Most economists believe the scarcity of resources will persist. Why?

A fast-food company spends millions of dollars to develop and promote a new hamburger on its menu only to find that consumers won't buy it because they don't like the taste.  From an economic perspective, the company should       keep the hamburger on the menu because they've spent so much money and time developing and promoting the product.        spend more money to develop a more efficient way to cook the hamburger so it cooks in a shorter time.        pull the hamburger off the menu and treat the development and promotion expenditures as a sunk cost.        keep trying to sell the hamburger so that people who developed and promote it have a job with the company.

Scarcity and choice are important in economics because there would be no economy if there was no scarcity (limitation in resources) and no choice as to how these resources would be used. Scarcity and choice are the founding blocks of the story of economics. Scarcity in economics refers to limited resources against unlimited wants. Choice is the alternative between them. Economics deals with the study of human behavior and how humans allocate their limited resources (scarcity) with their unlimited wants. Since we have limited resources, we usually have to choose one option (choice) and forgo the other. This phenomenon is called "opportunity cost" . Our wants change when we consume more of one particular option, Its value diminishes and we start preferring some other option. This is called 'utility' or 'diminishing utility' as a progressive term. Example: If you are in school and you only have $10 for lunch money (scarcity), you can either buy a…

According to Forbes Magazine, there are close to 2700 billionaries in the world. It is likely fair to say that they don't face scarcity in quite the same way as you do or I do. Do they face scarcity at all? Why or why not?