INTRODUCTION The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS- CoV-2) was recognized in January 2020 as the agent responsible for the coronavirus disease (COVID-19), whose worldwide out- break led to the declaration of a global pandemic by the World Health Organization (WHO) on March 11, 2020. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, governments across the globe have implemented strict measures limiting physical interpersonal con- tact to reduce the spread of the virus. Human sexual behavior is likely affected by such measures, which has raised concern among sexual health experts regarding the negative outcomes the pan- demic may have on sexual health. Specifically, sexual health pro- fessionals are concerned about increases in sexual dysfunction and relationship conflict, as well as a negative impact on access to sexual healthcare. In addition, there is concern that quarantine measures and increases in relationship conflict may lead to an increase in intimate partner violence. 4.5 Preliminary evidence has supported some of these experts' concerns. For instance, one recent national survey in the United States found that 34% of individuals in a relationship reported relationship conflict due to COVID-19, and couples with more conflict also reported greater decrease in solitary and partnered sexual activities. Another survey of married individuals in the United States found that 32% of respondents reported COVID- 19 was straining their marriage. However, 74% also reported feeling the pandemic was strengthening their relationship, and the impact on sexual frequency was mixed, with 32% reporting an increase and 20% reporting a decrease. Interestingly, a recent longitudinal survey found that stress related to COVID-19 pre- dicted both increased relationship satisfaction as well as decreased sex drive and sexual activity at both the within-person and between-person levels. 9,10 Other preliminary evidence, from both the United States and other countries, has suggested that additional changes to sexual behavior are occurring, such as decreased casual sex" and increased use of pornography and sexting/cybersex. ¹2 The pan- demic may also facilitate experimentation with new ways of relat- ing to others socially as well as sexually. For example, Lehmiller et al ¹2 found that engaging in novel sexual activities during the pandemic (such as new sexual positions, sharing fantasies, or using technology) was protective against the pandemic's deleteri- ous effects on sexual satisfaction. Nevertheless, there remain few studies examining the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on sexual health in the United States, and many studies have methodological deficiencies including small convenience samples that overrepresent or are limited to certain demographics such as women¹2 LGBTQ+ individuals,12,13 or married couples. In addition, studies published to date were largely conducted in the first few months of the pandemic when lockdown measures were just starting to take effect. Since the public health response to this pandemic also requires attention to sexual health as a fundamental pillar of physical and mental well-being, the aim of this study is to analyze the impact of COVID-19 on the sexual behaviors, sexual functioning, and intimate partner violence in the United States. This study adds to the findings of previous research by collecting a large national convenience sample and examining a wide variety of sexual behaviors several months into the pandemic. During this period (October 2020), individuals and government had been given numerous months to adapt to the novel circumstances, and many states in the United States had eased lockdown restrictions after summer surges in COVID-19 cases had subsided. Thus, col- lecting data in this period provides the opportunity to observe how COVID-19 continued to impact sexual behav- iors after several months. Given the exploratory nature of this study and the limited prior research, specific a priori hypotheses were not generated. Rather, this study aimed to answer the question: How has the COVID-19 pandemic impacted the frequency of various partnered and solitary sex- ual behaviors, sexual functioning and satisfaction, relationship satisfaction, and intimate partner violence? METHODS Participants Approval for this study was obtained from [sponsor insti- tution's] IRB. Participants were recruited from the Amazon Mechanical Turk (Mturk) platform. This platform allows ver- ified workers to accept tasks from requesters in exchange for payments to their Mturk accounts. A total of 1,474 surveys were started. Of these, 177 surveys were incomplete, 33 were eliminated due to participants taking the survey twice, 250 surveys were rejected due to incorrect responses to the atten- tion check questions, and 23 were excluded from analysis because no sexual behaviors were reported. This resulted in a sample of 1,051 participants from 48 U.S. states. Full descriptive statistics for participant demographics are listed in Table 1. Procedure Mturk workers were recruited to complete the survey and were compensated $5 USD after completion of a valid survey. After giving consent, participants were asked questions about how frequently they engaged in various sexual behaviors before and after the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. When consider- ing their behavior before and after the start of the pandemic, they were asked to use the reference date of March 11, 2020 as the start of the pandemic, as this was the date the World Health Organization declared COVID-19 a pandemic. Participants then completed the other study measures and demographics questions.

Human Anatomy & Physiology (11th Edition)
11th Edition
ISBN:9780134580999
Author:Elaine N. Marieb, Katja N. Hoehn
Publisher:Elaine N. Marieb, Katja N. Hoehn
Chapter1: The Human Body: An Orientation
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1RQ: The correct sequence of levels forming the structural hierarchy is A. (a) organ, organ system,...
