Listed below are amounts of court income and salaries paid to the town justices. All amounts are in thousands of dollars. Construct a scatterplot, find the value of the linear correlation coefficient r, and find the P-value using a = 0.05. Is there sufficient evidence to conclude that there is a linear correlation between court incomes and justice salaries? Based on the results, does it appear that justices might profit by levying larger fines? Court Income Justice Salary | 66.0 406.0 1567.0|1131.0 272.0 253.0 111.0 152.0 33.0 P 91 55 47 60 30 45 26 27 17

Thanks!

Please explain each step clearly, and no excel formula should be used for solving this problem

Listed below are amounts of court income and salaries paid to the town justices. All amounts are in thousands of dollars. Construct a scatterplot, find the value of the linear correlation coefficient r, and find the P-value using a= 0.05. Is there sufficient evidence to conclude that there is a linear correlation between court incomes and justice salaries? Based on the results, does it appear that justices might profit by levying larger fines? Court Income Justice Salary 65.0 406.0 1566.0 1131.0 274.0 253.0 110.0 152.0 31.0 e 29 45 94 58 46 61 25 26 19 The linear correlation coefficient is r= (Round to three decimal places as needed.) The test statistic is t=. (Round to three decimal places as needed.) The P-value is (Round to three decimal places as needed.) V than the significance level 0.05, there court incomes and justice salaries for a significance level of a = 0.05. Because the P-value is V sufficient evidence to support the claim that there is a linear correlation between Based…

After gathering data about the number of starfish and measuring the pollution in areas of the ocean you find a negative linear correlation between pollution levels and number of starfish. What can you conclude based on this information? a. There is a confounding variable that is affecting both pollution and starfish. b. As pollution rises the number of starfish falls c. That pollution is causing starfish to die, leading to the negative correlation d. That pollution is supporting starfish, leading to the negative correlation

Compute and interpret the coefficient of multiple correlation. Number 4 answer is missing.

Based on the scatter plot below on data from Central Harlem, would you estimate the correlation coefficient to be positive, negative, or close to 0? Select the correct correlation and corresponding explanation. Household Income vs. Serious Crime Rate (per 1,000 residents) CentralHarlem Data Scatter Plot: 22- 21- 20- 19- 18- 17 16- 15 32 34 36 38 40 42 Household_Income (thousands) Positive; As the household income increases, the serious crime rate decreases. A. Negative; As the household income increases, the serious crime rate decreases. B. Positive; As the household income increases, the serious crime rate also increases. OC. Negative; As the household income increases, the serious crime rate also increases. D. Close to 0; There is no linear correlation between household income and serious crime rate. E. A Moving to another question will save this response. Question 24 of 25 MacBook Air Serious crime_rate

An LCBO employee compares the relationship between the price of 6 different vintage bottles of wine, and the number of those bottles that have been purchased in the last 3 months to see if there is a correlation between the number of bottles purchased and the price of the bottle. Number of Bottles of Wine Purchased in the Price of Wine Bottle ($) Last 3 Months 44 18 93 65 82 56 25 60 15 30 20 40