Part 1. Suppose that you overhear a foursome of physicians on the golf course discussing the prices they charge for an office visit. Suppose further that you hear them reach an agreement to all charge a fee of $ 100 for an office visit. What is such an agreement called in antitrust policy, and what antitrust law may have been violated? Part 2. Suppose that emergency room services in the city of Frederiksberg are provided by three hospitals. Two of the hospitals each have a market share of 40% and the third hospital has a market share of 20%. The two largest hospitals plan to merge. Compute the pre-merger and post -merger HHI for this market. Based on the hospital merger guidelines, would this merger likely be challenged by the antitrust authorities?

Consider the only electric company in a small town, which you can assume operates as a natural monopoly. The following graph shows the demand curve for electricity services per month, as well as the provider's marginal revenue (MR) curve, marginal cost (MC) curve, and average total cost (ATC) curve. Suppose the government has elected not to impose regulations on the industry, and so the firm faces no regulatory constraints in maximizing profits. Complete the first row of the following table. Pricing Mechanism Short Run Long - Run Decision Quantity Price Profit (Subscriptions) (Dollars per subscription) Profit Maximization Marginal - Cost Pricing Average - Cost Pricing Suppose now that the government decides to require the monopolist to set its price equal to marginal cost. Complete the second row of the previous table. Suppose now that the government decides to require the monopolist to set its price equal to average total cost. Complete the third row of the previous table. True or…

According to the Federal Trade Commission, “Many mergers benefit competition and consumers by allowing firms to operate more efficiently. But some mergers change market dynamics in ways that can lead to higher prices, fewer or lower-quality goods or services, or less innovation.” Antitrust laws often allow the former pro-competitive types of mergers, but prohibit the latter anti-competitive types. Suppose that one looks over the historical record of antitrust enforcement and finds that while the authorities have permitted some mergers and blocked others, the industry’s average price has tended to fall whenever a merger has been permitted and occurred. a) Based solely on the information provided above, is it correct then to infer that the antitrust authorities should have been more lenient and permitted more mergers? Why or why not? b) Based solely on the information in the question, is it likely that these merged firms sell products that are substitutes or complements? Why

Help Z Quiz (Ch. 11) Question 7 chadron.instructure.com O Microsoft won and its practices were not classified as restrictive. How would you calculate The Microsoft antitrust case covered in your textbook embodies many of the gray areas in restrictive practices. Antitrust regulators accused Microsoft of numerous offenses. What was the end result? Ć 1 pts O The federal government regulators finally dropped their case because the case was too complex to prove. O Microsoft appealed a federal court decision to break up the company and reached a settlement with the government that it would end its restrictive practices. O The federal government won its case, and Microsoft was broken into several smaller companies.