One of the I/O mechanisms missing from a hypothetical computer system is the interrupt. Is there any impact on the system's performance?

An operation is considered to have been successfully stopped when the central processing unit (CPU) accepts the interruption and proceeds on to the next job. If the process is already underway, then why is it impossible to halt it? Since the execution and cleaning can wait till we've resolved the problem, there's no reason not to take care of them right now.

When a CPU interrupt occurs, the processor comes to a halt and reacts to the signal. Why should the process be halted so that this duty may be completed? Let's start with the pausing procedure and then go on to the carrying out process. Explain?

Processes are stopped and the CPU takes care of the new one when an interrupt comes in from the CPU. What's the point of continuing with this procedure? The execution and cleaning have been completed, so why are we still stuck?

When a computer processor carries out more than one instruction at once, what are some ways that it might minimize the number of calculation cycles that are lost that it would otherwise waste? Describe what happened as a direct consequence of the actions that they took.

Imagine that you have been given the responsibility of illustrating the manner in which the Memory Module, the I/O Module, and the CPU Module are all coupled with one another as well as the rest of the computer. Do you think it is necessary for you to emphasise the relevance of this message in the appropriate manner?