n 1974, Loftus and Palmer conducted a classic study demonstrating how the language used to ask a question can influence eyewitness memoryIn the study, college students watched a film of an automobile accident and then they were asked questions about what they saw. One group was asked “About how fast were the cars going when they smashed into each other?" Another group was asked the same question except the verb was changed to "hitinstead of smashed into". The "smashed into" group reported significantly higher estimates of speed than the "hit" group. Suppose a researcher repeats the study with a sample of today's college students and obtains the following results:
Smashed into n = 15; M = 40.8; SS = 510
Hit n = 15; M = 34.0; SS = 414
Do the results indicate a significantly higher estimated speed for the "smashed into" group? What is the effect size?
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Step by stepSolved in 2 steps
- Dr. Moas is interested in examining how environmental cues affect memory. She asks 15 students to study 10 obscure words for a vocabulary exam. All students take the final vocabulary exam in Classroom A. She randomly assigns participants to one of three locations to study for the exam: the same classroom (Classroom A), a different classroom (Classroom B), or a completely separate location, the school gym. Then, she records the number of vocabulary words that each student correctly defines on the exam. The data is as follows: Participant Study Location Vocabulary Words Answered Correctly 1 Same Classroom 9 2 Same Classroom 8 3 Same Classroom 10 4 Same Classroom 8 5 Same Classroom 9 6 Different Classroom 9 7 Different Classroom 8 8 Different Classroom 7 9 Different Classroom 8 10 Different Classroom 7 11 School Gym 6 12 School Gym 7 13 School Gym 5 14 School Gym 6…arrow_forwardDr. Moas is interested in examining how environmental cues affect memory. She asks 15 students to study 10 obscure words for a vocabulary exam. All students take the final vocabulary exam in Classroom A. She randomly assigns participants to one of three locations to study for the exam: the same classroom (Classroom A), a different classroom (Classroom B), or a completely separate location, the school gym. Then, she records the number of vocabulary words that each student correctly defines on the exam. The data is as follows: Participant Study Location Vocabulary Words Answered Correctly 1 Same Classroom 9 2 Same Classroom 8 3 Same Classroom 10 4 Same Classroom 8 5 Same Classroom 9 6 Different Classroom 9 7 Different Classroom 8 8 Different Classroom 7 9 Different Classroom 8 10 Different Classroom 7 11 School Gym 6 12 School Gym 7 13 School Gym 5 14 School Gym 6…arrow_forwardIn 1974, Loftus and Palmer conducted a classic study demonstrating how the language used to ask a question can influence eyewitness memory. In the study, college students watched a film of an automobile accident and then were asked questions about what they saw. One group was asked, “About how fast were the cars going when they smashed into each other?” Another group was asked the same question except the verb was changed to “hit” instead of “smashed into.” The “smashed into” group reported significantly higher estimates of speed than the “hit” group. Suppose a researcher repeats this study with a sample of today’s college students and obtains the following results: Estimated Speed Smashed into Hit n=15M=40.8SS=510 n=15M=34.9SS=414 Use an independent-measures t test with α=.05 to determine whether there is a significant difference between the two conditions and compute r2 to measure effect size. Now, increase the variability by doubling the two SS values to…arrow_forward
- Help!!arrow_forwardA high school track coach wanted to test whether giving the students an energy drink could affect performance during the 100 meter race. The coach split the 26 boys into two equal sized groups, where Group 1 was given the energy drink and Group 2 was not. The 100 meter race times were recorded during practice and shown in the table below. What inference can be made about the results? Group 1 Group 2 12.2 13 12.5 12.3 13.3 12.8 12.9 13 13 13.8 12.1 13 13 13 13 13 12.1 13 13 13 12.1 13 12.8 13 13 12.6 Mean: 12.7 Mean: 13 Since the simulation shows ( many cases or free cases )? where a mean difference of ( solve for this answer ) or less occurred when the groups were re-randomized, it can be inferred that the mean difference observed in the study was ( very possibly or very unlikely ) ?due to the random assignment of participants into groups, so the results of the study are (…arrow_forwardMr Alsup asked the studentS in his third-and sixth-period English classes whether they had chosen a topic for thier writing assignment. he recorded the data in a two-way table, as shown below English class Yes No Total Third period 24 6 30 Sixth period 22 3 25 Total 46 9 55 if jannette in in mr alsup sixth-period english class what is the probablity that she has not chosen a topic for her writing assignment? a- 3% b- 5% c- 12% d-14%arrow_forward
- Please help with these three parts. ? Thank you!arrow_forwardA survey was done where one question asked of the participants was, “How many meals per week do you typically eat at a restaurant”. The numerical answers ranged from a low of 0 to a high of 12. How could you ask a question that would treat this as a categorical variable? Give the question and give the choices for the answer.arrow_forwardCraik & Tulving ran an experiment to determine how depth of processing during study affects memory. In the study phase, 12 participants made judgments about words. In one block of trials (the visual condition) they indicated whether the words were written in upper case or lower case; in another block of trials (the auditory condition) they indicated whether the words contained an "ee" sound; in another block of trials (the meaning condition) they indicated whether the meaning of the words was pleasant or unpleasant. There were 12 words in each block. After completing the study phase, participants were asked to write down all the words they could remember. Here are the data: Mean Visual 3.5 Auditory 4.5 Meaning 6.0 Standard Deviation 1.5 1.6 1.9 Compared to the within-subjects design, the between-subjects design (select all that apply) Oa. Would have less statistical power O b. Would be less prone to experimenter bias O c. Would be less prone to order effects Od. Would have better…arrow_forward
- MATLAB: An Introduction with ApplicationsStatisticsISBN:9781119256830Author:Amos GilatPublisher:John Wiley & Sons IncProbability and Statistics for Engineering and th...StatisticsISBN:9781305251809Author:Jay L. DevorePublisher:Cengage LearningStatistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C...StatisticsISBN:9781305504912Author:Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. WallnauPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E...StatisticsISBN:9780134683416Author:Ron Larson, Betsy FarberPublisher:PEARSONThe Basic Practice of StatisticsStatisticsISBN:9781319042578Author:David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. FlignerPublisher:W. H. FreemanIntroduction to the Practice of StatisticsStatisticsISBN:9781319013387Author:David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. CraigPublisher:W. H. Freeman