how is the statment a good example of why qualitative methodologie is more valuable in advancing cross-cultural research? I think qualitative methodologies are very valuable in advancing cross-cultural research. Qualitative methodologies are used in cross-cultural research by cultural anthropologist for what are called ethnographies. Ethnographies involve observation and field-work within the cultural context and require descriptive qualitative analysis. Some of the advantages of studies involving two or three countries compared to studies that involve ten or more countries are a more concentrated and have a smaller study group. Another advantage is being able to report various cultural variables as it relates to the study and qualitative data. A few disadvantages of studies involving two or three countries compared to involving ten or more countries are the potential for inaccurate results if it does not include the entire population. Another disadvantage of three countries in a study instead of ten countries in the study are the potential for high bias due to a lack of representation, and lastly for example the study would need a large size to ensure accuracy of the study.

how is the statment a good example of why qualitative methodologie is more valuable in advancing cross-cultural research?

I think qualitative methodologies are very valuable in advancing cross-cultural research. Qualitative methodologies are used in cross-cultural research by cultural anthropologist for what are called ethnographies. Ethnographies involve observation and field-work within the cultural context and require descriptive qualitative analysis. Some of the advantages of studies involving two or three countries compared to studies that involve ten or more countries are a more concentrated and have a smaller study group. Another advantage is being able to report various cultural variables as it relates to the study and qualitative data. A few disadvantages of studies involving two or three countries compared to involving ten or more countries are the potential for inaccurate results if it does not include the entire population. Another disadvantage of three countries in a study instead of ten countries in the study are the potential for high bias due to a lack of representation, and lastly for example the study would need a large size to ensure accuracy of the study.

Wang X, Cheng Z. Cross-Sectional Studies: Strengths, Weaknesses, and Recommendations. C