Lawyer Lester tries his best to explain to the judge why a previous case should not be used as a precedent for one of his current cases. Lawyer Lester reasons that the previous case's ruling contained remarks from the judge that were not central to the decision. What legal concept is Lawyer Lester using to convince the judge that his case should not be tied to the outcome of a previous case? O Distinguishing the case O Deontology O Legal Realism O Inconsistent Precedent O Dicta
Lawyer Lester tries his best to explain to the judge why a previous case should not be used as a precedent for one of his current cases. Lawyer Lester reasons that the previous case's ruling contained remarks from the judge that were not central to the decision. What legal concept is Lawyer Lester using to convince the judge that his case should not be tied to the outcome of a previous case? O Distinguishing the case O Deontology O Legal Realism O Inconsistent Precedent O Dicta
Related questions
Question
Expert Solution
Step 1: Introduction:
In the legal world, the use of precedent is a fundamental aspect of decision-making, as past cases often serve as a basis for future judgments. However, in certain instances, lawyers may employ various legal strategies to convince a judge that a previous case should not be considered a binding precedent for their current case. One such strategy involves the concept of distinguishing the case, which allows attorneys to highlight key differences between the two cases and argue that the precedent should not apply. This tactic can be crucial in shaping the legal landscape and achieving favorable outcomes for their clients.
Step by step
Solved in 3 steps