Performance Measurements for manufacturing electric bus what Methods are selected and rationale for cost, schedule, technical monitoring for manufacturing electric bus Major risk assessments and mitigation plans for manufacturing electric buses

Performance Measurements for manufacturing electric bus what Methods are selected and rationale for cost, schedule, technical monitoring for manufacturing electric bus Major risk assessments and mitigation plans for manufacturing electric buses

Purchasing and Supply Chain Management

6th Edition

ISBN:9781285869681

Author:Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. Patterson

Publisher:Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. Patterson

ChapterC: Cases

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 5.4SA

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Scenario 4 Sharon Gillespie, a new buyer at Visionex, Inc., was reviewing quotations for a tooling contract submitted by four suppliers. She was evaluating the quotes based on price, target quality levels, and delivery lead time promises. As she was working, her manager, Dave Cox, entered her office. He asked how everything was progressing and if she needed any help. She mentioned she was reviewing quotations from suppliers for a tooling contract. Dave asked who the interested suppliers were and if she had made a decision. Sharon indicated that one supplier, Apex, appeared to fit exactly the requirements Visionex had specified in the proposal. Dave told her to keep up the good work. Later that day Dave again visited Sharons office. He stated that he had done some research on the suppliers and felt that another supplier, Micron, appeared to have the best track record with Visionex. He pointed out that Sharons first choice was a new supplier to Visionex and there was some risk involved with that choice. Dave indicated that it would please him greatly if she selected Micron for the contract. The next day Sharon was having lunch with another buyer, Mark Smith. She mentioned the conversation with Dave and said she honestly felt that Apex was the best choice. When Mark asked Sharon who Dave preferred, she answered, Micron. At that point Mark rolled his eyes and shook his head. Sharon asked what the body language was all about. Mark replied, Look, I know youre new but you should know this. I heard last week that Daves brother-in-law is a new part owner of Micron. I was wondering how soon it would be before he started steering business to that company. He is not the straightest character. Sharon was shocked. After a few moments, she announced that her original choice was still the best selection. At that point Mark reminded Sharon that she was replacing a terminated buyer who did not go along with one of Daves previous preferred suppliers. Ethical decisions that affect a buyers ethical perspective usually involve the organizational environment, cultural environment, personal environment, and industry environment. Analyze this scenario using these four variables.
Scenario 4 Sharon Gillespie, a new buyer at Visionex, Inc., was reviewing quotations for a tooling contract submitted by four suppliers. She was evaluating the quotes based on price, target quality levels, and delivery lead time promises. As she was working, her manager, Dave Cox, entered her office. He asked how everything was progressing and if she needed any help. She mentioned she was reviewing quotations from suppliers for a tooling contract. Dave asked who the interested suppliers were and if she had made a decision. Sharon indicated that one supplier, Apex, appeared to fit exactly the requirements Visionex had specified in the proposal. Dave told her to keep up the good work. Later that day Dave again visited Sharons office. He stated that he had done some research on the suppliers and felt that another supplier, Micron, appeared to have the best track record with Visionex. He pointed out that Sharons first choice was a new supplier to Visionex and there was some risk involved with that choice. Dave indicated that it would please him greatly if she selected Micron for the contract. The next day Sharon was having lunch with another buyer, Mark Smith. She mentioned the conversation with Dave and said she honestly felt that Apex was the best choice. When Mark asked Sharon who Dave preferred, she answered, Micron. At that point Mark rolled his eyes and shook his head. Sharon asked what the body language was all about. Mark replied, Look, I know youre new but you should know this. I heard last week that Daves brother-in-law is a new part owner of Micron. I was wondering how soon it would be before he started steering business to that company. He is not the straightest character. Sharon was shocked. After a few moments, she announced that her original choice was still the best selection. At that point Mark reminded Sharon that she was replacing a terminated buyer who did not go along with one of Daves previous preferred suppliers. What should Sharon do in this situation?
