Problem 13-25 (Algo) Certainty equivalent approach [LO13-1) Sheila Goodman recently received her MBA from the Harvard Business School. She has joined the family business, Goodman Software Products Incorporated, as Vice-President of Finance. She believes in adjusting projects for risk. Her father is somewhat skeptical but agrees to go along with her. Her approach is somewhat different than the risk-adjusted discount rate approach, but achieves the same objective. She suggests that the inflows for each year of a project be adjusted downward for lack of certainty and then be discounted back at a risk-free rate. The theory is that the adjustment penalty makes the inflows the equivalent of risk-less inflows, and therefore a risk-free rate is justified. A table showing the possible coefficient of variation for an inflow and the associated adjustment factor is shown next; Coefficient of Variation 0 -0.25 0.26 0.50 0.51 0.75 0.76 1.00 1.01 1.25 Assume a $173,000 project provides the following inflows with the associated coefficients of variation for each year. Coefficient of Variation 0.11 Year 1 Inflow. $ 39,600 56,500 79,700 61,700 61,700 Use Appendix B for an approximate answer but calculate your final answer using the formula and financial calculator methods. Adjustment Factor 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 2 3 4 5 Year 1 2 0.24 0.55 0.79 1.04 a. Fill in the table below: Note: Do not round intermediate calculations. Round "Adjustment Factor" answers to 2 decimal places and other answers to the nearest whole dollar. Adjustment Factor Adjusted Inflow

Corporate Fin Focused Approach
5th Edition
ISBN:9781285660516
Author:EHRHARDT
Publisher:EHRHARDT
Chapter15: Capital Structure Decisions
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 12SP
icon
Related questions
Question

Vaibhav 

Problem 13-25 (Algo) Certainty equivalent approach [LO13-1]
Sheila Goodman recently received her MBA from the Harvard Business School. She has joined the family business, Goodman Software
Products Incorporated, as Vice-President of Finance. She believes in adjusting projects for risk. Her father is somewhat skeptical but
agrees to go along with her. Her approach is somewhat different than the risk-adjusted discount rate approach, but achieves the same
objective. She suggests that the inflows for each year of a project be adjusted downward for lack of certainty and then be discounted
back at a risk-free rate. The theory is that the adjustment penalty makes the inflows the equivalent of risk-less inflows, and therefore a
risk-free rate is justified.
A table showing the possible coefficient of variation for an inflow and the associated adjustment factor is shown next:
Coefficient of
Variation
0 0.25
8.26 0.50
0.51 -0.75
0.76 1.00
1.01 1.25
Year
1
Assume a $173,000 project provides the following inflows with the associated coefficients of variation for each year.
Coefficient of
Variation
0.11
0.24
0.55
0.79
1.04
Adjustment
Factor
0.90
Inflow
$ 39,600
56,500
79,700
61,700
61,700
Use Appendix B for an approximate answer but calculate your final answer using the formula and financial calculator methods.
a. Fill in the table below.
Note: Do not round intermediate calculations. Round "Adjustment Factor" answers to 2 decimal places and other answers to the
nearest whole dollar.
2
3
4
15
0.80
0.70
0.60
e.se
Year
1
2
3
Adjustment Factor Adjusted Inflow
Transcribed Image Text:Problem 13-25 (Algo) Certainty equivalent approach [LO13-1] Sheila Goodman recently received her MBA from the Harvard Business School. She has joined the family business, Goodman Software Products Incorporated, as Vice-President of Finance. She believes in adjusting projects for risk. Her father is somewhat skeptical but agrees to go along with her. Her approach is somewhat different than the risk-adjusted discount rate approach, but achieves the same objective. She suggests that the inflows for each year of a project be adjusted downward for lack of certainty and then be discounted back at a risk-free rate. The theory is that the adjustment penalty makes the inflows the equivalent of risk-less inflows, and therefore a risk-free rate is justified. A table showing the possible coefficient of variation for an inflow and the associated adjustment factor is shown next: Coefficient of Variation 0 0.25 8.26 0.50 0.51 -0.75 0.76 1.00 1.01 1.25 Year 1 Assume a $173,000 project provides the following inflows with the associated coefficients of variation for each year. Coefficient of Variation 0.11 0.24 0.55 0.79 1.04 Adjustment Factor 0.90 Inflow $ 39,600 56,500 79,700 61,700 61,700 Use Appendix B for an approximate answer but calculate your final answer using the formula and financial calculator methods. a. Fill in the table below. Note: Do not round intermediate calculations. Round "Adjustment Factor" answers to 2 decimal places and other answers to the nearest whole dollar. 2 3 4 15 0.80 0.70 0.60 e.se Year 1 2 3 Adjustment Factor Adjusted Inflow
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps with 3 images

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Financial Policy and Growth
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, finance and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Corporate Fin Focused Approach
Corporate Fin Focused Approach
Finance
ISBN:
9781285660516
Author:
EHRHARDT
Publisher:
Cengage
Entrepreneurial Finance
Entrepreneurial Finance
Finance
ISBN:
9781337635653
Author:
Leach
Publisher:
Cengage