OSI model

In a few phrases, explain any four characteristics that are particularly salient in systems of systems.

Nevertheless, the OSI model assumes more layers than the vast majority of actual computer systems have. Due to the inherent nature of computer systems, this is the case. You should use as few layers as feasible. Can you name any possible downsides to reducing the overall number of layers?

Although the OSI model is useful, the technology behind today's computers prevents it from being fully implemented. Less layers that are more straightforward need less upkeep. What are some potential problems that may arise if we employed fewer layers?

Yet, most practical computer systems do not have as many levels as the OSI model suggests. This is due of a feature built into computers themselves. Keep the level count as low as possible. Is there anything we need to worry about if we cut down on the overall number of layers?

The challenge of multitasking on a single system is challenging. Why not use a real-world scenario and a real-time machine to illustrate the issue?

If a large computer process or program is broken down into smaller ones, do the resulting subsystems still make sense? What benefits does this approach to system partitioning have?

Yet, in contrast to the vast majority of actual computer systems, the OSI model assumes a higher number of levels. The reason for this is inherent in the nature of computing systems. Avoid utilizing as many layers as you can if at all feasible. If we cut down on the overall number of layers, what are some of the possible problems we could encounter?

What is the difference between top-down and bottom-up processing? Write your own example for each of them.

The OSI model requires more layers than are present in most computer systems today. Why not try to limit the number of moving parts? What kinds of issues may arise from having fewer layers?