Google in China
Introduction Using servers located in the United States, Google began offering a Chinese-language version of Google.com in 2000. The site, however, was frequently unavailable or slow because of censoring by the Chinese government. Google obtained a significant share of searches in China but lagged behind market leader Baidu.com. To achieve commercial success, Google concluded that it was imperative to host a Web site from within China. Given its motto, “Don’t Be Evil,” Google had to decide whether to operate from within China or to continue to rely on Google.com. If it decided to establish operations in China, the company had to decide how to deal with the censorship imposed by the Chinese government. As a result of an extensive debate within the company, cofounder Serge Brin explained their decision: “We gradually came to the realization that we were hurting not just ourselves but the Chinese people.”68 Google decided to establish the site Google.cn, but without features that allowed users to provide content. To avoid putting individuals in jeopardy of being arrested, Google offered neither e-mail nor the ability to create blogs, since user-generated material could be seized by the Chinese government. This allowed Google to avoid putting individuals in jeopardy of being arrested. Because Google would be required by Chinese law to censor search results associated with sensitive issues, it decided to place a brief notice at the bottom of a search page when material had been censored, as it did in other countries such as France and Germany which banned the sale of Nazi items. Google planned to exercise selfcensorship and developed a list of sensitive items by consulting with third parties and by studying the results of the Chinese government’s Internet filtering. Senior policy counsel Andrew McLaughlin stated, “Google is mindful that governments around the world impose restriction on access to information. In order to operate from China, we have removed some content from the search results available on Google.cn, in response to local law, regulation or policy. While removing search results is inconsistent with Google’s mission, providing no information (or a heavily degraded user experience that amounts to no information) is more inconsistent with our mission.”69 Google’s approach to entering China irritated the Chinese government. Within a month of offering Google.cn, Google was criticized by two government-run newspapers in China. The Beijing News criticized the company for not doing enough to block “harmful information.” Referring to Google’s practice of informing users when search results had been censored, the China Business Times wrote in an editorial, “Is it necessary for an enterprise that is operating within the borders of China to constantly tell your customers you are following domestic law?” Both publications claimed that Google was operating as an Internet content provider without a proper license.70 Reporters Without Borders, a Paris-based organization campaigning for freedom of expression, called the establishment of Google.cn “a black day for freedom of expression in China.” It stated: The firm defends the rights of U.S. Internet users before the U.S. government, but fails to defend its Chinese users against theirs. United States companies are now bending to the same censorship rules as their Chinese competitors, but they continue to justify themselves by saying their presence has a long-term benefit. Yet the Internet in China is becoming more and more isolated from the outside world.71 Other activists demanded that Google publish its censorship blacklist in the United States. Internet Censorship in China According to the U.S. State Department, companies offering Internet services were “pressured to sign the Chinese government’s ‘Public Pledge on Self-Discipline for the Chinese Internet Industry.’” Under the agreement, they promised not to disseminate information that “breaks laws or spreads 69New York Times, January 25, 2006. 70Washington Post, February 22, 2006. Google shared a license with a Chinese company, Ganji.com. This practice was common among foreign Internet firms. 