ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
14th Edition
ISBN: 9780190931919
Author: NEWNAN
Publisher: Oxford University Press
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
In Salop’s model of entry deterrence, the unconstrained
(A) Why do we expect 2 v1 to be less than 100 ?
(B) The incumbent monopoly can prevent entry by expending a fixed and irreversible amount C that the entrant must match. What conditions on the size of C will both successfully prevent entry, and equally importantly, result in greater profit for the incumbent than by allowing entry?
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Step by stepSolved in 2 steps
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Similar questions
- Suppose ABC is still a monopolist selling to the two retailers but it now discovers that if retailers supply customer services, demand shifts to P = 90 – Q. Each retailer can provide the required services at a total cost of $400. c. ABC decides to implement an RPM agreement with retailers. Under this agreement, what retail price should ABC specify? How many units will retailers sell at this price? d. Under this RPM agreement, what is the maximum wholesale price that ABC can set? In answering this question, assume that at the RPM price competitive pressure forces each retailer to offer the required services (i.e., any retailer offering a lower service level loses all its customers). e. What is the consumer surplus and profits at this wholesale price? Has the RPM agreement improved social welfare?arrow_forwardA monopoly sells its good in the U.S. and Japanese markets. The American inverse demand function is Pa = 90 - Qa' and the Japanese inverse demand function is P₁ = 80 - 2Qj, where both prices, På and p₁, are measured in dollars. The firm's marginal cost of production is m = $25 in both countries. If the firm can prevent resales, what price will it charge in both markets? (Hint: The monopoly determines its optimal (monopoly) price in each country separately because customers cannot resell the good.) The equilibrium price in Japan is $ (round your answer to the nearest penny) The equilibrium price in the U.S. is $. (round your answer to the nearest penny)arrow_forwardPlease answer all parts...arrow_forward
- A monopoly produces a good with a network externality at a constant marginal and average cost of c = $2. In the first period, its inverse demand curve is p 14-1Q. In the second period, its inverse demand curve is p=14-1Q unless it sells at least Q = 8 units in the first period. If it meets or exceeds this target, then the demand curve rotates out by a (it sells a times as many units for any given price), so that its inverse demand curve is p=14- - 1/10. The monopoly knows that it can sell no output after the second period. The monopoly's objective is to maximize the sum of its profits over the two periods. For what values of a would the monopoly earn a higher two-period profit by setting a lower price in the first period? . (round your answer to two decimal places) If a isarrow_forwardA monopoly sells its good in the U.S. and Japanese markets. The American inverse demand function is Pa = 120-Q₂. and the Japanese inverse demand function is P₁ = 100-2Q₁ where both prices, p, and p,, are measured in dollars. The firm's marginal cost of production is m = $20 in both countries. If the firm can prevent resales, what price will it charge in both markets? (Hint: The monopoly determines its optimal (monopoly) price in each country separately because customers cannot resell the good.) The equilibrium price in Japan is $. (round your answer to the nearest penny)arrow_forwardSuppose the monopolist with a marginal cost of 2 is facing two of customers i = {L, H} with the following demand functions: Customer H: qH Customer L: qL = = 6- PH 4- PL The consumer's total payment T;(q) is T;(q) = A; + piq with lump sum payment A and per unit price p. = a. Assume that the monopolist can distinguish between the two groups of consumers. Further, suppose that A₁ 0, meaning the monopolist is charging uniform prices. Find the profit maximizing price the monopolist charges customer H and the price the monopolist charges customer L. b. Assume that the monopolist can perfectly distinguish between the two groups of consumers and can utilize a lump sum payment A¡ > 0. Find the two part tariff the monopolist charges customer H and the two part tariff charged to customer L.arrow_forward
- There are two firms in a market, where quantities are the strategic variable within two periods. In each of the two periods t = 1; 2 the inverse demand function Ptis given by P: (y') = 5-y'. The cost function of firm i is given by C=3+2y, where i=1,2. In the first period firm1 is a protected monopolist. Profits of a firm can be interpreted as the sum of its profits in each period. In order to maximize their profits, firms set quantities. Define the monopoly solution. (i) (ii) Firm1 must choose the same quantity in each period y = yf due to the technological restrictions. Considering ył firm2 thinking to enter in period 2. Define the profit maximizing yi if y is given. (iii) Suppose that firm 2 will enter in the second period. What quantity will firm 1 have? What is the equilibrium P, Q and profit?arrow_forwardI need the answer as soon as possiblearrow_forwardSuppose that the monopolist can produce with total cost: TC = goods in two different markets separated by some distance. The demand curves in the first market and the second market are given by Q = 120 - 2P, and Q2 = 240 - 2P,. Suppose that consumers can mail the product from cheaper location to a more expensive location freely (mailing cost $0). What would be the monopolist profit? 10Q. Assume that the monopolist sells its $8000 $7200 $6000 $6400arrow_forward
- Economics A market comprises two consumers groups: high- demand types and low-demand types. Assume there are 100 consumers of each type. The high types have demand QH = 14 – Pand low types have demand QL = 12 – P. Assume the marginal (and average) cost is 4 and there are no fixed costs. If the monopolist firm is able to distinguish between the two consumer types and using block pricing to extract maximum profit, how much profit will they earn in total? Select one: а. 9000 b. 6800 С. 8200 d. 7200arrow_forwardAn airline has exclusive landing rights at the local airport. The airline flies one flight per day to New York City with a plane that has a seating capacity of 100. The cost of flying the plane per day is $4,000 + 10q, where q is the number of passengers. The number of seats to New York demanded is q = 165 - .5p and so marginal revenue is 330 - 4q. Assume the airline maximizes monopoly profits. (i) What will be the difference between the marginal cost of flying an extra passenger and the amount the marginal passenger is willing to pay to fly to New York City? (ii) What is the loss of consumer surplus from not filling the plane on each flight? (iii) Would it possible to reduce DWL to zero for this market? Explainarrow_forwardTopside Tiles, which produces roofing tiles, is a local monopoly. Its inverse demand function is p=140-2Q, and its constant marginal cost is 10. The owner has delegated the decision of how much output to produce to the plant manager. The manager's income, Y, is 5% of revenue: Y=0.05R. Show that a manager who wishes to maximize income, Y, will choose an output that exceeds the profit-maximizing level. Is there a conflict of interest between the owner and manager? Is this situation an agency problem? (Hint: This problem can be solved using a graph, by using calculus, or by using the rule that the MR curve has twice the slope of the demand curve.) The output that maximizes profit is (Enter your response rounded to one decimal place.) units.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
- Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSONEngineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
- Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134078779
Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134870069
Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781305585126
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:9781337106665
Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...
Economics
ISBN:9781259290619
Author:Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education