Lawyer Lester tries his best to explain to the judge why a previous case should not be used as a precedent for one of his current cases. Lawyer Lester reasons that the previous case's ruling contained remarks from the judge that were not central to the decision. What legal concept is Lawyer Lester using to convince the judge that his case should not be tied to the outcome of a previous case? O Distinguishing the case O Deontology O Legal Realism O Inconsistent Precedent O Dicta
Lawyer Lester tries his best to explain to the judge why a previous case should not be used as a precedent for one of his current cases. Lawyer Lester reasons that the previous case's ruling contained remarks from the judge that were not central to the decision. What legal concept is Lawyer Lester using to convince the judge that his case should not be tied to the outcome of a previous case? O Distinguishing the case O Deontology O Legal Realism O Inconsistent Precedent O Dicta
Related questions
Question
Transcribed Image Text:Lawyer Lester tries his best to explain to the judge why a previous case should not be used as a
precedent for one of his current cases, Lawyer Lester reasons that the previous case's ruling
contained remarks from the judge that were not central to the decision. What legal concept is
Lawyer Lester using to convince the judge that his case should not be tied to the outcome of a
previous case?
O Distinguishing the case
O Deontology
Legal Realism
Inconsistent Precedent
O Dicta
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
Step by step
Solved in 3 steps
