Natalie believes her cell phone company has been charging her exccesive fees under her cell phone contract. She wishes to sue the cell phone company. However, her contract states she must submit any legal claims arising out of the contract to the arbitation. The arbitrator is a former employee of the cell phone company. The arbitrator sides with the cell phone company and awatds damges to the cell phone company in the amount of $60,000. Can Natalie change the decision of the arbitrator in court?

Delany and Eden enter into an agreement where Delany will purchase 50 pounds of assorted craft beads from Eden. Eden, however, breaches the contract and does not supply Delany with the contracted beads. This deals with which of the following types of laws? criminal law federal law public law equity private law

Alan’s real estate broker suggested that he use a quitclaim deed to sell his super cool Brentwood condo so that the buyer would: Be the grantor under the deed and have full recourse against the seller for any title related claims Acquire only the legal interest in the property that Alan previously held Know that all prior mortgages, liens, and other encumbrances had either been reconveyed or removed from the property’s title Receive assurance that the property was free from any title defects

a WI Thi aw poin loqua yd olM : Jane was tired of living in the jungle with Tarzan and entered into a sales contract to purchase a small house from Tarzan that he had inherited. Tarzan later changed his mind, because he liked Jane swinging in the trees with him. If Jane decides to seek legal assistance to acquire the house, which remedy should she ask for? O Quantum meruit O Promissory estoppel O Specific performance O Legal ejectment dead art

Eric and Susan just purchased their first home, which cost $140,000. They purchased a homeowner’s policy to insure the home for $130,000 and personal property for $80,000. They declined any coverage for additional living expenses. The deductible for the policy is $500. Soon after Eric and Susan moved into their new home, a strong windstorm caused damage to their roof. They reported the roof damage to be $19,500. While the roof was under repair, the couple had to live in a nearby hotel for three days. The hotel bill amounted to $420. Assuming the insurance company settles claims using the replacement value method, what amount will the insurance company pay for the damages to the roof?

Shawn buys 50 widgets at a store closing sale. He buys the widgets intending to use them around the house. He only uses 25, though, and decides to sell the remaining widgets online. Shawn lives in Colorado. He finds an individual buyer, Victoria, in Italy. Does the CISG apply if there is an issue with this contract? O No, because at least one party must be a merchant. Yes, because the contract does not state that the CISG does not apply. O Yes, because the CISG automatically applies when two signatory country parties enter into a contract. No, because the contract does not state that the CISG applies. O No, because these are two consumers.

The standard of reivew used by the Connecticut Supreme Court in determining whether the takings were constitutional under the 5th Amendment was:     a. The takings were reasonably necessary to achieve the City of New London's intended public use.   b. The takings were substantially necessary to achieve the City of New London's intended public use.   c. There was clear and convincing evidence that the economic benefits of City of New London's plan would in fact come to pass.   d. The evidence was beyond a reasonable doubt that the economic benefits of the City of New London's plan would in fact come to pass.

Xavier and Adam enter into a written contract for the sale of DJ equipment.  Their contract states that risk of loss shall pass to the buyer at the time the contract is signed.  Since this is contrary to Article 2 of the UCC, this clause is unenforceable.  True  False

Assume an agent is given authority by the principal to sell a property. The principal only states that the agent may sell the property and the agent is given no further instructions. The agent reasonably believes that it will be necessary to perform $10,000 worth of improvements on the property in order to sell it. Therefore, the agent contracts to have these improvements made. He/she then sells the property. The principal believes that the improvements were not authorized and refuses to reimburse the agent for the expenses associated with the sale. Discuss the rights and liabilities of the principal and agent. Should the principal be forced to reimburse the agent? If the principal continues to refuse to reimburse the agent, what action may be taken by the agent? If the parties were to engage in a lawsuit, who would win? Why? If the answer depends on information not provided in the scenario, specify what further information one would need to render a firm opinion.

Amanda and Emilia are co-directors and members of Griffin Pty Ltd, which imports widgets from Vietnam and sells them in various hardware stores in regional NSW. Griffin has a medium-sized warehouse where it stocks goods, and from which it distributes products.   Griffin recently signed a contract to supply a large hardware store in Orange and Dubbo with widgets. So the company ordered 10 pallets of widgets from its Vietnamese supplier and also paid a substantial deposit. A shipping company who carries goods into Australia has already brought the pallets into the country and has sent their bill to Griffin.   After a couple of deliveries to the hardware store, a safety issue is discovered with the widgets and the government bans the sale of the widgets. the hardware store cancels all further orders of the widgets.   Now, Griffin has no future revenue and its remaining stock of widgets cannot be sold. The shipping company is demanding payment of its invoice; there are also several…