Oldham, Incorporated conducts business in State M and State N, which both use the UDITPA three-factor formula to apportion income. State M's corporate tax rate is 4.5 percent, and State N's corporate tax rate is 7 percent. This year, Oldham had the following sales, payroll, and property (in thousands of dollars) in each state: Gross receipts from sales Payroll expense Property costs Total taxable income subject to apportionment Apportionment percentage State M $ 3,350 1,180 940 State taxable income Tax rate State tax State N $ 7,700 1,320 1,720 Required: Oldham's before-tax income was $3.10 million. Compute Oldham's State M and State N tax if State N uses an apportionment formula in which the sales factor is double-weighted. Note: Round all apportionment factors to 4 decimal places, e.g., 47.15% would be 0.4715. Enter "Apportionment percentage" and "Tax rate" in decimals and not in percentage. Do not round any intermediate values. Enter your answers in dollars and not in millions or thousands of dollars. Total $ 11,050 2,500 2,660 State M State N

Oldham, Incorporated conducts business in State M and State N, which both use the UDITPA three-factor formula to apportion income. State M's corporate tax rate is 4.5 percent, and State N's corporate tax rate is 7 percent. This year, Oldham had the following sales, payroll, and property (in thousands of dollars) in each state: Gross receipts from sales Payroll expense Property costs Total taxable income subject to apportionment Apportionment percentage State M $ 3,350 1,180 940 State taxable income Tax rate State tax State N $ 7,700 1,320 1,720 Required: Oldham's before-tax income was $3.10 million. Compute Oldham's State M and State N tax if State N uses an apportionment formula in which the sales factor is double-weighted. Note: Round all apportionment factors to 4 decimal places, e.g., 47.15% would be 0.4715. Enter "Apportionment percentage" and "Tax rate" in decimals and not in percentage. Do not round any intermediate values. Enter your answers in dollars and not in millions or thousands of dollars. Total $ 11,050 2,500 2,660 State M State N

FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING

10th Edition

ISBN:9781259964947

Author:Libby

Publisher:Libby

Chapter1: Financial Statements And Business Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1Q

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

What is risk of incorrect acceptance? A. The risk that the auditor concludes that a material misstatement exists when it does not exist. B. The risk that the auditor concludes that a material misstatement does not exist when it actually does not. C. The risk that the auditor concludes that a material misstatement does not exist when it does exist. D. The risk that the auditor concludes that a material misstatement exists when it actually does.
The engagement quality control reviewer (choose he INCORRECT one) Does not otherwise participate in the engagement during the period of review May be selected by the engagement partner Does not make decisions for the engagement team Is not subject to other considerations that would threaten the reviewer's objectivity
The phrase “except for the possible effects of the matter described…” appears in an audit report. This could be what type of opinion? a. Qualified Adverse Disclaimer Yes Yes No b. Qualified Adverse Disclaimer Yes No No c. Qualified Adverse Disclaimer No No Yes d. Qualified Adverse Disclaimer No Yes No e. Qualified Adverse Disclaimer Yes Yes Yes
What exactly are the effects of choosing the wrong indexing strategy?
Please describe a time when you were faced with a personal dilemma regarding whether to blow the whistle on a wrongdoing. Some examples of a wrongdoing are witnessing cheating on an exam, witnessing someone trying to steal, noticing someone trying to take advantage of another, and completing a project at work without recording time spent in order to meet time constraints. Who were the stakeholders in the situation and how were they impacted by the wrongdoing? How did rationalization encourage the wrongdoer to follow through with their wrongdoing? What did you do and why? Case scenario: for someone working but not clocking in How would this fit under this dilemma? Please explain:
Please describe a time when you were faced with a personal dilemma regarding whether to blow the whistle on a wrongdoing. Some examples of a wrongdoing are witnessing cheating on an exam, witnessing someone trying to steal, noticing someone trying to take advantage of another, and completing a project at work without recording time spent in order to meet time constraints. Who were the stakeholders in the situation and how were they impacted by the wrongdoing? How did rationalization encourage the wrongdoer to follow through with their wrongdoing? What did you do and why?
None
Some accountants argue that the receiving department should be eliminated. Discuss the objective of eliminating the receiving function. What accounting/audit problems need to be resolved.
How specifically do you contribute to or impact the financial health of your organization? Note:- Do not provide handwritten solution. Maintain accuracy and quality in your answer. Take care of plagiarism. Answer completely. You will get up vote for sure.
Professional skepticism is a. The application of relevant training, knowledge and experience b. Adherence to the professional code of ethics c. An attitude that includes a questioning mind d. Necessary for a quality control system Clear my choice
what exactly is a cookie jar reserve? Does using a cookie jar reserve follow GAAP? Does using a cookie jar reserve appear to be an ethical practice? Support your opinion. Your post should be more than a single sentence.
It says they answers are wrong from your example.