Nowhereton is a coastal town with a small population, mostly known for being home to the now almost extinct seven fingered Deliciosa Treefrog. Other than by sea, the only way of accessing the town is via a rough dirt road off a main expressway. Recently the local council has been considering making the town more accessible by improving the condition of the road. In the past two years, there have been several instances where critically ill or injured residents have had to be airlifted out of the town because driving out was not viable. Other likely benefits from having a better road include higher land values, greater potential for revenue from tourism related activities, and convenience for residents who may have to leave town for things such as supplies or routine medical treatment. However, one major drawback would be the increased likelihood of damage to the environment and native wildlife due to a larger tourist population and more movement throughout the area. The following financial information has been provided to the council in order to help with the decision. While the road itself would last many years, the council has decided to analyses the costs over a 5-year time horizon and apply its usual hurdle rate of 12% for capital expenditure projects. The tax rate is 30% (we're going to assume the council pays taxl). Cost of clearing land Cost of levelling the ground Cost of tarring the new road Cost of sealing the road Cost of lighting and signage Annual maintenance cost of road Annual revenue from road tolls 100,000 30,000 10,000 10,000 60,000 12,000 35,000 *Note: costs of developing the road are one-off in nature and will not be depreciated. The council calculated the net present value of the proposed road project as follows: Revenue from road tolls Less maintenance cost of road Pre-tax annual incremental benefits Tax @ 30% After-tax annual incremental benefits Present value of after-tax annual incremental benefits (@ 3.6048) Less Initial investment NPV of the project 35,000 12,000 33,000 9,900 23,100 83,270.88 210,000 -126,729.12 Required: 1. Should the council reject the road project based on the negative NPV? Discuss two (2) potential issues with the council using NPV to make a decision about this road into Nowhereton.
Nowhereton is a coastal town with a small population, mostly known for being home to the now almost extinct seven fingered Deliciosa Treefrog. Other than by sea, the only way of accessing the town is via a rough dirt road off a main expressway. Recently the local council has been considering making the town more accessible by improving the condition of the road. In the past two years, there have been several instances where critically ill or injured residents have had to be airlifted out of the town because driving out was not viable. Other likely benefits from having a better road include higher land values, greater potential for revenue from tourism related activities, and convenience for residents who may have to leave town for things such as supplies or routine medical treatment. However, one major drawback would be the increased likelihood of damage to the environment and native wildlife due to a larger tourist population and more movement throughout the area. The following financial information has been provided to the council in order to help with the decision. While the road itself would last many years, the council has decided to analyses the costs over a 5-year time horizon and apply its usual hurdle rate of 12% for capital expenditure projects. The tax rate is 30% (we're going to assume the council pays taxl). Cost of clearing land Cost of levelling the ground Cost of tarring the new road Cost of sealing the road Cost of lighting and signage Annual maintenance cost of road Annual revenue from road tolls 100,000 30,000 10,000 10,000 60,000 12,000 35,000 *Note: costs of developing the road are one-off in nature and will not be depreciated. The council calculated the net present value of the proposed road project as follows: Revenue from road tolls Less maintenance cost of road Pre-tax annual incremental benefits Tax @ 30% After-tax annual incremental benefits Present value of after-tax annual incremental benefits (@ 3.6048) Less Initial investment NPV of the project 35,000 12,000 33,000 9,900 23,100 83,270.88 210,000 -126,729.12 Required: 1. Should the council reject the road project based on the negative NPV? Discuss two (2) potential issues with the council using NPV to make a decision about this road into Nowhereton.
Essentials Of Investments
11th Edition
ISBN:9781260013924
Author:Bodie, Zvi, Kane, Alex, MARCUS, Alan J.
Publisher:Bodie, Zvi, Kane, Alex, MARCUS, Alan J.
Chapter1: Investments: Background And Issues
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1PS
Related questions
Question
Do not copy from anwhere.
Transcribed Image Text:Nowhereton is a coastal town with a small population, mostly known for being home to the now almost
extinct seven fingered Deliciosa Treefrog. Other than by sea, the only way of accessing the town is via a
rough dirt road off a main expressway. Recently the local council has been considering making the town
more accessible by improving the condition of the road. In the past two years, there have been several
instances where critically ill or injured residents have had to be airlifted out of the town because driving out
was not viable. Other likely benefits from having a better road include higher land values, greater potential
for revenue from tourism related activities, and convenience for residents who may have to leave town for
things such as supplies or routine medical treatment. However, one major drawback would be the
increased likelihood of damage to the environment and native wildlife due to a larger tourist population
and more movement throughout the area.
The following financial information has been provided to the council in order to help with the decision.
While the road itself would last many years, the council has decided to analyses the costs over a 5-year
time horizon and apply its usual hurdle rate of 12% for capital expenditure projects. The tax rate is 30%
(we're going to assume the council pays taxl).
Cost of clearing land
Cost of levelling the ground
Cost of tarring the new road
Cost of sealing the road
Cost of lighting and signage
Annual maintenance cost of road
Annual revenue from road tolls
100,000
30,000
10,000
10,000
60,000
12,000
35,000
*Note: costs of developing the road are one-off in nature and will not be depreciated.
The council calculated the net present value of the proposed road project as follows:
24
35,000
Revenue from road tolls
Less maintenance cost of road
Pre-tax annual incremental benefits
Tax @ 30%
After-tax annual incremental benefits
Present value of after-tax annual incremental benefits i
Less Initial investment
NPV of the project
12,000
33,000
9,900
23,100
83,270.88
210,000
-126,729.12
3.6048)
Required:
1. Should the council reject the road project based on the negative NPV? Discuss two (2) potential issues
with the council using NPV to make a decision about this road into Nowhereton.
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
Step by step
Solved in 3 steps
Recommended textbooks for you
Essentials Of Investments
Finance
ISBN:
9781260013924
Author:
Bodie, Zvi, Kane, Alex, MARCUS, Alan J.
Publisher:
Mcgraw-hill Education,
Essentials Of Investments
Finance
ISBN:
9781260013924
Author:
Bodie, Zvi, Kane, Alex, MARCUS, Alan J.
Publisher:
Mcgraw-hill Education,
Foundations Of Finance
Finance
ISBN:
9780134897264
Author:
KEOWN, Arthur J., Martin, John D., PETTY, J. William
Publisher:
Pearson,
Fundamentals of Financial Management (MindTap Cou…
Finance
ISBN:
9781337395250
Author:
Eugene F. Brigham, Joel F. Houston
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Corporate Finance (The Mcgraw-hill/Irwin Series i…
Finance
ISBN:
9780077861759
Author:
Stephen A. Ross Franco Modigliani Professor of Financial Economics Professor, Randolph W Westerfield Robert R. Dockson Deans Chair in Bus. Admin., Jeffrey Jaffe, Bradford D Jordan Professor
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education