Many economists would consider an efficient level of pollution control to occur where the marginal benefit of reducing pollution is ____________ the marginal cost of reducing pollution.   Question 6 options:   greater than   equal to   less than

Price per gallon Quantity demanded (gallons) Quantity supplied (gallons) 1 700 300 2 600 400 3 500 500 4 400 600 5 300 700 6 200 800 7 100 900 8 0 1000     The market equilibrium quantity in the market for automobile antifreeze is ______ . If the external costs per gallon of antifreeze is $2, the socially optimal quantity of antifreeze is _________ .

Describe the key symmetry between a pollution emissions tax and an emissions trading scheme. Outline some reasons you might wish to choose one approach in favour of the other when dealing with an emissions-reduction problem.

Only typed answer  You are an industry analyst that specializes in an industry where the market inverse demand is P = 100 - 3Q. The external marginal cost of producing the product is MCExternal = 6Q, and the internal cost is MCInternal = 14Q.   Instruction: Round your answers to the nearest two decimal places.   a. What is the socially efficient level of output?   units     b. Given these costs and market demand, how much output would a competitive industry produce?   units     c. Given these costs and market demand, how much output would a monopolist produce?   units     d. Which of the following are actions the government could take to induce firms in this industry to produce the socially efficient level of output.   Instructions: You may select more than one answer. Click the box with a check mark for the correct answers and click twice to empty the box for the wrong answers. You must click to select or deselect each option in order to receive full credit. Pollution taxes…

Consider a firm that emits pollution into the air. Suppose that the marginal damage costs associated with the emissions are given by MDC -15+ 4 c, where e is the quantity of the emissions. The firm's marginal costs of abatement are given by (a) (b) 390 (c) MAC 1200 - 20 c. Determine the quantity of emissions that the firm would discharge in the absence of government policy. Determine the socially efficient level of emissions. Calculate the total costs to society for both a and b and draw a diagram illustrating these costs.

$ 15 7 0 Marginal Control Costs A 50 0 150 Marginal Damages 250 Emissions (tons) | What is the benefit to society from reducing emissions from 250 tons to 150 tons?

According to the graph below, which amount represents the most efficient level of pollution that needs to be controlled? Marginal Cost (dollars per unit) SO A-O B-O B-A Marginal Control Cost None of the above Total Total Damage Control Cost Cost Marginal Damage Cost B Quantity of Pollution Emitted (units)

Suppose the marginal cost (MC) and marginal benefit (MB) of reducing nitrogen oxide air pollution are illustrated in the figure. Suppose initially 3 million tons of nitrogen oxides are being reduced. What is the net benefit to society of increasing the elimination of nitrogen oxide air pollution to 6 million tons? The net benefit is $ million. (Enter your response rounded to one decimal place.) Cost or benefit ($ per ton) 500- 450 400- 350- 300- 250- 200- 150- 100- 50- 0- 0 1 MC 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Reduction (millions of tons per year) MB 9 10

No hand written solution Afirm has an industrial plant that emits pollutants into a town’s lake. The plant’s marginal abatement function is MAC= 200 – 0.5E and damages caused by its emissions are given by MD = 2E where emissions are in kg. per day. What is the socially efficient level of emissions from this plant? Illustrate this in a graph.   As an incentive to reduce emissions to the socially efficient level, government offers to pay the firm for each kg. of emissions it abates per day from this plant.   What subsidy per kg. should the government offer? If the plant abates to the socially efficient level of emissions, what total subsidy payment would the firm receive? Identify the area in your graph. How much better or worse off would the firm be compared to if it did no abating? Identify the area in your graph. What would be the net benefit to society if we pay the firm to reduce the plant’s emissions to the socially efficient level? Identify this area in your graph.

PRICE (Dollars per ton) 70 63 56 49 42 35 28 + 21 T 14 7 0 Demand +++ 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 360 400 QUANTITY (Millions of tons) Graph Input Tool Daily Demand for Pollution Rights Price (Dollars per ton) Quantity Demanded (Millions of tons) 7 360 Suppose the government has determined that the socially optimal quantity of particulate matter is 120 million tons per day. One way governments can charge firms for pollution rights is by imposing a per-unit tax on emissions. A tax (or price in this case) of $ of particulate matter emitted will achieve the desired level of pollution. ? per ton Now suppose the U.S. government does not know the demand curve for pollution and, therefore, cannot determine the optimal tax to achieve the desired level of pollution. Instead, it auctions off tradable pollution permits. Each permit entitles its owner to emit one ton of particulate matter per day. To achieve the socially optimal quantity of pollution, the government auctions off 120 million…