Morris Saldov conducted a study in Eastern and Central Newfoundland in 1988 to examine public attitudes towards social spending. In particular, the study tried to determine if knowing someone on public assistance (yes, no) affected one's views on social spending (too little, about right, too much). The data from the study is summarized in the table below. Too Little About Right Too Much Total Yes No Total 39 4 43 18 11 29 7 5 12 64 20 84 Conduct a chi-square test for independence to determine if the association between knowing someone on public assistance and views on social spending is statistically significant. Choose the correct null and alternative hypotheses: O Ho: There is an association between knowing someone on public assistance and views on social spending. H. There is no association between knowing someone on public assistance and views on social spending. Ho: There is no association between knowing someone on public assistance and views on social spending. H. There is an association between knowing someone on public assistance and views on social spending. Complete the following table of expected counts. Round your answers to three decimal places, if Decem Part 2 of 5

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
icon
Related questions
Question
**Study Overview:**

Morris Saldov conducted a study in Eastern and Central Newfoundland in 1988 to examine public attitudes towards social spending. The study aimed to determine if knowing someone on public assistance affects one's views on social spending (categorized as too little, about right, and too much). The summarized data from the study is presented below:

|               | Yes | No | Total |
|---------------|-----|----|-------|
| Too Little    | 39  | 4  | 43    |
| About Right   | 18  | 11 | 29    |
| Too Much      | 7   | 5  | 12    |
| **Total**     | 64  | 20 | 84    |

**Statistical Analysis:**

A chi-square test for independence was conducted to determine if the association between knowing someone on public assistance and views on social spending is statistically significant.

**Null and Alternative Hypotheses:**

- \( H_0 \): There is no association between knowing someone on public assistance and views on social spending.
- \( H_1 \): There is an association between knowing someone on public assistance and views on social spending.

The correct hypothesis selected for this test is:

- \( H_0 \): There is no association between knowing someone on public assistance and views on social spending.
- \( H_1 \): There is an association between knowing someone on public assistance and views on social spending.

**Expected Counts Table:**

Complete the table of expected counts below. Round answers to three decimal places if necessary.

|               | Yes | No |
|---------------|-----|----|
| Too Little    |     |    |
| About Right   |     |    |
| Too Much      |     |    |

(Note: The expected counts need to be calculated based on the total counts and proportions provided in the study summary.)
Transcribed Image Text:**Study Overview:** Morris Saldov conducted a study in Eastern and Central Newfoundland in 1988 to examine public attitudes towards social spending. The study aimed to determine if knowing someone on public assistance affects one's views on social spending (categorized as too little, about right, and too much). The summarized data from the study is presented below: | | Yes | No | Total | |---------------|-----|----|-------| | Too Little | 39 | 4 | 43 | | About Right | 18 | 11 | 29 | | Too Much | 7 | 5 | 12 | | **Total** | 64 | 20 | 84 | **Statistical Analysis:** A chi-square test for independence was conducted to determine if the association between knowing someone on public assistance and views on social spending is statistically significant. **Null and Alternative Hypotheses:** - \( H_0 \): There is no association between knowing someone on public assistance and views on social spending. - \( H_1 \): There is an association between knowing someone on public assistance and views on social spending. The correct hypothesis selected for this test is: - \( H_0 \): There is no association between knowing someone on public assistance and views on social spending. - \( H_1 \): There is an association between knowing someone on public assistance and views on social spending. **Expected Counts Table:** Complete the table of expected counts below. Round answers to three decimal places if necessary. | | Yes | No | |---------------|-----|----| | Too Little | | | | About Right | | | | Too Much | | | (Note: The expected counts need to be calculated based on the total counts and proportions provided in the study summary.)
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps with 1 images

Blurred answer
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman