Lauren was accepted at three different graduate schools, and she must choose one. Elite U costs $50,000 per year and did not offer Lauren any financial aid. Lauren values attending Elite U at $60,000 per year. State College costs $30,000 per year and offered Lauren an annual $10,000 scholarship. Lauren values attending State College at $40,000 per year. NoName U costs $20,000 per year and offered Lauren a full $20,000 annual scholarship. Lauren values attending NoName at $15,000 per year. What is Lauren's economic surplus from attending State College instead of her next best alternative? Multiple Choice $40,000 $20,000 $10,000 $5,000

Lauren was accepted at three different graduate schools, and she must choose one. Elite U costs $50,000 per year and did not offer Lauren any financial aid. Lauren values attending Elite U at $60,000 per year. State College costs $30,000 per year and offered Lauren an annual $10,000 scholarship. Lauren values attending State College at $40,000 per year. NoName U costs $20,000 per year and offered Lauren a full $20,000 annual scholarship. Lauren values attending NoName at $15,000 per year. What is Lauren's economic surplus from attending State College instead of her next best alternative? Multiple Choice $40,000 $20,000 $10,000 $5,000

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

A Define "supply." 9.( The definition of supply is very similar to that of demand. Supply is a schedule which shows the various amounts of a product sellers are at each price in a series of possible prices during a specified period, other things being equal. Supply portrays relationship between ( related either in the table or in the (graph). ) and ( ) to produce and offer for sale ) and ( ), they are (directly, inversely) S Describe and give a reason for the law of supply. The law of supply indicates that producers will produce and sell (more, less ) of their product at a high price than at a low price. This means that there is a positive, negative ) relationship between price and quantity supplied. The basic explanation is that, given product costs, a higher price means greater profits and thus more incentive for business to increase the quantity supplied.
Only typed answer
Each term (3 months) the current group of economics students completed a questionnaire as to how much they would spend on new purchases compared to how much they would save/pay off bills, if they suddenly and unexpectedly received a check for $1,000. The average MPC is shown in the table below. Month in which student poll was taken Average of students’ responses as MPC March 0.41 June 0.30 September 0.22 December 0.56 What do these MPC’s imply about the students’ thinking over the course of the year? (Enter response here.) What is likely happening in the economy during the same period of time?
1
tion 26 of 49 > dit 20% Calculate the slope of the line in the figure. * * F1 C * F2 The slope of the line is 0000 -8. 04. -4. 08. 2 ۲ 80 F3 3 ۳ W " **** a F4 $ 4 E E C MacBook A R - FS % 50 ی in 10) LL A 56 T F
4-1 You have noticed that the price of season tickets to your university’s football matches keeps increasing but the supply of tickets remains the same. Why might supply be unresponsive to changes in price? In the longer term, would it be more responsive? How?
Derive TU Schedule from MU Schedule. Amount Consumed MU (units) (utils) 14 12 3 10 4 6
What type of relationship would you expect between thefollowing?a. Sales of hot dogs and sales of hot dog bunsb. The price of winter coats and sales of winter coatsc. The price of personal computers and the production ofpersonal computersd. Sales of toothbrushes and sales of cat foode. The number of children in a family and the number oftoys in a family2. Represent the following data in bar graph form.
1. Table 1 is the data for the per week household consumption Y and income X in the US. Table 1 data for household consumption and income Income per week (US $) (X) Consumption per week (US $) (Y) 80 55, 60, 65, 70, 75 100 65, 70, 74, 80, 85, 88, 120 79, 84, 90, 94, 98 140 80, 93, 95, 103, 108, 113, 115 160 102, 107, 110, 116, 118, 125 180 110, 115, 120, 130, 135, 140 200 120, 136, 140, 144, 145 220 135, 137, 140, 152, 157, 160, 162 240 137, 145, 155, 165, 175, 189 260 150, 152, 175, 178, 180, 185, 191 a. For each Xi, calculate the conditional expectation of Y: E(Y| Xi) b. draw the scattergram, with income being X-axis, consumption being Ү-аxis. c. Draw the E(Y| Xi) on the above figure d. Write the different representations of PRF and SRF. (like Y, = b, +b,X, +u,, E(Y|X = X,)=b, +b,X,, etc.)
1.In income substitution effects acts in opposite direction, then the total effect on consumption is always negative. (T/F)
_______ Refers To an upper limit on the amount of a commodity that can be purchased by an individual unit?
5(ii) Draw & Label a Graph that shows relationship between Cups of Coffee & Amount of Work Hours for the following expression: "The more Coffee I drink, the more Hours I can work."