Part I:Wage, Gender, Education, and Experience:Consider the following model:wageBo+B₁female + B₂ (educ≥6) + 83 experience + u. (1)where wage is the hourly wage in U.S. dollars. (educ≥6] is a dummy variable that equals 1 if an individualhas 6 or more years of education and equals zero otherwise. For example, [educ≥6]=1 for an individualwith 7 years of education, and [educ≥6]=0 for an individual with 3 years of education. experience is thenumber of years of experience an individual has. female is a dummy variable that equals 1 for female andequals 0 for male.An OLS regression for the above model gives us:wage = 9.50 0.11 female + 0.08 * [educ> 6] +0.03 * experience.(2.75) (0.05)(0.03)(0.01)where the numbers in parentheses (below the coefficients) are the standard errors.DQuestion 1Obtain the predicted wage for a female with 7 years of education and 7 years of experience (round to 2 decimal places). Question 2What is the estimated wage difference between:• a female with 4 years of education and 9 years of experience, and• a male with 8 years of education and 10 years of experience? (round to 2 decimal places).

Question 1:To calculate the predicted wage for a female with 7 years of education and 7 years of…

Answered: Part I: Wage, Gender, Education, and…

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Consider the population regression of log earnings [Y;, where Y,= In(Earnings,;)] against two binary variables: whether a worker is married (D₁, where D₁;= 1 if the th person is married) and the worker's gender (D2;, where D₂;= 1 if the th person is female), and the product of the two binary variables Y₁ = Po+B₁D₁+P₂D2i + P3 (D₁¡ × D₂i) + Hi- The interaction term: O A. indicates the effect of being married on log earnings. B. does not make sense since it could be zero for married males. C. allows the population effect on log earnings of being married to depend on gender. D. cannot be estimated without the presence of a continuous variable.
Suppose we are interested in evaluating the impact on wages of being a college graduate and of residing in California. To this end we define the following dummy variables if college graduate if not college graduate coll = ncoll = if not college graduate if college graduate 1 cali = if residing in California S 1 if not residing in California ncali = if not residing in California if residing in California and for wages denoting yearly wages, we estimate the following model of returns to education wages = B1 coll+ B2ncoll + B3 cali + B4(coll x cali) + e where E[e|coll, cali] = 0. Which parameter or combination of parameters measures the increase in expected wages from obtaining a college degree (comparing to not having a college degree) when residing California? O a. None of the other options is correct O b. Bi – B2 O c. B1 – B2 + ß4 O d. B4 O e. Bi + B3 – ßi – B4 O f. Bi + B4 – ß2 – B4 Clear my choice
The question is the last bolded test. You need the previous questions to answer the last. Thank you for your time and help. You are the manager of a firm that sells CR2032 batteries for car key fobs and other electronic goods. You typically sell the fobs for $7 for a four-pack and sell an average of 27,192 four-packs per month. Due to increased labor costs, you decide to raise the price to $9 per four-pack. When you do this your monthly sales fall to 22,248 four-packs Assuming that your firm’s demand function is linear (i.e., takes the form ), calculate the linear demand function 22,248-27,192/9-7= -4944/2= -2472 Demand equation as 27,192 = a-2472(7) => a=27192+17304 =>a=44,496 27192= -2472x7+b 27192= -17304+b 27192+17304=44,496 Demand function is Q= -2472P+44,496 . Using the demand function that you estimated in the previous problem Calculate demand and total revenue when the price is $7 Q= -2472x7+44,496= -17,304+44,496= 27,192 Total revenue=PxQ=7x27,192=…
Consider the following panel model to examine the effect of retirement on consumption expenditure, consit, of individual i over years t=1,…,3: (B1) log⁡(consit) = β0 + β1retiredit + β2ageit + β3marriedit + β4healthit + δ1Yr2t + δ2Yr3t + ai + uit Where: retiredit is a dummy variable equal to 1 if individual i is retired on year t and 0 otherwise ageit is the individual's age in years marriedit is an indicator variable for whether the individual is married (1) or not (0) in year t healthit is an indicator variable equal to 1 if the individual is in 'good health' and 0 otherwise Yr2 is a dummy variable equal to 1 in year t=2 and 0 otherwise Yr3 is a dummy variable equal to 1 in year t=3 and 0 otherwise We obtain the following results when we estimate Model (B1) using RE and FE methods: Variable Random Effects Fixed Effects retired -0.072*** (0.024) -0.054** (0.025) age -0.008*** (0.003) - married 0.031*** (0.010) 0.028 (0.022) health 0.050*** (0.021) 0.052***…
9
A tax on Cigarettes introduced in Mexico in 2012 increased the price of Cigarettes by about 10%. An evaluation of the first two years of this measure found that Cigarette consumption fell on average by 7.6%, with a larger decrease (11.7%) in low income households. The study also estimated an increase in consumption of alternatives to smoking, particularly Nicotine patches, of 2.1% (AYA, 2017) Explain factors that determine responsiveness to a price increase. Which of these factors might explain the difference in the economy and low income households?