Scenario 4 Sharon Gillespie, a new buyer at Visionex, Inc., was reviewing quotations for a tooling contract submitted by four suppliers. She was evaluating the quotes based on price, target quality levels, and delivery lead time promises. As she was working, her manager, Dave Cox, entered her office. He asked how everything was progressing and if she needed any help. She mentioned she was reviewing quotations from suppliers for a tooling contract. Dave asked who the interested suppliers were and if she had made a decision. Sharon indicated that one supplier, Apex, appeared to fit exactly the requirements Visionex had specified in the proposal. Dave told her to keep up the good work. Later that day Dave again visited Sharons office. He stated that he had done some research on the suppliers and felt that another supplier, Micron, appeared to have the best track record with Visionex. He pointed out that Sharons first choice was a new supplier to Visionex and there was some risk involved with that choice. Dave indicated that it would please him greatly if she selected Micron for the contract. The next day Sharon was having lunch with another buyer, Mark Smith. She mentioned the conversation with Dave and said she honestly felt that Apex was the best choice. When Mark asked Sharon who Dave preferred, she answered, Micron. At that point Mark rolled his eyes and shook his head. Sharon asked what the body language was all about. Mark replied, Look, I know youre new but you should know this. I heard last week that Daves brother-in-law is a new part owner of Micron. I was wondering how soon it would be before he started steering business to that company. He is not the straightest character. Sharon was shocked. After a few moments, she announced that her original choice was still the best selection. At that point Mark reminded Sharon that she was replacing a terminated buyer who did not go along with one of Daves previous preferred suppliers. What does the Institute of Supply Management code of ethics say about financial conflicts of interest?
Performance Measurements for manufacturing electric buswhat Methods are selected and rationale for cost, schedule, technical monitoring for manufacturing electric busMajor risk assessments and mitigation plans for manufacturing electric bus
identified the challenge of variety risk and purpose solution using Plan-Do-Check-Act cycle.
Design Within Reach (DWR) Design Within Reach (DWR) is one of the leading hardwood furniture manufacturers. While DWR has many small competitors, none of them controls a significant market share. Like most furniture manufacturers, DWR sells its products to a wide variety of small furniture stores, none of which represents a large percentage of DWR's sales. DWR can choose among many wood (an undifferentiated commodity) suppliers to find the best price and delivery. The growth rate of the hardwood furniture industry has slowed considerably in recent years. Many consumers purchase "IKEA type" furniture made of composite wood, which is substantially less expensive than hardwood furniture. The level of direct competition in the hardwood furniture industry can best be described as moderate because the slowing growth rate offsets the numerous firms in the industry. low because of the numerous firms in the industry and the slowing growth rate low because of the slowing growth rate and the…
Analyse the risk of customer dissatisfaction with Cause and Effect Diagram for logistics service provider.
Explain Problem Analysis (SPC Tools)?
Describe the process of model identification and system parameter estimation and its significance in real-world applications.
QoS levels in response time, availability, and security may be used to evaluate the AIT Lemass's performance. Talk about ways to improve service in any of the assessed categories.
Discuss the various methods for system identification and parameter estimation.
Case Study: Light House Insurance Company: Help Me Make It Through the Night The Lighthouse Insurance Company was founded in 1970. It is engaged in selling nonlife policies specifically those related to fire and allied lines, motor car, marine, personal accident, bonds, and miscellaneous lines. The company is a stock corporation with 51 branches all over the Philippines from Northern Luzon to Southern Mindanao. It employs a total of 305 employees manning the head office in Makati City and all the branches. The company’s Human Resource Department is composed of five employees including its head, Ms. Emerenciana Soriano. The department maintains a file of the company’s record of personnel. The branch managers are responsible for recruiting branch personnel who are trained at the head office from one week to one month. When the position of branch manager (BM) becomes vacant, the general manager pulls someone out from the Marketing Department to fill the…