Looking at the tables for crosstabulation for Respondents Race, Highest Degree, and Respondents sex. How do we find out which one of these is the independent, dependent and or dummy variable? Also, how would you come up with an example for

Holt Mcdougal Larson Pre-algebra: Student Edition 2012
1st Edition
ISBN:9780547587776
Author:HOLT MCDOUGAL
Publisher:HOLT MCDOUGAL
ChapterCSR: Contents Of Student Resources
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 11.1EP
icon
Related questions
Question

Looking at the tables for crosstabulation for Respondents Race, Highest Degree, and Respondents sex. How do we find out which one of these is the independent, dependent and or dummy variable? Also, how would you come up with an example for a Hypothesis for this?

 

This is all one doccument. Table was too large. The first image is the top of the crosstab.

RESPONDENTS SEX *RS HIGHEST DEGREE * RACE OF RESPONDENT Crosstabulation
RACE OF RESPONDENT
RS HIGHEST DEGREE
JUNIOR
COLLEGE
LT HIGH
SCHOOL
HIGH SCHOOL
BACHELOR
GRADUATE
Total
WHITE
RESPONDENTS SEX
MALE
Count
92
327
43
146
81
689
% within RESPONDENTS SEX
13.4%
47.5%
6.2%
21.2%
11.8%
100.0%
FEMALE
Count
103
431
59
173
95
861
% within RESPONDENTS SEX
12.0%
50.1%
6.9%
20.1%
11.0%
100.0%
Total
Count
195
758
102
319
176
1550
% within RESPONDENTS SEX
12.6%
48.9%
6.6%
20.6%
11.4%
100.0%
BLACK
RESPONDENTS SEX
MALE
Count
32
60
13
118
% within RESPONDENTS SEX
27.1%
50.8%
4.2%
11.0%
6.8%
100.0%
FEMALE
Count
31
102
28
20
12
193
Transcribed Image Text:RESPONDENTS SEX *RS HIGHEST DEGREE * RACE OF RESPONDENT Crosstabulation RACE OF RESPONDENT RS HIGHEST DEGREE JUNIOR COLLEGE LT HIGH SCHOOL HIGH SCHOOL BACHELOR GRADUATE Total WHITE RESPONDENTS SEX MALE Count 92 327 43 146 81 689 % within RESPONDENTS SEX 13.4% 47.5% 6.2% 21.2% 11.8% 100.0% FEMALE Count 103 431 59 173 95 861 % within RESPONDENTS SEX 12.0% 50.1% 6.9% 20.1% 11.0% 100.0% Total Count 195 758 102 319 176 1550 % within RESPONDENTS SEX 12.6% 48.9% 6.6% 20.6% 11.4% 100.0% BLACK RESPONDENTS SEX MALE Count 32 60 13 118 % within RESPONDENTS SEX 27.1% 50.8% 4.2% 11.0% 6.8% 100.0% FEMALE Count 31 102 28 20 12 193
% within RESPONDENTS SEX
16.1%
52.8%
14.5%
10.4%
6.2%
100.0%
Total
Count
63
162
33
33
20
311
% within RESPONDENTS SEX
20.3%
52.1%
10.6%
10.6%
6.4%
100.0%
OTHER
RESPONDENTS SEX
MALE
Count
19
40
3
11
11
84
within RESPONDENTS SEX
22.6%
47.6%
3.6%
13.1%
13.1%
100.0%
FEMALE
Count
28
41
7
12
11
99
% within RESPONDENTS SEX
28.3%
41.4%
7.1%
12.1%
11.1%
100.0%
Total
Count
47
81
10
23
22
183
% within RESPONDENTS SEX
25.7%
44.3%
5.5%
12.6%
12.0%
100.0%
Total
RESPONDENTS SEX
MALE
Count
143
427
51
170
100
891
% within RESPONDENTS SEX
16.0%
47.9%
5.7%
19.1%
11.2%
100.0%
FEMALE
Count
162
574
94
205
118
1153
% within RESPONDENTS SEX
14.1%
49.8%
8.2%
17.8%
10.2%
100.0%
Total
Count
305
1001
145
375
218
2044
% within RESPONDENTS SEX
14.9%
49.0%
7.1%
18.3%
10.7%
100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2-
sided)
RACE OF RESPONDENT
Value
df
WHITE
Pearson Chi-Square
1.733
4
0.785
Likelihood Ratio
1.732
4
0.785
Linear-by-Linear Association
0.137
1
0.711
N of Valid Cases
1550
BLACK
Pearson Chi-Square
11.821°
4
0.019
Likelihood Ratio
12.741
4
0.013
Linear-by-Linear Association
2.016
1
0.156
N of Valid Cases
311
OTHER
Pearson Chi-Square
2.164
0.706
Likelihood Ratio
2.205
4
0.698
Linear-by-Linear Association
0.265
0.607
N of Valid Cases
183
Total
Pearson Chi-Square
6.804
4
0.147
Likelihood Ratio
6.879
4
0.142
Linear-by-Linear Association
0.042
1
0.837
N of Valid Cases
2044
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 63.21.
b. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 45.34.
c. O cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 7.59.
d. 1 cells (10.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4.59.
Symmetric Measures
Asymptotic
Standard Errora
Approximate
Significance
