McDonald's coffee was unreasonably dangerous and therefore, McDonald's was strictly liable to the plaintiff; b. The coffee was "manufactured defectively due to excessive heat;" c. "The container itself had no warnings, or had a lack of warnings, rendering the product defectively marketed." Answer the following questions: (1) Strict Liability: Was the case an appropriate one for strict liability, based either on an unreasonably dangerous product or inadequate warnings? Look over the requirements for strict liability, and apply the facts as known about this case to the requirements for strict liability in these circumstances.

McDonald's coffee was unreasonably dangerous and therefore, McDonald's was strictly liable to the plaintiff; b. The coffee was "manufactured defectively due to excessive heat;" c. "The container itself had no warnings, or had a lack of warnings, rendering the product defectively marketed." Answer the following questions: (1) Strict Liability: Was the case an appropriate one for strict liability, based either on an unreasonably dangerous product or inadequate warnings? Look over the requirements for strict liability, and apply the facts as known about this case to the requirements for strict liability in these circumstances.