71New York Times, January 25, 2006, op. cit. superstition or obscenity” or that “may jeopardize state security and disrupt social stability.”72 Providing Internet services required a license, which in turn required not circulating information that “damages the honor or interests of the state” or “disturbs the public order or destroys public stability …”73 Censorship in China involved self-regulation by Internet companies as well as government actions. The government did not provide a list of objectionable subjects—instead companies inferred which topics were out of bounds by observing what the government censors removed. The State Council Information Office also convened weekly meetings with Internet service providers. An American executive explained, “It’s known informally as the ‘wind-blowing meeting’—in other words, which way is the wind blowing. They say: ‘There’s this party conference going on this week. There are some foreign dignitaries here on this trip.’”74 Xin Ye, a founder of Sohu.com, a Chinese value-added Internet services firm, was asked how hard it was to navigate the censorship system. He said, “I’ll tell you this, it’s not more hard than dealing with Sarbanes and Oxley.”75 Zhao Jing, a political blogger in China, “explained that he knew where the government drew the line. ‘If you talk every day online and criticize the government, they don’t care. Because it’s just talk. But if you organize—even if it’s just three or four people—that’s what they crack down on. It’s not speech; it’s organizing.’”76 In December 2005 Zhao called for a boycott of a newspaper because it had fired an editor. In response, the Chinese government asked Microsoft’s MSN to close Zhao’s blog and Microsoft complied.77 Brooke Richardson of MSN said, “We only remove content if the order comes from the appropriate regulatory authority.”78 Yahoo! and MSN, as well as other sites, complied with Chinese law as well as exercising self-censorship.79 Robin Li, chairman of the Chinese search company Baidu.com, said, “We are trying to provide as much information as possible. But we need to obey Chinese law.”80 Baidu had reached an agreement that allowed the Chinese government to oversee its Web site and in exchange it avoided the disruptions of service and strict operating rules that plagued foreign Internet companies.81 In 2004 Yahoo! provided information to the Chinese government that led to the arrest of the journalist Shi Tao. Shi Speaking at an ethics conference on Internet search at Santa Clara University, Peter Norvig, director of research at Google, commented on the decision not to offer services such as e-mail and blogging in China. “We didn’t want to be in a position to hand over users’ information …. We thought that was just too dangerous …. We thought it was very important to keep our users out of jail.”94 Norvig justified Google’s policies in China. “Yes, it’s important to get information about democracy and Falun Gong. They also want to know about outbreaks of bird flu. We thought it was more important to give them this information that they can use even if we have to compromise.”95 Google continued to debate internally whether and how it should operate in China. It also hoped for guidance from the U.S. government and the industry. Norvig said, “We feel that the U.S. government can stand up and make stronger laws, and we feel that corporate America can get together and have stronger principles. We’re supporting efforts on both those fronts. We feel we can’t do it alone.”96 Norvig disclosed that Google was not keeping search logs in China. “They don’t have personally identifiable information but they do have IP addresses that are potentially identifiable with an individual.”97 That information was kept in the United States, and China could request that information through the U.S. State Department. Political Pressure in the United States In advance of congressional hearings on China and censorship, the State Department announced the creation of a Global Internet Task Force to decrease censorship and encourage change in other countries. Paula Dobriansky, undersecretary of state for democracy, human rights, and labor, said, “The Internet, especially, can be a liberating force. Topics once politically taboo can become freely discussed, and people can communicate anonymously. We must ensure it does not become a tool of repression.”98 Representative Chris Smith (R-NJ), chairman of the House Subcommittee on Africa, Global Human Rights, and International Operations, introduced the Global Internet Freedom Act that would impose restrictions on U.S. companies operating in China. It included a code of conduct, requiring that e-mail servers be located outside the country and licensing requirements for the export of technologies that could be used for censorship. Smith held a hearing in which Cisco Systems, Google, Microsoft, and Yahoo! testified and were grilled by subcommittee members. Commenting on China’s sophisticated censorship system, Smith said, “It’s an active
■ Preparation Questions
1. What principles are relevant for Google’s decision to enter China? Is censorship consistent with Google’s core values? Should compromises be made?
2. Why does the Chinese government censor information so aggressively?
3. Should Google have entered China?
4. Given that Google decided to enter China, should it have offered e-mail and hosted blogs? Should it have restricted its offerings more than it actually did?
