In 2009 General Motors (GM) announced that it would reduce employment by 21,000 workers. What does this decision reveal about how GM viewed its marginal revenue product (MRP) and marginal resource cost (MRC)? Why didn’t GM reduce employment by more than 21,000 workers? By fewer than 21,000 workers?

Mainly concerned with how to answer part b.

Utilize the following information to answer the following question, which assumes perfectly competitive markets: Wage (MFC):$40 Price of good sold (P):$2 Marginal physical product (MPP) from the 8 th workers hired: 20 Question: Should the firm increase the amount of workers hired? A. Yes, due to the fact MRP>MFC. Therefore, a firm can maximize profits by hiring additional workers. B. Yes, due to the fact MFC=MRP. Therefore profits can be increased by hiring additional workers. C. No, the firm should hire exactly 8 workers because at that point MRP=MFC; which is the profit maximizing level of labor hired. D.No. the firm should hire exactly 8 workers because at that point MRP>MFC; which is the profit maximizing level of labor hired.