Jacqueline was the bookkeeper for Vop, Inc. To pay a gambling debt, Jacqueline took $5,000 in cash that was to be deposited in Vop's bank account. Jacqueline then altered Vop's accounting records to hide her actions. In a criminal case against Jacqueline, what is the burden of proof? Preponderance of the evidence. Clear and convincing evidence. Beyond a reasonable doubt. Probable cause.

Jacqueline was the bookkeeper for Vop, Inc. To pay a gambling debt, Jacqueline took $5,000 in cash that was to be deposited in Vop's bank account. Jacqueline then altered Vop's accounting records to hide her actions. In a criminal case against Jacqueline, what is the burden of proof? Preponderance of the evidence. Clear and convincing evidence. Beyond a reasonable doubt. Probable cause.

Principles Of Marketing

17th Edition

ISBN:9780134492513

Author:Kotler, Philip, Armstrong, Gary (gary M.)

Publisher:Kotler, Philip, Armstrong, Gary (gary M.)

Chapter1: Marketing: Creating Customer Value And Engagement

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1.1DQ

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Sam Simpleton, a resident of Kansas, and Nellie Naive, a resident of Missouri, each bought $85,000 in stock at local offices in their home States from Evil Stockbrokers, Inc. (“Evil”), a business incorporated in Delaware, with its principal place of business in Kansas. Both Simpleton and Naive believe that they were cheated by Evil Stockbrokers and would like to sue Evil for fraud. Assuming that no Federal question is at issue, assess the accuracy of the following statements: a. Simpleton can sue Evil in a Kansas State trial court. b. Simpleton can sue Evil in a Federal district court in Kansas. c. Naive can sue Evil in a Missouri State trial court. d. Naive can sue Evil in a Federal district court in Missouri.
Federal laws such as the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act and HIPPA, apply to claims handling and to the professional activities of the claims representative. True False
swiper steals Dora's gold watch and sells it to Marni for $100. Marni does not know that Swiper stole the watch from Dora.In a lawsuit by Dora against Swiper and Marni, a. has no recourse against Swiper or Marni b. Dora may not obtain the watch back from Marni c. has the legal right to a return of the watch from Marni d. may demand that Swiper buy her a new watch that looks like the one he stole from her.
Robert sold used cars, but he had little or no knowledge with respect to the technical aspects of any of the vehicles that he sold. Ray was seeking to buy a Honda Civic and Robert gave his opinion as to the speed of the car and its durability. Ray subsequently finalized the purchase and took control of the car. Two weeks after the purchase, the Honda Civic broke down and required extensive mechanical repairs. Ray is angry and is of the view that Robert misrepresented the condition of the car when he sold it. Ray is of the opinion that as a Used Car Salesmen, Robert should have known that the car was indeed in poor mechanical condition. Ray knows that you are studying Business Law at UWI Open Campus and sought your advice on the matter. Please advise Ray.
Alden had her car radiator repaired by Smokey Garage for $125. She was not happy with the results and decided to sue the garage owner to get her money back. In what court would her case most likely be heard? Why?
Pablo, a resident of New Mexico, while driving through Arizona, was struck by an SUV driven by Derek, a resident of California. Derek was speeding when the accident happened, and Pablo suffered severe injuries that ruined a potential acting career. Pablo's damages are estimated at $200,000. What type of case is this?
As a process server, John routinely serves process on unsuspecting Defendants. On one occasion, John attempted to serve Todd. John, the process server, appeared at Todd's home and knocked on the door. A woman appeared and called Todd to the front door. John handed Todd a copy of a summons and complaint. Todd, upon noticing what the documents were, ripped the papers in half, dropped them to the ground and closed the door. What is the type of service of process John attempted on Todd? Has Todd been properly served?
David hires Nell to auction off his grandmother's house and it's contents. Nell hires an auctioneer, rents a tent, advertises and does everything necessary to conduct a successful auction. When the auction is over, David refuses to pay for the auctioneer and advertisting expenses, claiming he never specifically authorized Nell to incur those expenses on his behalf. In her defense, Nell can claim that David gave her: 1) Apparent Authority. 2) Moral Authority. 3) Implied Authority. 4) Express Authority.
Pattie purchases a couch from Good Stuff, Inc., to use in her home. She pays for the couch, and Good Stuff agrees to deliver it. Unfortunately, on the way to her house, the delivery truck overheats and burns, destroying the truck and the couch inside. Pattie asks for a refund or another couch. Good Stuff’s owner refuses. If Pattie decides to sue Good Stuff, which party is likely to prevail? Explain. (In your answer, be sure to identify and discuss which law(s) might apply and how that could affect the outcome.)
Vinson had a severe gambling problem. Every night, he stayed awake to the early hours of the morning picking games and spreads and betting online or calling his bookie. Finally, Vinson's wife, Bethany, had enough of Vinson's gambling. Bethany entered into a written contract with Hyacinth, a gambling addiction therapist who agreed to treat Vinson twice a week for six months. The contract is signed in writing (by the contract parties. Bethany and Hyacinth; and, of course, also by the patient, Vinson). Vinson then begins his counseling. However, after two months. Bethany sees no improvement in Vinson's behavior. After all, her debit cards just got declined at the store, and when she confronted Vinson, he simply stated, "I lost $1,000 on the Miami Marlins last night." Bethany decides she is going to breach the contract, that is, to stop paying Hyacinth. What would a court most likely find, if Hyacinth sues Bethany to enforce the contract and make Bethany pay for the breach? O UCC Article 2…
Randi buys a toaster. The next morning, when Randi uses it to toast a bagel, the toaster explodes and injures Randi. Who is liable? No one b. The seller only C. The seller and manufacturer d. The manufacturer only a.
Brandt Crossing Investments, Inc., was a family-owned property investment organization, investing in undeveloped properties when prices were low and then selling them when prices went up. Among its holdings, Brandt Crossing owned fifty acres of undeveloped land next to another fifty acres of undeveloped land owned by Khloe Hadid. Carter Rios, property manager for Brandt Crossing, approached Hadid and offered to purchase her fifty acres “for Brandt.” Hadid sold the property for $50,000. Within one year, Brandt Crossing sold its 100 acres, including the property bought from Hadid, to a developer for $1,000,000. Richard Brandt, a 5% owner of Brandt Crossing Investments and an old high school acquaintance of Hadid, saw her at the mall and told her of the recent sale. Furious that she had lost out on the income and convinced that Rios had misled her, Hadid sued Richard Brandt for the acts of his agent, Rios. Hadid argued that the facts were sufficient to create an agency by estoppel…