5. Are Google’s practices sufficient? What else should it do?
6. Should Google lobby the Chinese government to change its censorship policies?
7. Should Google lobby the U.S. government to develop a policy to guide U.S. Internet companies in China?
Step by stepSolved in 9 steps
- Following your analysis of your company situation, you had the idea and the ambition to export your services to foreign markets. However, you are not sure how to proceed in order to make your export project a reality. You want the advice of experts in the field. Where could you find these advisers or, in other words, which institutions offer export support in Canada? course: Export of services write 6 lines onlyarrow_forwardPTC is a large trading conglomerate in India. In 2013, its Food division decided to enter the fast growing snacks segment, an altogether new market segment for the group. In this segment, it had only one national competitor – Trito. After 3 years, PTC’s new snack brand – Ringo, captured 20% market share across India. Fingo introduction coincided with the Cricket Word Cup which was hosted in India at the time of the launch. The snack market in India is estimated to be about $700 million. PTC could take advantage of its existing distribution network and easily source potatoes (used to make its snacks) from farmers with whom it already enjoyed strong supplier arrangements. Before PTC entered the market it established a cross-functional team to manage the project. The team commissioned a series of customer survey through a marketing research company in 14 major cities across the country to better understand the snack eating habits of consumers. The results showed that the customers within…arrow_forwardExplain the moral dilemma of doing business in China. Do companies have a moral requirement to opt out of the market, despite its size, if doing business in China requires companies to compromise their ideals?arrow_forward
- Discuss how foreign trade zones (FTZ) can improve on the advantages gained from worldwidesourcing. Find the FTZ closest to you. I live in Northbay ontarioarrow_forwardWhen Google initially started operating in China, the company ran across a number of problems.arrow_forwardThe Canadian government has provided export assistance to Bombardier Inc. with its Technology Transfer Program. Is this consistent with the principles of a free market system? Explain how this might distort the system. Please put the website linkarrow_forward
- As the director of international marketing for a company producing refrigirators, develop a screening criteria for Brazil and Germany and evaluate the two countries. Add any additional assumptions about the company that are necessary. Explain and give examples of stereotypes, ethnocentrism, degree of economic development, and fads as the basis for generalizations about a country and its effect on product perception.arrow_forward18. Choose one example of a Foreign Market Entry Mode and explain how you understand that particular mode of entry into a foreign market works.arrow_forwardWhat Entry Mode McDonalds used to enter the Chinese Market, what are the pros and cons of this entry mode?arrow_forward
- Cross-market subsidization refers to A) supporting competitive moves in one country market with resources and profits diverted from operations in other country markets. B) the practice of shifting company resources from nations where a company has big profit sanctuaries to nations where it has smaller profit sanctuaries. C) the practice of getting a company's home government to help finance or subsidize its entry into foreign countries. D) using cross-border transfer of a company's skills and expertise as a basis for successfully overcoming the barriers to entering new country markets. deliberatly operating at a loss in some country markets.arrow_forwardRight-Time is a direct sales company, sells health products directly to consumers without going through retail outlets, thereby creating its own supply chain. It markets and distributes over 100 consumer products, employs over 5,000 people worldwide, and works with Right-Time business owners (RTBO) in over 25 countries. The RTBOs is the link between products and consumers. Right-Time has a global strategy for producing, marketing, and distributing its products worldwide which relies on the RTBOs. One strategy supports sustainable, small global organic farms to grow plants for their smoothie blends. Another strategy is aligning products and advertising to diverse markets. Additionally, they support employee volunteerism and offer employees four paid days per year of leave to volunteer. Employees regularly volunteer in their local communities, which builds brand awareness and demonstrates social responsibility for Right-Time. Right-Time hosts an annual celebration for employees,…arrow_forwardForeign Market Commonalities Various factors or forces impact a company's decision to go into a foreign market and affect the outcome of that decision. If a country or market has several factors in common with the original market, or with the other markets selected when choosing several markets, it will be easier to enter that market. • If a U.S. software company that primarily creates and sells educational software on math, language, and even coding wants to expand into two foreign markets, what factor commonalities (as found in the learning activities) should the company be looking for when deciding on the two countries? • Provide two country suggestions and explain your reasoning.arrow_forward
- Understanding BusinessManagementISBN:9781259929434Author:William NickelsPublisher:McGraw-Hill EducationManagement (14th Edition)ManagementISBN:9780134527604Author:Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. CoulterPublisher:PEARSONSpreadsheet Modeling & Decision Analysis: A Pract...ManagementISBN:9781305947412Author:Cliff RagsdalePublisher:Cengage Learning
- Management Information Systems: Managing The Digi...ManagementISBN:9780135191798Author:Kenneth C. Laudon, Jane P. LaudonPublisher:PEARSONBusiness Essentials (12th Edition) (What's New in...ManagementISBN:9780134728391Author:Ronald J. Ebert, Ricky W. GriffinPublisher:PEARSONFundamentals of Management (10th Edition)ManagementISBN:9780134237473Author:Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. Coulter, David A. De CenzoPublisher:PEARSON