RACE OF RESPONDENT
Value
Approximate T
WHITE
Nominal by Nominal
Phi
0.033
0.785
Cramer's V
0.033
0.785
Ordinal by Ordinal
Gamma
Zero-Order
-0.008
0.040
-0.196
0.845
N of Valid Cases
1550
BLACK
Nominal by Nominal
Phi
0.195
0.019
Cramer's V
0.195
0.019
Ordinal by Ordinal
Gamma
Zero-Order
0.200
0.094
2.118
0.034
N of Valid Cases
311
OTHER
Nominal by Nominal
Phi
0.109
0.706
Cramer's V
0.109
0.706
Ordinal by Ordinal
Gamma
Zero-Order
-0.067
0.114
-0.585
0.559
N of Valid Cases
183
Total
Nominal by Nominal
Phi
0.058
0.147
Cramer's V
0.058
0.147
Ordinal by Ordinal
Gamma
Zero-Order
0.007
0.035
0.201
0.841
First-Order Partial
-0.001
N of Valid Cases
2044
a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
Transcribed Image Text:% within RESPONDENTS SEX 16.1% 52.8% 14.5% 10.4% 6.2% 100.0% Total Count 63 162 33 33 20 311 % within RESPONDENTS SEX 20.3% 52.1% 10.6% 10.6% 6.4% 100.0% OTHER RESPONDENTS SEX MALE Count 19 40 3 11 11 84 within RESPONDENTS SEX 22.6% 47.6% 3.6% 13.1% 13.1% 100.0% FEMALE Count 28 41 7 12 11 99 % within RESPONDENTS SEX 28.3% 41.4% 7.1% 12.1% 11.1% 100.0% Total Count 47 81 10 23 22 183 % within RESPONDENTS SEX 25.7% 44.3% 5.5% 12.6% 12.0% 100.0% Total RESPONDENTS SEX MALE Count 143 427 51 170 100 891 % within RESPONDENTS SEX 16.0% 47.9% 5.7% 19.1% 11.2% 100.0% FEMALE Count 162 574 94 205 118 1153 % within RESPONDENTS SEX 14.1% 49.8% 8.2% 17.8% 10.2% 100.0% Total Count 305 1001 145 375 218 2044 % within RESPONDENTS SEX 14.9% 49.0% 7.1% 18.3% 10.7% 100.0% Chi-Square Tests Asymptotic Significance (2- sided) RACE OF RESPONDENT Value df WHITE Pearson Chi-Square 1.733 4 0.785 Likelihood Ratio 1.732 4 0.785 Linear-by-Linear Association 0.137 1 0.711 N of Valid Cases 1550 BLACK Pearson Chi-Square 11.821° 4 0.019 Likelihood Ratio 12.741 4 0.013 Linear-by-Linear Association 2.016 1 0.156 N of Valid Cases 311 OTHER Pearson Chi-Square 2.164 0.706 Likelihood Ratio 2.205 4 0.698 Linear-by-Linear Association 0.265 0.607 N of Valid Cases 183 Total Pearson Chi-Square 6.804 4 0.147 Likelihood Ratio 6.879 4 0.142 Linear-by-Linear Association 0.042 1 0.837 N of Valid Cases 2044 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 63.21. b. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 45.34. c. O cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 7.59. d. 1 cells (10.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4.59. Symmetric Measures Asymptotic Standard Errora Approximate Significance RACE OF RESPONDENT Value Approximate T WHITE Nominal by Nominal Phi 0.033 0.785 Cramer's V 0.033 0.785 Ordinal by Ordinal Gamma Zero-Order -0.008 0.040 -0.196 0.845 N of Valid Cases 1550 BLACK Nominal by Nominal Phi 0.195 0.019 Cramer's V 0.195 0.019 Ordinal by Ordinal Gamma Zero-Order 0.200 0.094 2.118 0.034 N of Valid Cases 311 OTHER Nominal by Nominal Phi 0.109 0.706 Cramer's V 0.109 0.706 Ordinal by Ordinal Gamma Zero-Order -0.067 0.114 -0.585 0.559 N of Valid Cases 183 Total Nominal by Nominal Phi 0.058 0.147 Cramer's V 0.058 0.147 Ordinal by Ordinal Gamma Zero-Order 0.007 0.035 0.201 0.841 First-Order Partial -0.001 N of Valid Cases 2044 a. Not assuming the null hypothesis. b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer
Recommended textbooks for you
Holt Mcdougal Larson Pre-algebra: Student Edition…
Holt Mcdougal Larson Pre-algebra: Student Edition…
Algebra
ISBN:
9780547587776
Author:
HOLT MCDOUGAL
Publisher:
HOLT MCDOUGAL
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897…
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897…
Algebra
ISBN:
9780079039897
Author:
Carter
Publisher:
McGraw Hill
College Algebra (MindTap Course List)
College Algebra (MindTap Course List)
Algebra
ISBN:
9781305652231
Author:
R. David Gustafson, Jeff Hughes
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
College Algebra
College Algebra
Algebra
ISBN:
9781938168383
Author:
Jay Abramson
Publisher:
OpenStax