In exercises 7-10, use a sequence of valid arguments to show that each argument is valid. 7. If we sell the boat (b), then we will not go to the river (~r). If we don't go to the river, then we will go to camping (c). If we do not buy a tent (-t), then we will not go to camping. Therefore, if we sell the boat then we will buy a tent. 8. If it is an ammonite (a), then it is from cretaceous period (c). If it is not from Mesozoic era (~m), then it is not from the cretaceous period. It is from Mesozoic era, then it is at least 65 million years old (s). Therefore, if it is an ammonite, then it is at least 65 million years old. 9. If the computer is not operating (-o), then I will not be able to finish my report (-f). If the office is closed (c), then the computer is not operating. Therefore, if I am able to finish my report, then the office is open.

Advanced Engineering Mathematics
10th Edition
ISBN:9780470458365
Author:Erwin Kreyszig
Publisher:Erwin Kreyszig
Chapter2: Second-order Linear Odes
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1RQ
icon
Related questions
Question
PLEASE MAKE YOUR ANSWER TYPEWRITTEN AND NOT HANDWRITTEN Please use the given lesson attached as reference
In exercises 7-10, use a sequence of valid arguments to show that each argument is valid.
7. If we sell the boat (b), then we will not go to the river (~r). If we don't go to the river, then we
will go to camping (c). If we do not buy a tent (-t), then we will not go to camping. Therefore, if
we sell the boat then we will buy a tent.
8. If it is an ammonite (a), then it is from cretaceous period (c). If it is not from Mesozoic era
(~m), then it is not from the cretaceous period. It is from Mesozoic era, then it is at least 65
million years old (s). Therefore, if it is an ammonite, then it is at least 65 million years old.
9. If the computer is not operating (~o), then I will not be able to finish my report (~f). If the office
is closed (c), then the computer is not operating. Therefore, if I am able to finish my report, then
the office is open.
10. If he reads the manuscript (r), he will like it. (1) If he likes it, he will publish it (p). If he
publishes it, then you will get royalties (m). You did not get royalties. Therefore, he did not read
the manuscript.
Transcribed Image Text:In exercises 7-10, use a sequence of valid arguments to show that each argument is valid. 7. If we sell the boat (b), then we will not go to the river (~r). If we don't go to the river, then we will go to camping (c). If we do not buy a tent (-t), then we will not go to camping. Therefore, if we sell the boat then we will buy a tent. 8. If it is an ammonite (a), then it is from cretaceous period (c). If it is not from Mesozoic era (~m), then it is not from the cretaceous period. It is from Mesozoic era, then it is at least 65 million years old (s). Therefore, if it is an ammonite, then it is at least 65 million years old. 9. If the computer is not operating (~o), then I will not be able to finish my report (~f). If the office is closed (c), then the computer is not operating. Therefore, if I am able to finish my report, then the office is open. 10. If he reads the manuscript (r), he will like it. (1) If he likes it, he will publish it (p). If he publishes it, then you will get royalties (m). You did not get royalties. Therefore, he did not read the manuscript.
Example 4.5
In each argument, use all premises to determine the valid conclusion.
1. We will not go to japan (-j) or we will go to Hong Kong (h). If we visit my uncle (u). then we
will go to Singapore (s). If we go to Hong Kong then we will not go to Singapore.
Solution:
Write the argument in symbolic form.
~jvh
UIS
h→-s
Premise 1
Premise 2
Premise 3
The first premise can be written as j→ h. The contrapositive of the second premise is ~s →~u.
Therefore the argument can be written as
j-h
Interchanging the second and third premises yields
~S1~U
h→-s
j→h
h→-s
~Su
By transitive reasoning the valid conclusion will be ju. Thus the valid conclusion for the
argument is "If we go to Japan, then we will not visit my uncle."
Transcribed Image Text:Example 4.5 In each argument, use all premises to determine the valid conclusion. 1. We will not go to japan (-j) or we will go to Hong Kong (h). If we visit my uncle (u). then we will go to Singapore (s). If we go to Hong Kong then we will not go to Singapore. Solution: Write the argument in symbolic form. ~jvh UIS h→-s Premise 1 Premise 2 Premise 3 The first premise can be written as j→ h. The contrapositive of the second premise is ~s →~u. Therefore the argument can be written as j-h Interchanging the second and third premises yields ~S1~U h→-s j→h h→-s ~Su By transitive reasoning the valid conclusion will be ju. Thus the valid conclusion for the argument is "If we go to Japan, then we will not visit my uncle."
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps with 2 images

Blurred answer
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
Advanced Engineering Mathematics
Advanced Engineering Mathematics
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780470458365
Author:
Erwin Kreyszig
Publisher:
Wiley, John & Sons, Incorporated
Numerical Methods for Engineers
Numerical Methods for Engineers
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780073397924
Author:
Steven C. Chapra Dr., Raymond P. Canale
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
Introductory Mathematics for Engineering Applicat…
Introductory Mathematics for Engineering Applicat…
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9781118141809
Author:
Nathan Klingbeil
Publisher:
WILEY
Mathematics For Machine Technology
Mathematics For Machine Technology
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9781337798310
Author:
Peterson, John.
Publisher:
Cengage Learning,
Basic Technical Mathematics
Basic Technical Mathematics
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780134437705
Author:
Washington
Publisher:
PEARSON
Topology
Topology
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780134689517
Author:
Munkres, James R.
Publisher:
Pearson,