Is it feasible to describe the ideas of coupling and cohesion when applied to the context of object-oriented programming analysis and design?

You were instructed throughout your computer science course to establish a connection between the components of object-oriented systems and everyday objects. What was the rationale behind your action?

Give a thorough breakdown of the functional differences between procedural and object-oriented programming.

When it comes to the analysis and design of object-oriented programming, are the concepts "coupling" and "cohesion" capable of being defined?

When it comes to object-oriented programming, are there any possible problems associated with the notions of data abstraction and control abstraction?

Is it possible to describe coupling and harmony in the context of object-oriented computer research and design?

Object-oriented design needs to be used whenever it makes sense to do so. Structured design is a choice that can be used when the situation calls for it. what might be making this happen, etc.

What is the significance of utilising access modifiers in object-oriented programming? What are the comparative benefits of this option in relation to other alternatives? Elucidate the rationales for utilising them in a specific context.

Object-oriented design should be employed whenever it makes sense to do so, which is pretty much everything. When the conditions call for it, the use of structured design is an alternative that may be considered appropriate. what are some of the possible explanations for this, etc.