icon
Related questions
Question

how did they do reasearch? based on attached image 

1852
INTRODUCTION
The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-
CoV-2) was recognized in January 2020 as the agent responsible
for the coronavirus disease (COVID-19), whose worldwide out-
break led to the declaration of a global pandemic by the World
Health Organization (WHO) on March 11, 2020.¹ In response
to the COVID-19 pandemic, governments across the globe have
implemented strict measures limiting physical interpersonal con-
tact to reduce the spread of the virus. Human sexual behavior is
likely affected by such measures, which has raised concern among
sexual health experts regarding the negative outcomes the pan-
demic may have on sexual health.² Specifically, sexual health |
pro-
fessionals are concerned about increases in sexual dysfunction
and relationship conflict, as well as a negative impact on access to
sexual healthcare.³ In addition, there is concern that quarantine
measures and increases in relationship conflict may lead to an
increase in intimate
violence.
partner
Preliminary evidence has supported some of these experts'
concerns. For instance, one recent national survey in the United
States found that 34% of individuals in a relationship reported
relationship conflict due to COVID-19, and couples with more
conflict also reported greater decrease in solitary and partnered
sexual activities. Another survey of married individuals in the
United States found that 32% of respondents reported COVID-
19 was straining their marriage. However, 74% also reported
feeling the pandemic was strengthening their relationship, and
the impact on sexual frequency was mixed, with 32% reporting
an increase and 20% reporting a decrease. Interestingly, a recent
longitudinal survey found that stress related to COVID-19 pre-
dicted both increased relationship satisfaction as well as decreased
sex drive and sexual activity at both the within-person and
between-person levels.8
Other preliminary evidence, from both the United States and
other countries, has suggested that additional changes to sexual
behavior are occurring, such as decreased casual sex,¹0 and
increased use of pornography and sexting/cybersex. 12 The pan-
demic may also facilitate experimentation with new ways of relat-
ing to others socially as well as sexually. For example, Lehmiller
et al¹² found that engaging in novel sexual activities during the
pandemic (such as new sexual positions, sharing fantasies, or
using technology) was protective against the pandemic's deleteri-
ous effects on sexual satisfaction.
Nevertheless, there remain few studies examining the impact of
the COVID-19 pandemic on sexual health in the United States,
and many studies have methodological deficiencies including small
convenience samples that overrepresent or are limited to certain
demographics such as women LGBTQ+ individuals 9,12,13 or
married couples. In addition, studies published to date were
largely conducted in the first few months of the pandemic when
lockdown measures were just starting to take effect.
Since the public health response to this pandemic also
requires attention to sexual health as a fundamental pillar of
Gleason et al
physical and mental well-being, the aim of this study is to
analyze the impact of COVID-19 on the sexual behaviors,
sexual functioning, and intimate partner violence in the
United States. This study adds to the findings of previous
research by collecting a large national convenience sample
and examining a wide variety of sexual behaviors several
months into the pandemic. During this period (October
2020), individuals and government had been given numerous
months to adapt to the novel circumstances, and many states
in the United States had eased lockdown restrictions after
summer surges in COVID-19 cases had subsided. Thus, col-
lecting data in this period provides the opportunity to
observe how COVID-19 continued to impact sexual behav-
iors after several months. Given the exploratory nature of
this study and the limited prior research, specific a priori
hypotheses were not generated. Rather, this study aimed to
answer the question: How has the COVID-19 pandemic
impacted the frequency of various partnered and solitary sex-
ual behaviors, sexual functioning and satisfaction, relationship
satisfaction, and intimate partner violence?
METHODS
Participants
Approval for this study was obtained from [sponsor insti-
tution's] IRB. Participants were recruited from the Amazon
Mechanical Turk (Mturk) platform. This platform allows ver-
ified workers to accept tasks from requesters in exchange for
payments to their Mturk accounts. A total of 1,474 surveys
were started. Of these, 177 surveys were incomplete, 33 were
eliminated due to participants taking the survey twice, 250
surveys were rejected due to incorrect responses to the atten-
tion check questions, and 23 were excluded from analysis
because no sexual behaviors were reported. This resulted in a
sample of 1,051 participants from 48 U.S. states. Full
descriptive statistics for participant demographics are listed in
Table 1.
Procedure
Mturk workers were recruited to complete the survey and
were compensated $5 USD after completion of a valid survey.
After giving consent, participants were asked questions about
how frequently they engaged in various sexual behaviors before
and after the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. When consider-
ing their behavior before and after the start of the pandemic,
they were asked to use the reference date of March 11, 2020 as
the start of the pandemic, as this was the date the World Health
Organization declared COVID-19 a pandemic. Participants
then completed the other study measures and demographics
questions.
