Most current computer systems use fewer OSI model tiers. Computing systems' nature causes this. Drop some layers? Do fewer organisational levels have any drawbacks?

When is it beneficial to break down large computer programs and operations into smaller subsystems? In what ways is rational segmentation beneficial?

Yet, in contrast to the vast majority of actual computer systems, the OSI model assumes a higher number of levels. The reason for this is inherent in the nature of computing systems. Avoid utilizing as many layers as you can if at all feasible. If we cut down on the overall number of layers, what are some of the possible problems we could encounter?

When dealing with a huge computer, it is to your interest to partition tasks and programmes into more manageable subsystems of decreasing size. What are the benefits of breaking this system down into its component elements, logically speaking?

Is there an explanation of how "slicing and dicing" works in a multidimensional model?

We advocate for adding a tier to Flynn's taxonomy. So, what makes one computer more advanced than another?

When subsystems of large computer processes and programs are divided into smaller units, do they make sense? What are the benefits of this way of system segmentation?