Justify your stance on why a batch OS can't handle today's demanding software like online booking and cash machines. The performance of a time-shared system is very sensitive to the value selected for a time slice. What would happen if a very large number was selected for the time slice? Let's say it turned out to be too little.

Justify your stance on why a batch OS can't handle today's demanding software like online booking and cash machines. The performance of a time-shared system is very sensitive to the value selected for a time slice. What would happen if a very large number was selected for the time slice? Let's say it turned out to be too little.

Database System Concepts

7th Edition

ISBN:9780078022159

Author:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Publisher:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Chapter1: Introduction

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1PE

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Justify your stance on why a batch OS can't handle today's demanding software like online booking and cash machines. The performance of a time-shared system is very sensitive to the value selected for a time slice. What would happen if a very large number was selected for the time slice? Let's say it turned out to be too little.
When feasible, what are the upsides of prioritizing the I/O queue as the place where processes would be executed? If the I/O connection suddenly goes down, what do you expect to happen? How would this affect the fastest possible CPU burst rate? I'm not quite sure I get what you're getting at here.
On the other hand, a processor that is able to decode encrypted data as well as system instructions has been suggested for implementation. This processor would then proceed to carry out the instructions based on the decoded data as well as the system instructions. The computer will encrypt the submitted suits before judging them. What are some of the benefits of using a processor of this level? In order to use a processor of this kind, what are the prerequisites?
It's possible that running the process in a virtual machine would be the most time- and resource-effective option. What, in your own words and regardless of your opinion, best captures the current situation?
What are the distinctions between time-sharing and distributed systems when it comes to computer operations? How do they fare against one another when put side by side?
The OSI model is useful, but modern computers often lack the necessary hardware to fully implement it. We could employ fewer, less complicated layers that need less care and feeding. Can you think of anything that would go wrong if we utilised fewer layers?
The hardware requirements for a comprehensive OSI model implementation are, however, beyond the capabilities of the majority of the computers in use today. The amount of layers would be cut down to something more straightforward that would need less frequent maintenance. If we employ fewer layers, can you anticipate anything going wrong as a result of this decision?
Someone once observed that "the difference between roles and groups is that a user can shift into and out of roles, whereas that user has a group identity (or identities) that are fixed throughout the session." Consider a system such as a System V-based UNIX system, in which a process can have exactly one group identity. To change groups, users must execute thenewgrpcommand. Do these groups differ from roles? Why or why not?
Explain why a batch operating system would not be able to handle modern applications like airline reservations and ATMS. System performance is very sensitive to the value that is chosen for a time slice in a system that shares time. Explain what would happen if the value you chose for the time slice was too big. Suppose it was too small.
Explain why a batch operating system would not be able to handle modern applications like airline reservations and ATMs.System performance is very sensitive to the value that is chosen for a time slice in a system that shares time. Explain what would happen if the value you chose for the time slice was too big. Suppose it was too small.
The OSI model, on the other hand, calls for a greater number of layers than are often seen in contemporary computer systems. What do you think of the idea that we make it such that there are fewer moving parts overall? Is there anything that may go wrong if we employed fewer layers? / Is there anything that might go wrong?
Yet, the vast majority of modern computers lack the necessary components to carry out an OSI model implementation in an adequate manner. It's possible that we'll utilise fewer, more straightforward layers that need less maintenance. Is there anything that springs to mind that would go awry if there were to be fewer layers used?