Or is this not the case at all? Are UDP and IP both equally unstable? What do you think the cause of this is?

For TCP to work, it requires all parties - essentially all the endpoint operating systems - to be honest.  Are there any possible cheats in TCP, how could one instance benefit itself - relative to other endpoints?

What is the purpose of UDP? If user programs were allowed to send only raw IP packets, would it not have sufficed to leave it at that?

Imagine for a moment that the desktop of your computer is completely covered with FIN WAIT 1 TCP connections, and that you have a large number of these connections. Is there a certain outcome that is more likely to take place than the others? Who precisely is to blame for this situation?

Investigate the differences between UDP and TCP to grasp its benefits.

There is a potential that the OSI model and the TCP/IP model will be able to help us understand and communicate information about connections and information transfers (the internet).Do any of these models strike you as being even somewhat familiar?

Why does today's Internet use TCP instead of UDP to transmit voice and video data?

Is there a materially different level of unreliability between IP and UDP, and if so, what constitutes that difference? Is there a reason for this, or is it simply something that happened by chance?

Answer the following questions:a. In what way could TCP be considered a better protocol for implementing the transport layer than UDP? In what way could UDP be considered better than TCP? b. What is the significance of certificate authorities in public-key encryption? c. In what sense does the global nature of the Internet limit legal solutions to Internet problems?

Both UDP and IP may have the same degree of unreliability. Could you explain the thinking behind this?