J Sex Med 2021;18:1851-1862
Transcribed Image Text:1852 INTRODUCTION The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS- CoV-2) was recognized in January 2020 as the agent responsible for the coronavirus disease (COVID-19), whose worldwide out- break led to the declaration of a global pandemic by the World Health Organization (WHO) on March 11, 2020.¹ In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, governments across the globe have implemented strict measures limiting physical interpersonal con- tact to reduce the spread of the virus. Human sexual behavior is likely affected by such measures, which has raised concern among sexual health experts regarding the negative outcomes the pan- demic may have on sexual health.² Specifically, sexual health | pro- fessionals are concerned about increases in sexual dysfunction and relationship conflict, as well as a negative impact on access to sexual healthcare.³ In addition, there is concern that quarantine measures and increases in relationship conflict may lead to an increase in intimate violence. partner Preliminary evidence has supported some of these experts' concerns. For instance, one recent national survey in the United States found that 34% of individuals in a relationship reported relationship conflict due to COVID-19, and couples with more conflict also reported greater decrease in solitary and partnered sexual activities. Another survey of married individuals in the United States found that 32% of respondents reported COVID- 19 was straining their marriage. However, 74% also reported feeling the pandemic was strengthening their relationship, and the impact on sexual frequency was mixed, with 32% reporting an increase and 20% reporting a decrease. Interestingly, a recent longitudinal survey found that stress related to COVID-19 pre- dicted both increased relationship satisfaction as well as decreased sex drive and sexual activity at both the within-person and between-person levels.8 Other preliminary evidence, from both the United States and other countries, has suggested that additional changes to sexual behavior are occurring, such as decreased casual sex,¹0 and increased use of pornography and sexting/cybersex. 12 The pan- demic may also facilitate experimentation with new ways of relat- ing to others socially as well as sexually. For example, Lehmiller et al¹² found that engaging in novel sexual activities during the pandemic (such as new sexual positions, sharing fantasies, or using technology) was protective against the pandemic's deleteri- ous effects on sexual satisfaction. Nevertheless, there remain few studies examining the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on sexual health in the United States, and many studies have methodological deficiencies including small convenience samples that overrepresent or are limited to certain demographics such as women LGBTQ+ individuals 9,12,13 or married couples. In addition, studies published to date were largely conducted in the first few months of the pandemic when lockdown measures were just starting to take effect. Since the public health response to this pandemic also requires attention to sexual health as a fundamental pillar of Gleason et al physical and mental well-being, the aim of this study is to analyze the impact of COVID-19 on the sexual behaviors, sexual functioning, and intimate partner violence in the United States. This study adds to the findings of previous research by collecting a large national convenience sample and examining a wide variety of sexual behaviors several months into the pandemic. During this period (October 2020), individuals and government had been given numerous months to adapt to the novel circumstances, and many states in the United States had eased lockdown restrictions after summer surges in COVID-19 cases had subsided. Thus, col- lecting data in this period provides the opportunity to observe how COVID-19 continued to impact sexual behav- iors after several months. Given the exploratory nature of this study and the limited prior research, specific a priori hypotheses were not generated. Rather, this study aimed to answer the question: How has the COVID-19 pandemic impacted the frequency of various partnered and solitary sex- ual behaviors, sexual functioning and satisfaction, relationship satisfaction, and intimate partner violence? METHODS Participants Approval for this study was obtained from [sponsor insti- tution's] IRB. Participants were recruited from the Amazon Mechanical Turk (Mturk) platform. This platform allows ver- ified workers to accept tasks from requesters in exchange for payments to their Mturk accounts. A total of 1,474 surveys were started. Of these, 177 surveys were incomplete, 33 were eliminated due to participants taking the survey twice, 250 surveys were rejected due to incorrect responses to the atten- tion check questions, and 23 were excluded from analysis because no sexual behaviors were reported. This resulted in a sample of 1,051 participants from 48 U.S. states. Full descriptive statistics for participant demographics are listed in Table 1. Procedure Mturk workers were recruited to complete the survey and were compensated $5 USD after completion of a valid survey. After giving consent, participants were asked questions about how frequently they engaged in various sexual behaviors before and after the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. When consider- ing their behavior before and after the start of the pandemic, they were asked to use the reference date of March 11, 2020 as the start of the pandemic, as this was the date the World Health Organization declared COVID-19 a pandemic. Participants then completed the other study measures and demographics questions. J Sex Med 2021;18:1851-1862
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Respiratory infections
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, biology and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Human Anatomy & Physiology (11th Edition)
Human Anatomy & Physiology (11th Edition)
Biology
ISBN:
9780134580999
Author:
Elaine N. Marieb, Katja N. Hoehn
Publisher:
PEARSON
Biology 2e
Biology 2e
Biology
ISBN:
9781947172517
Author:
Matthew Douglas, Jung Choi, Mary Ann Clark
Publisher:
OpenStax
Anatomy & Physiology
Anatomy & Physiology
Biology
ISBN:
9781259398629
Author:
McKinley, Michael P., O'loughlin, Valerie Dean, Bidle, Theresa Stouter
Publisher:
Mcgraw Hill Education,
Molecular Biology of the Cell (Sixth Edition)
Molecular Biology of the Cell (Sixth Edition)
Biology
ISBN:
9780815344322
Author:
Bruce Alberts, Alexander D. Johnson, Julian Lewis, David Morgan, Martin Raff, Keith Roberts, Peter Walter
Publisher:
W. W. Norton & Company
Laboratory Manual For Human Anatomy & Physiology
Laboratory Manual For Human Anatomy & Physiology
Biology
ISBN:
9781260159363
Author:
Martin, Terry R., Prentice-craver, Cynthia
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Publishing Co.
Inquiry Into Life (16th Edition)
Inquiry Into Life (16th Edition)
Biology
ISBN:
9781260231700
Author:
Sylvia S. Mader, Michael Windelspecht
Publisher:
McGraw Hill Education