Is it feasible to differentiate between the computer's architecture and its organization? You are allowed to provide whichever examples you see acceptable.

Whether there is a distinction between "computer architecture" and "computer organization," or whether the two terms may be used interchangeably, was something I was pondering. Could you provide examples that are as precise as you can?

To what extent do the computer's internal components contribute to its overall functionality? Justify your brevity of explanation.

Is it feasible to differentiate between the computer structure and the computer architecture? Please offer concrete cases.

Is there a difference between the organization of a computer and the architecture of a computer? Do you have any examples that you could share?

Is it possible to distinguish between the architecture of a computer and the organisation of a computer? You are free to offer any instances that you see appropriate.

It is possible for a computer system to generate and process information in a variety of distinct ways because to its adaptable nature. I was wondering whether it would be feasible to construct two of these.

I was wondering whether the terms "computer architecture" and "computer organization," which appear to indicate the same thing, might be used interchangeably. If you're going to cite an example, try to be as explicit as possible.

I'm going to talk about the current three dimensions that a computer system possesses.

It would appear to defeat the purpose to design a computer with software already loaded into its read-only memory (ROM).