. 4. No interacting effect between the subjects and the students CALCULATIONS Sum of Degree of freedom Computed Source of variation Mean square P squares Raters Restaurants Error Total ANALYSIS CONCLUSION
PROBLEM STATEMENT 4 Suppose that a fast-food chain having four branches in a certain geographical area wants to evaluate the service at these restaurants. The customer services director for the chain hires 24 investigators with varied experiences in food-service evaluations to act as raters. After preliminary consultations, the 24 investigators are stratified into six blocks of four-based on food service evaluation experience-so that the four most experienced investigators are placed in block 1, the next four most experienced investigators are placed in block 2, and so on. Within each of the six homogenous blocks, the four raters are then randomly assigned to evaluate the service at a particular restaurant using a rating scale from 0 (low) to 100 (high). The results are summarized in the table shown below. RESTAURANTS BLOCKS OF A. B RATERS 1 70 61 82 74 2 77 75 88 76 3 76 67 90 80 4 80 63 96 76 5 84 66 92 84 78 68 98 86 Use a 0.01 level of significance to test the hypothesis that (a) service performance of the four restaurants are equal; (b) there is no significant differences among the raters. НYРОТHESIS The rating of the investigators in the four restaurants are being compared in terms of two factors: Differences in the rating of the raters (investigators) • Differences in the food-service performance of the restaurants Thus, the hypotheses are: Ho: На: Но: На: Test at a= 0.01 Critical Region: F; > F1> V2 = v2 = at vi = at vi =
Transcribed Image Text:PROBLEM STATEMENT 4 Suppose that a fast-food chain having four branches in a certain geographical area wants to evaluate the service at these restaurants. The customer services director for the chain hires 24 investigators with varied experiences in food-service evaluations to act as raters. After preliminary consultations, the 24 investigators are stratified into six blocks of four-based on food service evaluation experience-so that the four most experienced investigators are placed in block 1, the next four most experienced investigators are placed in block 2, and so on. Within each of the six homogenous blocks, the four raters are then randomly assigned to evaluate the service at a particular restaurant using a rating scale from 0 (low) to 100 (high). The results are summarized in the table shown below. RESTAURANTS BLOCKS OF A. B RATERS 1 70 61 82 74 2 77 75 88 76 3 76 67 90 80 4 80 63 96 76 5 84 66 92 84 78 68 98 86 Use a 0.01 level of significance to test the hypothesis that (a) service performance of the four restaurants are equal; (b) there is no significant differences among the raters. НYРОТHESIS The rating of the investigators in the four restaurants are being compared in terms of two factors: Differences in the rating of the raters (investigators) • Differences in the food-service performance of the restaurants Thus, the hypotheses are: Ho: На: Но: На: Test at a= 0.01 Critical Region: F; > F1> V2 = v2 = at vi = at vi =
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 4 steps with 1 images

SEE SOLUTIONCheck out a sample Q&A here
Blurred answer
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897…
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897…
Algebra
ISBN:
9780079039897
Author:
Carter
Publisher:
McGraw Hill
SEE MORE TEXTBOOKS