on't know the cause at this point, but we t looking. these two people might very well have red. In a total quality setting, that deci- sidered the last resort. Most employees job and will if they are provided with urces and training. In a case like this, that the fault lies with management. re not adequately trained for the job, or al factor (noise, temperature, lighting, or at fault, or the operators may simply not e task (because of vision impairment, im- or some other problem). In any of those ment is at fault and, therefore, should do ming to correct the problem. an be valuable tools for converting data into ase information. The key is teaching opera- them and empowering them to do so. O-2 Good or bad 11 B1 Pass or fail Accept or reject o-1 13 Al . Conforming or nonconforming A.1 0-2 4 Variables Data 28 C2 23 . Measured values (dimension, weight, voltage, surface, etc.) --- --- - ::::: 33 C3 36 Figure 15.14 would tell us what we wanted to know if we were interested only in the number of shafts accepted versus the number rejected. Looking at the shaft process in this way, we are using attributes data: either they passed or they failed the screening. This reveals only that we are scrap- ping between 3 and 4% of all the shafts made. It does not tell us anything about the process adjustment that may be contributing to the scrap rate. Nor does it tell us anything about how robust the process is-might some slight change push the process over the edge? For that kind of insight, we need variables data. One can gain much more information about a pro- cess when variables data are available. The check sheet of O.1 .1 3 +-1 40 82 Half-day totals 10 79 6 4 76 6 10 9 39 35 17 15 11 Full-day totals 12 19 74 LEGEND: Hand wrap . Solder point to point A= Harness Ribbon Other FIGURE 15.13 Check Sheet: Defect Factors-Miswires. HISTOGRAMS measured data. That example used shaft length measured in thousandths of an inch, but any scale of measurement can be Figure 15.12 shows that both of the rejects (out-of-limits used, as appropriate for the process under scrutiny. A pro- tise Not Required shafts) were on the low side of the specified tolerance. The although much of the following discussion control charts is related to statistics, many will not be expert statisticians, Unfortunately, ext does not allow for a treatise on statistics, oted to present the material and mathemati- way that can be followed by the uninitiated stay with us. In doing this, we have sacri- e accuracy of the information presented or plied. Our objective is that both the statistics ert will be rewarded with a good understand- their applications, and the methodology and math. For those interested in delving deeper tatistics, many books are dedicated to each Histograms are used to chart frequency of occurrence. How often does something happen? Any discussion of histograms must begin with an understanding of the two kinds of data cess used in making electrical resistors would use the scale peak of the histogram seems to occur between 1.123 and commonly associated with processes: attributes and variables a weight scale, and so on. Variables data are something that data. Although they were not introduced as such, both kinds of data have been used in the illustrations of this chapter. An attribute is something that the output product of the pro- cess either has or does not have. From one of the examples Go-No Go screen at the end of the process, accepting all (Figure 15.6), either an electronic assembly had wiring er- rors or it did not. Another example (see Figure 15.30) shows that either an assembly had broken screws or it did not. These are attributes. The example of making shafts of a spec- ified length (Figures 15.11 and 15.12) was concerned with 1.124 in. If the machine were adjusted to bring the peak up to 1.125 in., some of the low-end rejects might be elimi- nated without causing any new rejects at the top end. The frequency distribution also suggests that the process as it stands now will always have occasional rejects-probably in the 2 to 3% range at best. of electrical resistance in ohms, another process might use results from measurement. Using the shaft example again, an all-too-common sce- nario in manufacturing plants would have been to place a shafts between the specification limits of 1.120 and 1.130 in. and discarding the rest. Data might have been i keep track of the number of shafts that had to be scrapped. Such a record might have looked like Figure 15.14, based on the original data. to Shaft Acceptance: Week of 7/11 (Spec: 1.120-1.130) Date Accepted Rejected 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 11 12 11 12 12 Totals 58
on't know the cause at this point, but we t looking. these two people might very well have red. In a total quality setting, that deci- sidered the last resort. Most employees job and will if they are provided with urces and training. In a case like this, that the fault lies with management. re not adequately trained for the job, or al factor (noise, temperature, lighting, or at fault, or the operators may simply not e task (because of vision impairment, im- or some other problem). In any of those ment is at fault and, therefore, should do ming to correct the problem. an be valuable tools for converting data into ase information. The key is teaching opera- them and empowering them to do so. O-2 Good or bad 11 B1 Pass or fail Accept or reject o-1 13 Al . Conforming or nonconforming A.1 0-2 4 Variables Data 28 C2 23 . Measured values (dimension, weight, voltage, surface, etc.) --- --- - ::::: 33 C3 36 Figure 15.14 would tell us what we wanted to know if we were interested only in the number of shafts accepted versus the number rejected. Looking at the shaft process in this way, we are using attributes data: either they passed or they failed the screening. This reveals only that we are scrap- ping between 3 and 4% of all the shafts made. It does not tell us anything about the process adjustment that may be contributing to the scrap rate. Nor does it tell us anything about how robust the process is-might some slight change push the process over the edge? For that kind of insight, we need variables data. One can gain much more information about a pro- cess when variables data are available. The check sheet of O.1 .1 3 +-1 40 82 Half-day totals 10 79 6 4 76 6 10 9 39 35 17 15 11 Full-day totals 12 19 74 LEGEND: Hand wrap . Solder point to point A= Harness Ribbon Other FIGURE 15.13 Check Sheet: Defect Factors-Miswires. HISTOGRAMS measured data. That example used shaft length measured in thousandths of an inch, but any scale of measurement can be Figure 15.12 shows that both of the rejects (out-of-limits used, as appropriate for the process under scrutiny. A pro- tise Not Required shafts) were on the low side of the specified tolerance. The although much of the following discussion control charts is related to statistics, many will not be expert statisticians, Unfortunately, ext does not allow for a treatise on statistics, oted to present the material and mathemati- way that can be followed by the uninitiated stay with us. In doing this, we have sacri- e accuracy of the information presented or plied. Our objective is that both the statistics ert will be rewarded with a good understand- their applications, and the methodology and math. For those interested in delving deeper tatistics, many books are dedicated to each Histograms are used to chart frequency of occurrence. How often does something happen? Any discussion of histograms must begin with an understanding of the two kinds of data cess used in making electrical resistors would use the scale peak of the histogram seems to occur between 1.123 and commonly associated with processes: attributes and variables a weight scale, and so on. Variables data are something that data. Although they were not introduced as such, both kinds of data have been used in the illustrations of this chapter. An attribute is something that the output product of the pro- cess either has or does not have. From one of the examples Go-No Go screen at the end of the process, accepting all (Figure 15.6), either an electronic assembly had wiring er- rors or it did not. Another example (see Figure 15.30) shows that either an assembly had broken screws or it did not. These are attributes. The example of making shafts of a spec- ified length (Figures 15.11 and 15.12) was concerned with 1.124 in. If the machine were adjusted to bring the peak up to 1.125 in., some of the low-end rejects might be elimi- nated without causing any new rejects at the top end. The frequency distribution also suggests that the process as it stands now will always have occasional rejects-probably in the 2 to 3% range at best. of electrical resistance in ohms, another process might use results from measurement. Using the shaft example again, an all-too-common sce- nario in manufacturing plants would have been to place a shafts between the specification limits of 1.120 and 1.130 in. and discarding the rest. Data might have been i keep track of the number of shafts that had to be scrapped. Such a record might have looked like Figure 15.14, based on the original data. to Shaft Acceptance: Week of 7/11 (Spec: 1.120-1.130) Date Accepted Rejected 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 11 12 11 12 12 Totals 58