ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
14th Edition
ISBN: 9780190931919
Author: NEWNAN
Publisher: Oxford University Press
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Concept explainers
Question
thumb_up100%
Jane has utility function over her net income as follows: U(I) = I ^ 2 Assume that Jane's time present parameter beta = 0.6 and future discount factor delta = 0.9 . When I'm offering her $50 in three months instead of $10 right now , then what is her decision?
Refuse
Accept
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Step by stepSolved in 2 steps
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Similar questions
- Solve the utility maximization problem to find H* and Z* please!arrow_forwardGina is at a toy store and is buying toy T-Rex's (x), which cost på, and toy yaks (y), which cost py. Her income is I. She likes 3 T-Rex's as much as she likes 4 yaks. These toys are perfect substitutes for her.arrow_forwardT/F Explain If preference is strongly convex, the utility function will exhibit dimin- ishing marginal utility (MU).arrow_forward
- Please get correctarrow_forwardEmma has a utility functionU(x1, x2, x3) = logx1+ 0.8 logx2+ 0.72 logx3over her incomes x1, x2, x3 in the next three years. This is an example of(A) expected value;(B) quasi-hyperbolic utility function;(C) standard discounted utility;(D) none of the above. Emma’s preferences can exhibit which of the following behavioral patterns?(A) preference for flexibility;(B) context effects;(C) time inconsistency;(D) intransitivity.arrow_forwardsee attached. Whats the maximum whole dolla amount this individual would spend to insure against the loss of money?arrow_forward
- 2. Suppose Jill derives utility from not only consuming goods, but also from enjoying leisure time. Let her utility function be defined as follows: U=C.25.R.75 where C is a consumption good that can be bought at a price of $1 and R is hours of leisure (relaxation) consumed per day. There are 24 hours in a day and leisure is defined as time spent not working. Jill has a job that pays $w per hour, a trust fund that pays her $M per day, and she can work any number of hours per day, L, she desires. C, consumption good; R, Leisure (relaxation); L, labor M, non-wage income; w, wage rate. a. Derive her labor supply function? b. Assume M = $100, at what wage is her quantity supplied of hours = 0?arrow_forwardIf u(X, Y) = X^(2/3) * Y^(1/3) and pX*X + pY*Y ≤ I, what is the compensation that keeps utility constant when ApX = -1 and (pX, pY, I) = (2, 1, 60) ?arrow_forwardimage attachedarrow_forward
- Consider a consumer who can borrow or lend freely at an interest rate of 100% per period of time (think of the period as being, say, 30 years, a bit like with a mortgage). So r = 1.0, or 100%. The consumer's two-period utility function is: U = In(ct) + (1/2)In(Ct+1) The consumer earn Y=100 each period, so Y₁=100 and Yt+1 also equals 100. If this consumer is behaving optimally, trying to maximize her lifetime utility subject to the IBC, what's her consumption in period t?arrow_forward6. If intertemporal preferences are consistent and the lifetime utility function is additive, then the discount function 8(t) must be (a) bounded (b) exponential (c) hyperbolic (d) linear (e) logarithmicarrow_forwardEconomics Consider two friends Anna and Elsa whose gains and losses are listed as follows: Anna's investment is worth $2.5 million (decreased from $3.5 to $2.5 million) Elsa's investment is worth $2.2 million (increased from $2 to $2.2 million) For each of them write down the reference utility function (First determine the reference point (use a parameter) and derive reference utility function for each).arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
- Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSONEngineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
- Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134078779
Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134870069
Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781305585126
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:9781337106665
Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...
Economics
ISBN:9781259290619
Author:Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education