You are given a sample of 600 working individuals, with data on their location and earnings. You construct the following model: wage=Bo+Binorth+u, where the dependent variable is the annual earnings (wage) in $1,000. The explanatory variable is north (which equals one if a worker lives in the north, and equals zero otherwise). An OLS regression yields B 24.8. B₁ = 2.1. = As we have learned in class, education matters a lot in explaining wages-more years of education lead to higher wages. In the above econometric model, education belongs to the error term, u. We also know that in our population of interest, workers in the north have lower drop-out rates than workers in the south. These facts imply that B₁ is biased and inconsistent because the estimation is subject to omitted variable bias. The correct model should be: wage Bo+Binorth + B₂educ + e, where educ denotes the number of years of education. The OLS estimate of B1 from our incorrect model presented at the beginning of this…
1. Suppose output (Q) is related to labor (L) and capital (K) in the following nonlinear way: Q = albKc When taking log to this equation, it is transformed into a linear LnQ = Ina + b In(L) + c Ln (K) One hundred twenty-three observations are used to obtain the following regression results: Dependant Variable: Observations: Variable Intercept L K Q 123 5.5215 Parameter Standard Estimate error 0.650 R-square 0.350 0.7547 0.9750 0.2950 0.1450 F-ratio 184.56 t-ratio 5.66 2.20 2.41 p-value on F 0.00001 p-value 0.0001 0.0295 0.0173 a. Write the regression equation based on the output either in the transformed linear form or the original non-linear form.
A few minutes ago, Joe Doe learned that his company was having a bad year and thus merit salary increases will be smaller than expected. His division’s budget has been set and so he knows that he will receive a salary increase of $400 over his present salary. Joe Doe has also been offered a transfer to another division in the company. He is unsure of the salary situation in the other division. However, his best information leads him to conclude that if he took the new job, there is a 60% chance that he would receive a salary increase of $600 over his present salary, and a 40% chance that he would receive only a $150 increase over his present salary. To summarize, Joe Doe can either stick with his current job and get a salary increase of $400, or take a transfer to a new job and get a salary increase of either $600 with a 60% probability, or $150 with a 40% probability. Amount ($X) Value (v($X)) $0 -5 $150 -2.5 $200 -2 $300 0 $350 0.5 $400 1 $600 1.85…
How do you interpret the R-squared obtained from running this regression?
Assume that the coefficient estimated in the second regression is correct. Forget about the effect of the Return variable, whose effect seems small and statistically insignificant. Calculate the correlation between Female and In(MarketValue) using the omitted variable bias equation. Let X Female, u=MarketValue, and =0.51. The correlation between Female and In(MarketValue), Px is -0.333. (Round your response to three decimal places.) Are large firms more likely to have female top executives than small firms? A. Yes. B. There is no relationship between the genders. C. No.
When labor usage is at 12units, the output is 36 units. From this, we may infer that. A) the marginal product of labor is 3 b) the total product of labor is 1/3 c)the average product of labor is 3 d) none of the above

SEE MORE QUESTIONS

Recommended textbooks for you

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

Economics

ISBN:

9780190931919

Author:

NEWNAN

Publisher:

Oxford University Press

Principles of Economics (12th Edition)

Economics

ISBN:

9780134078779

Author:

Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster

Publisher:

PEARSON

Engineering Economy (17th Edition)

Economics

ISBN:

9780134870069

Author:

William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling

Publisher:

PEARSON

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

Economics

ISBN:

9780190931919

Author:

NEWNAN

Publisher:

Oxford University Press

Principles of Economics (12th Edition)

Economics

ISBN:

9780134078779

Author:

Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster

Publisher:

PEARSON

Engineering Economy (17th Edition)

Economics

ISBN:

9780134870069

Author:

William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling

Publisher:

PEARSON

Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)

Economics

ISBN:

9781305585126

Author:

N. Gregory Mankiw

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach

Economics

ISBN:

9781337106665

Author:

Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…

Economics

ISBN:

9781259290619

Author:

Michael Baye, Jeff Prince

Publisher:

McGraw-Hill Education

SEE MORE TEXTBOOKS